Skip to main content

Tim Cook’s not impressed with the UK’s proposed anti-encryption bill

Tim Cook
In the UK, a proposed new law that would force companies to provide unencrypted data to law enforcement, provided the request came with a warrant, has captured Apple CEO Tim Cook’s attention. Named the Investigatory Powers Bill, it’s under consideration by the UK government now, so why is Tim Cook involved?

It’s actually quite simple. Apple employs end-to-end encryption technology on its iMessage platform, makes a big deal out of not invading your privacy, and has absolutely no wish to hand over any data to anyone — warrant or no warrant. In an interview with The Telegraph, Tim Cook spoke at length about the problems passing the bill could create. Ever the diplomat, he did all this without specifically mentioning Apple or its own use of encryption.

“To protect people who use any products, you have to encrypt,” said Cook. “We believe very strongly in end-to-end encryption with no back doors. We don’t think people want us to read their messages. We don’t feel we have the right to read their emails.” He went on to say that by placing a back door into any program, it can be exploited by anyone, not just law enforcement. Cook warned that by forcing the inclusion of a loophole like this could have “dire consequences.”

In the interview, Cook concentrated on the potential for human harm — both mentally and potentially, physically — if the reliance on encryption is lowered, or its made less secure. He argued that by doing this, “the people that you hurt are not the folks that want to do bad things. It’s the good people.”

Despite his words of warning, Cook says he is optimistic the UK government will do the right thing, and that public and press pressure will help push it in the correct direction. “You can’t weaken cryptography. You need to strengthen it,” he added.

Cooks words come soon after Apple told the U.S. government it cannot break the encryption built into an iPhone, even if it wanted to, following an increase in security in iOS 8 and iOS 9.

Editors' Recommendations

Andy Boxall
Senior Mobile Writer
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
Tim Cook bristles at the idea that the Apple HomePod is following the Echo
apple homepod

Rich Shibley/Digital Trends

By the time the Apple HomePod made its official debut earlier in 2018, the Amazon Echo had already spent over three years with homeowners. As such, it's hard to blame folks for comparing the two smart speakers, and yes, perhaps suggesting that the HomePod took a few cues from its older competitor. But unsurprisingly, Apple CEO Tim Cook is none too pleased with the insinuation. In a recent interview with Fast Company, the executive dismissed claims that the HomePod is in any way a "me too" product.

Read more
There will be no tours of Apple Park, CEO Tim Cook says
no tourist tours of apple park  feb 2018

APPLE PARK February 2018 Drone Update 4K

Apple Park, better known as the "spaceship" campus for the striking, circular design of its main building, has been welcoming workers for nearly a year, though the finishing touches are still being added to some parts of the sprawling site.

Read more
Proposed U.K. law lets authorities snoop on communications, defeat encryption
uk investigatory powers bill 2 gchq

The United Kingdom's Investigatory Powers Bill faced a firestorm of criticism this week after a leak of documents detailing the law's surveillance powers. According to the International Business Times, it would permit U.K. law enforcement agencies to request the content of telephone calls, text messages, and internet browsing activity, and require some telecoms and services to provide a way around encryption.

The leak included a nine-page draft titled "technical capability notice," which required internet providers and phone companies to "provide and maintain the capability to ensure the interception, in their entirety, of all communications [...] in their entirety, of all secondary data authorized by or required by the warrant." Telecom companies would be expected to hand over data within 24 hours, in some cases, and would be required to store data for 12 months.

Read more