Skip to main content

Bicentennial Man at 25: Why Robin Williams’ sci-fi movie bomb is still misunderstood

Robin Williams in the poster for Bicentennial Man.
Buena Vista Pictures Distribution

This year marks the 10th anniversary of the death of actor and comedian Robin Williams, who embodied a wide variety of characters during his career. He voiced the genie in Disney’s Aladdin, he was an alien in Mork & Mindy, and he played a killer in Christopher Nolan’s Insomnia. 25 years ago this month, Williams played a robot named Andrew in Bicentennial Man, an adaptation of two Isaac Asimov stories. In this world, Andrew has uniquely humanlike qualities, but he also has difficulty being recognized as a sentient being by a world that isn’t ready to accept that he’s more than just a robot. 

At the time of its release, Bicentennial Man was savaged by critics who found it “mawkish” and “sentimental” while seemingly failing to grasp what it was supposed to be. This isn’t a robot action movie, and Andrew’s journey toward humanity is largely guided by the love he has for others. It’s not a perfect film by any means, but Bicentennial Man‘s best qualities have been overlooked for too long, and now the film is barely available to stream. It deserves a better digital afterlife than that.

Recommended Videos

Robin Williams went all out to portray the title character

Robin Williams in Bicentennial Man.
Buena Vista Pictures Distribution

Without Williams around to provide his insights on playing Andrew, we can only speculate about what the film meant to him. But Williams was dedicated enough to the role that he actually wore the Andrew robot for the first half of the movie when his character still outwardly resembled a conventional robot.

Bicentennial Man (1999) | Production Featurette | Behind The Scenes

The actor also seemed to relish the opportunity to play an artificial man who goes on a two-century journey to be recognized as a unique sentient being.

The relationships in the movie are touching

Sam Neill and Robin Williams in Bicentennial Man.
Buena Vista Pictures Distribution

Asimov’s novels and stories have sometimes been called clinical because he doesn’t always seem very interested in writing about the ways humans relate to each other or fall in love. That’s why there is no love story in the short stories that inspired this movie, but there is one in the film as it explores the different kinds of love that Andrew feels for his owners in the Martin family.

One of the more interesting relationships that Andrew has is with Richard Martin (Sam Neill), his direct owner. Richard shields Andrew from destruction when his creativity freaks out the company that made him. Rather than allowing the company to scrap Andrew, Richard protects him and urges him to explore his humanlike qualities. He’s a true friend to Andrew, which is why he’s so deeply hurt when Andrew offers him money for his independence. Richard never saw himself as a master, and the idea of that offended him so greatly that it severely strains his friendship with Andrew.

Robin Williams and Embeth Davidtz in Bicentennial Man.
Buena Vista Pictures Distribution

Andrew also feels deeply connected to Richard’s youngest daughter, Amanda “Little Miss” Martin (Hallie Kate Eisenberg), before eventually falling in love with Amanda’s daughter, Portia Charney (Embeth Davidtz), decades later. The love story of the film unfolds between Andrew and Portia, and that also fuels his desire to become even more human.

The film explores what Andrew has to give up to be human

Bicentennial Man - "I thought you said a quick kiss. I lied..."

This future world isn’t very kind to robots, and it’s made clear early in the film that robots have no rights under the law. They are simply tools to be exploited by humanity. If there’s a major failing in the movie, it’s that Andrew never seriously questions if he should become human, given how imperfect our species is. Instead, Andrew realizes that his mind will never be enough to convince humans that he’s like them, so he undergoes body modifications to be more human. At that point, Andrew suddenly looks a lot like Robin Williams.

The movie portrayed Andrew’s slow transformation as a triumph, but it’s hard to call it that when the journey requires him to give up almost everything that made him unique in the first place. It is what Andrew wanted, but being human — or as close to human as possible — means that Andrew can’t go on forever. He’ll have to live and die as a man.

Bicentennial Man is related to I, Robot and Foundation

Will Smith looking at a row of robots in I, Robot.
20th Century Fox

Although this film wasn’t meant to be connected to Will Smith’s I, Robot movie, Disney’s 2019 acquisition of Fox means that 20th Century Studios films like I, Robot are now Disney flicks as well. Since Disney already produced Bicentennial Man, we could argue that a shared universe is already in place.

Biicentennial Man - Theatrical Trailer (HQ)

It’s a little harder to make that work with Foundation since that sci-fi series is on Apple TV+. But I, Robot and Bicentennial Man were meant to be the distant past of Asimov’s Foundation universe. In that regard, it’s interesting to see that the universe never really became a paradise and that there were robot wars against humanity. However, Bicentennial Man embraces hope rather than mapping out an uncertain future. And it gives Andrew the happy ending (for him) he always wanted.

Rent or buy Bicentennial Man on Prime Video.

Topics
Blair Marnell
Blair Marnell has been an entertainment journalist for over 15 years. His bylines have appeared in Wizard Magazine, Geek…
Why Looper is one the best sci-fi movies in the last 10 years
Old Joe points a gun at someone off-screen in Looper.

As Rian Johnson prepares to premiere Glass Onion, his highly anticipated follow-up to 2019's surprise hit Knives Out, his first major success, Looper, turns 10. In a career full of critical and commercial hits, Johnson has made a name for himself as an innovative and clever writer and a stylish and deft filmmaker. The result is a storyteller unlike any other in Hollywood, a man who effortlessly blends genres, styles, and themes without compromising his vision.

His place in the industry as a twisty but reliable auteur is thanks to Looper. The science fiction film starring Bruce Willis, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Emily Blunt turned him into an overnight sensation, the rare Hollywood talent who could deliver a commercially viable spectacle that both mainstream audiences and thinking-person cinema aficionados could love. And as Looper reaches the decade milestone, it's time to look back at what made it such an unexpected success.
The risk that paid off

Read more
The Gray Man stinks! Why Netflix has never made a great action movie
ryan gosling five most badass roles the gray man

Few streaming services have worked as hard as Netflix has in recent years to launch a true blockbuster. The Gray Man has been a tremendous success for the service, at least according to their own internal metrics, but it's hardly the first time that they've attempted to launch a piece of original intellectual property by throwing massive amounts of money at it. In spite of all that money, though, Netflix has yet to produce the kind of brilliant action spectacle that makes for a truly great movie.

That doesn't mean, though, that Netflix has never made a great movie. Plenty of their prestige, awards-season plays have totally panned out, and movies like The Power of the Dog and Marriage Story have proven that the streamer can get behind great movies. In the world of action, though, their movies have been pretty thoroughly lacking. The Gray Man is just one of many attempts that seems great on paper but doesn't ultimately deliver on its promise.

Read more
Why the original The Man Who Fell to Earth still holds up
David Bowie looking at the camera in The Man Who Fell to Earth.

When Paramount+ announced a series adaptation of Nicolas Roeg's timeless cult classic The Man Who Fell to Earth from 1976, it seemed like another beloved cult classic unnecessarily adapted into a streaming series. (Picnic at Hanging Rock is the most egregious example of this popular trend.) We live in the age of nostalgia, and studios are looking for any movie that might work as a rebooted miniseries or television show to support the plethora of streaming services. However, the original The Man Who Fell to Earth isn't exactly "viewer-friendly," so what's the need for a remake? If it's faithful to the movie, will mainstream audiences find it a rewarding viewing experience? On the contrary, would the remake do the revered movie a disservice by changing too many things?

The Man Who Fell to Earth is intentionally challenging, blending bizarre imagery with complex and, at times, convoluted storytelling, resulting in a collection of scenes and events passing for a proper narrative. The Man Who Fell to Earth lacks cohesiveness and has glaring plot holes -- surprising, considering the relatively straightforward plot -- yet they seem intentional, in keeping with the project's nature. The film is more interested in asking questions than answering them, leaving fans feeling overwhelmed, not only by the intense and powerful visuals but by the thought-provoking themes that are there to beguile and, perhaps, deliberately confuse.
The role he was born to play

Read more