Skip to main content

France wants to fine smartphone makers if they don’t hack into criminal’s phones

Apple’s ongoing battle against the FBI concerning encryption and privacy is such a heated issue, it was inevitable other countries and governments would soon start making their feelings known. Yann Galut, a socialist MP in France, has proposed a law that will punish companies financially if they do not provide access to phone data when asked to do so, according to a report in Le Parisien.

It’s an amendment to an existing law, that would force technology companies — not just Apple, the law applies to any relevant firm including Samsung, Google, and others — to provide codes that open up locked devices for use in police investigations. Should the request be refused, or the code not provided in a reasonable amount of time, Galut suggests a fine of a million euros (just over $1 million) should be levied.

Recommended Videos

“Only money will force these extremely powerful companies to comply,” Galut is quoted as saying, adding, “They are hiding behind supposed privacy protection, but they’re quick to make commercial use of personal data they’re collecting.”

In an effort to calm fears about government surveillance, the backdoor access codes would only be used against criminals under investigation, he said. Also, the intention is only for a prosecutor or judge to have access to the code itself, and only be available to computers used in court proceedings. There will be no general code for use by law enforcement, and the police wouldn’t have the right to use it against any regular citizen.

France’s monetary punishment is an unusual approach, but it’s not the first to try and force through an anti-encryption bill that would force companies to provide backdoor access to software. In the U.K., the proposed Investigatory Powers Bill asks for the same thing, and came under fire from Apple CEO Tim Cook at the end of 2015.

There’s no indication the French legal amendment will be passed into law, but it’s further evidence of continued pressure against data encryption methods provided by technology companies.

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
Apple says iPhone 16e users don’t care about MagSafe — they’re probably right
A group of iPhone 16e phones arranged in a pattern.

The iPhone 16e launches today, and the first reviews are starting to appear online. One review that caught my attention was from John Gruber at Daring Fireball. The lengthy review has some information he picked up from Apple officials on why the company elected not to include MagSafe for wireless charging on the iPhone 16e. The reason is almost certainly on the mark and isn't all about saving money.

As we’ve already noted, Apple’s latest budget phone shares many features with the iPhone 16. However, the iPhone 16e is priced $200 lower. As a result, some features present in the iPhone 16 are omitted from the iPhone 16e, with MagSafe being one of them.

Read more
Apple may finally admit that 8GB isn’t enough RAM for an iPhone
Leaked render of iPhone 17 Pro Max front glass and rear camera bar module.

These days, 8GB of RAM is the baseline for Apple devices (the minimum amount required to run Apple Intelligence.) Several insiders have already suggested the iPhone 17 Pro could see a RAM boost up to 12GB, and now Jeff Pu of GFHK Tech Research has thrown his hat into the ring — and he agrees that it's likely.

For the past several generations, each new series of iPhone has seen an upgrade to its internals. The iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max both had 8GB of RAM compared to the 6GB in their non-Pro variants, while the full iPhone 16 lineup has 8GB. A jump to 12GB for the iPhone 17 Pro suggests it could have access to yet-to-be-announced Apple Intelligence features, but it also makes the phone more future-proof.

Read more
I won’t be buying an iPhone 16e for anyone in my family, here’s why
Hand holding iPhone 16e.

Apple’s iPhone 16e is a strange duck. When one sits down and considers the specs, it’s hard to figure out where it truly fits into Apple’s lineup.

It’s apparent from the name that Apple wants you to see it as the new junior member of the iPhone 16 lineup. That’s certainly fair, and it’s arguably about time that the iPhone family got a third tier. After all, Apple’s chief rivals like Google and Samsung have had their A-series and FE-series phones for years.

Read more