Skip to main content

The Outfit review: An endlessly entertaining gangster thriller

Contrary to what its title might make you think, The Outfit is less interested in putting together an ensemble than it is in tearing away the layers of one man’s façade. In this case, the man in question is Leonard (Mark Rylance), a British immigrant who runs a tailor shop in midcentury Chicago. As his opening narration tells us, Leonard takes pride in his work, and he loves his tailor shop so much that he’s willing to let the local mob use it as an unofficial post office if it means he gets to keep it open.

But Leonard is not as unassuming and carefree as he wants everyone around him to believe. Much like the suits he cuts and stitches together for his clients, Leonard is a man of many layers. The Outfit seeks to gradually peel away those layers over the course of its 106-minute runtime, and to its credit, the film never struggles to come up with entertaining ways to reveal new shades of its central protagonist.

Based on an original screenplay co-written by Johnathan McClain and director Graham Moore (The Imitation Game), The Outfit focuses on Leonard when his life is thrown into complete disarray after his gangster clients decide to use his tailor shop as a safehouse. Set entirely in his shop, the film follows Leonard as he finds himself caught up in a mob conspiracy involving an FBI tape and an enemy gang, forcing him to make a number of increasingly difficult decisions over the course of a single night.

More than meets the eye

Zoey Deutch looking at Mark Rylance in The Outfit.
Focus Features, 2022

The Outfit is one of the rare films that, like David Cronenberg’s Eastern Promises or William Friedkin’s The French Connection, seeks to work as both a character study and crime thriller. To its credit, the film mostly succeeds at doing that. As a contained, paranoia-driven gangster flick, The Outfit provides enough moments of fittingly bloody violence and genuine hair-raising tension to be a consistently entertaining, fun ride.

Once the film’s plot kicks into gear, it rarely ever pauses to allow the audience or its characters a moment to breathe. Its script constantly introduces new twists and players into an already complicated conflict, which helps the film move at a relatively brisk pace. Unfortunately, The Outfit’s desire to be constantly entertaining is what also leads to some of its biggest issues.

In their attempt to make the film’s story as unpredictable as possible, Moore and McClain pack too many moments into its third act that not only fail to be as surprising as some of The Outfit‘s earlier twists but also end up being more confusing than awe-inspiring. Furthermore, although Mark Rylance’s Leonard is an intriguing figure for much of The Outfit’s runtime, the movie ultimately reveals a bit too much about him. The film’s third act, in particular, robs the character of much of his mystery.

Critical decisions

Johnny Flynn smiling while standing by Mark Rylance in The Outfit.
Focus Features, 2022

While The Outfit does fumble its exploration of Leonard, Mark Rylance never has any trouble keeping your attention on him. Rylance is a performer who knows how useful stillness and silence can be on the big screen, and he uses both skills to powerful effect in The Outfit. The actor navigates his character’s various layers and lies with expert precision, always doing just enough to let us know when Leonard has a new trick up his sleeve without ever overly telegraphing what he’s going to do next.

It doesn’t hurt that Rylance is surrounded by a number of talented performers in The Outfit, including Johnny Flynn, Dylan O’Brien, Zoey Deutch, Simon Russell Beale, and Nikki Amuka-Bird. For his part, Flynn is properly menacing as a mob enforcer who finds himself sharing a number of deadly secrets with Rylance’s Leonard, and O’Brien brings the right level of petulance and arrogance to his performance as Richie, a gangster prince desperate to prove that he’s worthy of becoming king one day.

However, while they play their roles well, the film’s supporting actors are all portraying recognizable crime movie archetypes, whether it be the skilled and loyal enforcer, the unpredictable hothead, or the femme fatale with more secrets than she lets on. Thankfully, that’s part of the film’s design, as it uses the familiarity of its supporting players to make Rylance’s soft-spoken, brilliant tailor stand out that much more. As a result, even if the film can’t help but reveal too much about him, Rylance’s Leonard remains the most interesting person in the room from the moment The Outfit begins to the moment it ends.

The measure of a man

Mark Rylance sitting at at cutting table in The Outfit.
Focus Features, 2022

Much like its protagonist, The Outfit is both more than it appears to be on the surface and frustratingly less than the sum of its many parts. As an exploration of one surprisingly capable man, the film is a flawed character study that doesn’t know how to stop when it’s ahead. However, as an exercise in building and sustaining tension, The Outfit is an enjoyable and often effective crime thriller, one that succeeds in making the absolute most out of its limited scope.

It’s a well-crafted piece of popcorn entertainment that, perhaps more than anything else, serves as a potent reminder that there are few things more powerful than watching a person be forced to make decisions they normally wouldn’t. After all, a man’s attire can tell you a lot about him, but it’s his choices that ultimately tell you who he truly is. The Outfit proves that.

The Outfit hits theaters on Friday, March 18.

Editors' Recommendations

Alex Welch
Alex is a TV and movies writer based out of Los Angeles. In addition to Digital Trends, his work has been published by…
Watcher review: A pointed exercise in voyeuristic suspense
Maika Monroe stares through a gate in Watcher.

When the Roman poet Juvenal asked, in so many translated words, “Who watches the watchers?” he was talking about infidelity. But the question has taken on multiple usages across the lexicon in the centuries since. Watcher, a sightly and sight-oriented exercise in mounting suspense from director Chloe Okuno, builds a whole movie on top of it. Here, voyeurism is a two-way street, where the watcher becomes the watched and vice versa. The defining image of the film is a figure, obscured by distance and drapes, peering out from a window across the way, inviting the very scrutiny in which he’s surreptitiously indulging.

Fledgling expat Julia (Maika Monroe) has been in Bucharest for only a few hours when she first spots the peeping tom. She’s just moved there from New York with her husband, Francis (Karl Glusman), whose family is from Romania; the prodigal son has returned for a lucrative new job in … maybe marketing, the movie barely clarifies. It’s not the easiest transition for Julia, who doesn’t speak the language (the dialogue not in English goes shrewdly un-subtitled, to forge some instant identification with her) and has no friends in this new city she explores alone during the long hours Francis is at work. Their condo is swanky but a little too vast, with big windows that render her private life public.

Read more
The Innocents review: A wan killer-kid thriller
Rakel Lenora Fløttum looks uncertain in the woods.

Any horror movie that calls itself The Innocents is inviting comparisons. That’s the title, after all, of a true classic: Jack Clayton’s elegant 1961 haunted-house psychodrama, in which Deborah Kerr shuddered and quaked with a superstitious terror that may actually have been a coded expression of her own perverse desires. The film haunts the marshy fields of its genre, its influence enduring in every pale aristocratic heroine petrified by the turning of a screw, every creepily proper child running wild through an old dark house, every lonely spirit standing ominously silent in the middle distance.

Written and directed by Eskil Vogt, who scored an Oscar nomination earlier this year for The Worst Person in the World, this new Innocents is not, in any official capacity, a remake. There’s more Stan Lee than Henry James in its portrait of grade-school kids acquiring spooky powers during a long, lazy Norwegian summer. But one can still see the phantom impression of Clayton’s movie, unnerving more than half a century after release, in the way Vogt pulls back and back, placing a menacing lone figure against a canvas of negative space. The films are, at the very least, distant relatives. The new one is much less effective, though.

Read more
Operation Mincemeat review: A deceptively good WWII thriller
Two British officers stare at a corpse inside a morgue in a scene from Operation Mincemeat.

War films -- or any movies based on historical events, for that matter -- can be tricky. In most cases, the audience knows where events will ultimately lead, so the story needs to create drama and intrigue out of the material that isn't well-known and let the characters and their relationships draw you into a particular chapter in history.

The Netflix film Operation Mincemeat faces exactly that sort of conundrum with its dramatization of the titular, secret plan by Allied forces to trick the Nazis and hide the 1943 invasion of Sicily in the lead-up to that landmark mission. We know the Allied forces eventually win the war, after all, but filmmaker John Madden's feature still manages to manufacture plenty of compelling moments in telling the story of one of history's greatest wartime acts of deception.

Read more