Skip to main content

The NSA claims its systems are too complex to stop deleting incriminating data

The NSA is claiming that its systems are so complex that it cannot prevent the destruction of evidence that may be damaging to its case in a lawsuit against privacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). 

In the case in question, Jewel vs. NSA, which was filed in 2008, the EFF sued the NSA on behalf of AT&T customers. The EFF claims that the NSA unlawfully collected information and records of Americans’ Internet and telephone use. Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey White issued an emergency order that prohibited the NSA from destroying data that the EFF had asked for in the lawsuit. The agency is fighting the directive. According to the Washington Post, the NSA is arguing that holding on to the data it collects about the phone and Internet activities of American citizens is too burdensome.  

Recommended Videos

“A requirement to preserve all data acquired under section 702 presents significant operational problems, only one of which is that the NSA may have to shut down all systems and databases that contain Section 702 information,” said NSA Deputy Director Richard Ledgett in a court filing.

“Communications acquired pursuant to Section 702 reside within multiple databases contained on multiple systems and the precise manner in which NSA stays consistent with its legal obligations under the [FISA Amendments Act] has resulted from years of detailed interaction,” he added.

Section 702 refers to a portion of the Amendments Act of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The legislation, which allowed the NSA to collect “content of communications” such as emails, Facebook messages, and web browsing histories, has been used by the NSA to justify its surveillance activities. 

Declassified documents that contain the testimony of Teresa H. Shea, the agency’s director for its Signals Intelligence Directorate (SID), outline the prescribed period for retaining the data. “Since May 2006, the NSA has collected bulk telephony metadata pursuant to FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) orders directing telecommunications service providers to produce to the NSA on a daily basis electronic copies of ‘call detail’ records created by the recipient providers for calls to, from, or wholly within the United States,” Shea said.

“To protect U.S. person information the FISC’s orders impose procedures to minimize access to use, dissemination, and retention of the data consistent with the need to acquire, produce and disseminate foreign intelligence information. Among these is the requirement to destroy all bulk telephony metadata obtained under the FISC’s Section 215 orders within five years (60 months) of the data’s collection,” Shea said.  

Ledgett also stated that the agency erases data through “a combination of technical and human-based processes.”

The EFF is using the NSA’s argument to its advantage. Cindy Cohn, the EFF’s legal director, said that the agency’s inability to track the data it collects shows the dangers of conducting such a wide-reaching surveillance program.

“To me, it demonstrates that once the government has custody of this information even they can’t keep track of it anymore even for purposes of what they don’t want to destroy,” she told the Washington Post. “With the huge amounts of data that they’re gathering it’s not surprising to me that it’s difficult to keep track– that’s why I think it’s so dangerous for them to be collecting all this data en masse.” 

The EFF’s full complaint can be found here. If you want a more detailed look at how the NSA collects your phone and Internet records, you can read Shea’s testimony here. However, know that some details are still hidden because parts of Shea’s comments have been redacted.

Christian Brazil Bautista
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Christian Brazil Bautista is an experienced journalist who has been writing about technology and music for the past decade…
Huawei goes wearable mad, reveals four new smartwatches
A promotional image of the Huawei Watch 5 42mm.

Huawei has gone wearable mad for its latest releases, with the Huawei Watch 5 leading the charge and coming in two sizes, closely followed by the Watch Fit 4 and Watch Fit 4 Pro. All follow the announcement of the Huawei Watch GT 5, GT 5 Pro, and Watch Ultimate at the end of 2024. Here’s what you need to know about these interesting new smartwatches. 

Huawei Watch 5

Read more
Apple CarPlay Ultra looks stunning in Aston Martin supercar debut
Apple CarPlay Ultra

Apple CarPlay Ultra is the next generation of the Cupertino, California-based firm's smartphone projection system for your car, and it's available in new vehicles in the US and Canada.

When we say "new cars", your options are very much limited to one brand... Aston Martin. So you'll need deep pockets if you want to experience CarPlay Ultra for yourself.

Read more
Hidden US carriers perks you might not have known about
T-Mobile on iPhone.

In the competitive landscape of US mobile carriers, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and others constantly vie for your attention with flashy deals on the latest smartphones and promises of expansive coverage. However, beyond the headline offerings lie a treasure trove of often-overlooked perks and benefits that can significantly enhance your mobile experience and even save you money. These perks are constantly changing; visiting carrier websites for the most current information on available perks is wise.

Let's delve into some of these hidden gems (at the time of this writing) you might not have known about from the big three and a few others.

Read more