Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Be a wuss: Pixar movies make you cry, and that’s OK

If you’re a cynic, you probably walked out of Coco convinced that you’d just been manipulated. You may have found the opening minutes of Up to be cloying and sentimental, or you might think that, as beautiful as some parts of Soul may be, it’s all a little bit obvious. Pixar movies became a dominant force in our cultural conversations as soon as we first met Woody and Buzz in 1995, and since the very beginning, the storytellers at the studio have been remarkably good at making adults cry like babies.

In more recent years, the weeping that many come to expect from a great Pixar movie has begun to feel like a trap to some. Critics argue that Pixar adheres too closely to the formula it established in its earliest days, and that it’s too reliant on sentiment and preening to move its audience. All of that might be true, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the experience of a good Pixar cry is not worthwhile.

UP: Stuff I'm Going to Do

Boys don’t cry — we all do

Perhaps the best recent example of a great Pixar weepy is Coco, a movie about Miguel, a young member of a Mexican family who discovers that his family’s deceased patriarch is misunderstood and on the verge of being forgotten completely. The movie’s emotional climax comes in the form of a song, one that Miguel sings to his great grandmother in the hopes that she will remember her father, who disappeared when she was still a child.

Recommended Videos

This moment is deeply affecting, and it also adheres pretty strictly to what Pixar almost always pulls off near the climax of its stories: A character who was once misunderstood asserts the right to make themselves heard, and the protagonist learns a lesson about empathy or history or what it means to continue to love the people you’ve lost.

Joy shows Sadness a bright ball in Inside Out.
Disney

Inside Out provides another recent example. The movie’s thematic content is all about the emotions of a teenager, represented by five characters living inside her head. Joy, the film’s protagonist, spends most of the running time trying to keep control and ensure that Riley, the girl she’s living inside of, remains happy above all else. It’s Joy’s panic at losing control that kicks off the movie’s plot, and the film’s emotional climax is her realization that Riley’s other emotions, and Sadness in particular, also have a role to play in guiding Riley toward a fulfilling emotional life.

At its core, all Inside Out is really telling audiences is that being sad is OK, but the film delivers that message so artfully that it feels like a revelation. The same holds in Coco, a movie that is really just about how sad it is to lose someone you love. These are not complicated ideas, but they work on both kids and adults because, at its best, Pixar is so smart about deploying its unsubtle themes through its characters.

Simple yet universal messages

There are some who find the simplicity and overt sentiment of Pixar’s core themes cloying, but one of the reasons the studio has found such success within a pretty standard formula is because everyone can find something in the stories it tells. However, that can strip away some elements of individual experience, but Pixar has started to bridge that gap, albeit haltingly.

Coco focuses on a distinctly Mexican experience, Soul is about a Black man in Harlem, and Turning Red is perhaps the most radical movie of them all, taking Pixar’s storytelling conventions and creating a story that is hyper-attuned to the specific rhythms of a child of Chinese immigrants.

Ming Lee looks concerned in Turning Red (2022)
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Something like Turning Red suggests how Pixar can evolve without abandoning the successes that have brought it to its dominant place in the entertainment industry. The movie has universal themes about the relationships between mothers and daughters, but it is inflected with the specific experience that some Chinese kids may have with domineering mothers. It’s a classic empathy machine, allowing you to find points of similarity against a backdrop that may be wildly different from your own.

Exceptions to the rule

Of course, Pixar’s tear machine does not work on every person every time. The entire Cars universe feels more like a cynical cash grab than a genuine attempt to tell good stories, and Lightyear feels like one of the strangest IP extensions to come out in the past decade, and that’s saying something.

If a specific Pixar movie makes you well up involuntarily, though, there’s no shame in giving in. Our emotions are not always within our control, and even if your brain knows that you’re being manipulated by the story you’re watching, it may not be able to stop you from crying anyway. Those tears are real, and they come from a recognition that the story you’re being told is one that has a deep truth about how you see the world.

Sully says good-bye to Boo in Monsters, Inc.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It’s undeniably true, then, that Pixar movies are often simple, blunt instruments designed to communicate basic truths about the world. What’s also true, though, is that as obvious as some of those truths may be, many, many people need something like a Pixar movie to help them face those truths head on.

If you’re a father trying to protect their child from a scary world, the fact that Finding Nemo is just about the difficulty of letting go doesn’t make watching the movie any less profound. If you’re struggling with your sense of purpose in life and your work, the fact that Toy Story only tiptoes up to acknowledging that everyone dies eventually doesn’t make watching the movie any less moving for you.

Toy story 3 Andy gives his toys away

Movies are designed to allow you to see yourself in the stories of others, and to help you feel things that you may work hard not to feel during your everyday existence. Pixar at its best is incredibly good at making you feel something, even if that something is resentment at how teary-eyed you’ve become. If you want to be resentful, you’re more than welcome to, but we shouldn’t be mad at Pixar just because they know how to unlock doors we want to keep closed.

You can view the entire Pixar library on Disney+. To check out that studio’s latest releases, please read our what’s new on Disney+ list.

Joe Allen
Joe Allen is a freelance writer at Digital Trends, where he covers Movies and TV. He frequently writes streaming…
7 most unnecessary sequels ever
Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix hold mics and smile in Joker: Folie à Deux."

It's common knowledge that many movie sequels fail to live up to the hype and quality of their predecessors. Film studios usually try to follow the money by making a follow-up to a movie that succeeded in theaters. However, filmmakers can't always replicate the magic of the original film, which has led to some lackluster sequels.

These films can bomb so spectacularly or miss the mark by so much that some even argue that they had no business existing at all. While almost any film can be deemed "unnecessary," there are many sequels to critically and commercially successful motion pictures that really didn't need to be made.

Read more
I’ve seen enough. Glen Powell is a better Running Man than Arnold Schwarzenegger
Glen Powell poses in a disguise in The Running Man.

Paramount Pictures revealed the first trailer for The Running Man, a dystopian action movie based on Stephen King's 1982 novel. Glen Powell headlines The Running Man, and despite the lack of footage, it's clear that his Ben Richards will be better than the one portrayed by Arnold Schwarzenegger.

"Stop filming me!" Powell's Richards screams before an explosion launches the character off a bridge and into the water. In a near-future society, Ben faces a financial crisis. He needs a doctor to save his sick daughter. Because desperate times call for desperate measures, Ben enters The Running Man, a deadly competition where contestants ("Runners") must survive 30 days. During that timeframe, professional assassins ("Hunters") hunt the contestants down, intending to kill them. Survive and win the grand prize, or die and get nothing.

Read more
The Old Guard 2 cast chooses iconic movie moments to witness for the first time
A group of soldiers stand in the dirt in The Old Guard 2.

Internet culture in the Digital Age moves at the snap of a finger. Thanks to the social media algorithm, what's popular today might not be talked about tomorrow. Five years feels like a lifetime. That's how long it's been since The Old Guard premiered on Netflix. It's fitting that a follow-up to a movie about a team of immortals would take its time before hitting the service. Mortals, rejoice. The wait is over. The Old Guard 2 is now available to stream on Netflix.

Charlize Theron returns for the action-packed sequel as Andy, the leader of a team of immortal mercenaries who serve as protectors of the world. The team consists of immortals Nile (KiKi Layne), Joe (Marwan Kenzari), and Nicky (Luca Marinelli), along with a mortal, James Copley (Chiwetel Ejiofor). Speaking of finite creatures, Andy now copes with her mortality, which affects every decision, knowing she can finally die. Andy and her team will be tested with the arrival of Discord (Uma Thurman), the very first immortal with a sinister plan that threatens the universe. To defeat Discord, Andy seeks the help of an old friend, Tuah (Henry Golding), who may hold the secrets of immortality.

Read more