Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. News

We now know why Christian Bale and Leonardo DiCaprio passed on Steve Jobs

Add as a preferred source on Google

The critics’ verdict is in and Michael Fassbender seems to have hit it out of the park as Apple visionary Steve Jobs … but he wasn’t the first choice to play the role.

While we have known for a while now that both Christian Bale and Leonardo DiCaprio passed on the part, thanks to The Hollywood Reporter, we now know why.

Recommended Videos

Apparently, Jobs’ widow Laurene Powell Jobs, did her best to prevent the project from ever seeing the light of day and went so far as to call both Bale and DiCaprio personally to urge them to turn down the role. THR quotes a “key player” on the film as saying “since the very beginning, Laurene Jobs has been trying to kill this movie, OK? Laurene Jobs called Leo DiCaprio and said: ‘Don’t do it.’ Laurene Jobs called Christian Bale and said: ‘Don’t [do it].’”

Her entreaties were not limited to Bale and DiCaprio either. Apparently, Powell Jobs also appealed to studio execs at Sony Pictures (where the film was originally being developed) and Universal, but the latter went ahead with the project anyway.

Steve Jobs presents a complicated, nuanced picture of its subject and shines the same bright light on his flaws that it does on his strengths. Perhaps that’s the reason why Powell Jobs went out of her way to derail the film, or perhaps it’s because she saw it as exploitative. She has yet to comment on the article, but she is reportedly a very private person and we’re sure the emotion stemming from her husband’s 2011 death is still very raw.

For his part, current Apple CEO Tim Cook seems to feel that the film took advantage of tragedy and during an appearance on The Late Show, told Stephen Colbert “I think that a lot of people are trying to be opportunistic, and I hate this; it’s not a great part of our world.”

Aaron Sorkin, who penned the film’s script, quickly fired back with a three-pronged response “Nobody did this movie to get rich,” said Sorkin “secondly, Tim Cook should really see the movie before he decides what it is. Third, if you’ve got a factory full of children in China assembling phones for 17 cents an hour, you’ve got a lot of nerve calling someone else opportunistic.”

Ouch. Clearly, this film has stirred up quite a bit of controversy.

Whichever side you come down on, Steve Jobs hits theaters Oct. 23, 2015.

Adam Poltrack
Former Contributor
Adam is an A/V News Writer for Digital Trends, and is responsible for bringing you the latest advances in A/V…
An AI-generated movie flopped in China despite its budget and Hollywood must take notes
China’s AI-made movie bombed at the box office while a human-made low-budget, animated film struck gold.
empty-movie-hall

China just gave Hollywood a cautionary tale about AI filmmaking. Sanxingdui: Future Past, billed as the country's first fully AI-generated movie, hit theaters on October 23 and bombed at the box office.

According to Futurism, the film's reported $1.5 million production budget landed on more than 10,000 screens. Yet it pulled in only about $181,000, averaging roughly $20 per screen, making the budget difficult to recover.

Read more
Grok’s AI-generated Odyssey series is seven minutes of nothing happening beautifully
The landscapes look convincing. The fake Hugh Jackman and Instagram-face amalgamation playing Penelope are harder to forgive.
Uniform ships Odyssey by Grok

Some of the best shots in Grok Imagine’s AI-made Odyssey don’t contain actors. Ancient landscapes stretch into the distance. Close-ups of grimy hands suggest people who have touched something rougher than a keyboard. For a few seconds, the illusion holds.

https://twitter.com/imagine/status/2113712964419063911

Read more
YouTube’s next big upgrade could make videos use 30% less data
AV2 could reduce the data needed to stream videos while enabling better HDR and multi-view experiences.
youtube-feature-upgrade-TV-4k

YouTube videos could soon look better without eating quite so much data, right? Thankfully, the platform plans to introduce a new video format called AV2 on its web player in early 2027, promising more efficient streaming and potentially fewer playback hiccups on slower internet connections. The big headline is a roughly 30% improvement in compression efficiency over AV1, YouTube's existing video format. That doesn't guarantee every video will use 30% less data, but it could make streaming a little easier on both internet connections and data allowances.

What is AV2, and why should viewers care?

Read more