Skip to main content

Why Quantumania’s Kang is a better MCU villain than Thanos

Until 2019, Marvel was building toward one thing. The first Avengers movie in 2012 promised fans that Thanos was coming, and that’s exactly what happened when Infinity War finally hit theaters six years later. When we finally got to meet Thanos, it became pretty easy to appreciate why he posed such a unique threat to our heroes.

Now that he’s been defeated, though, a new hero is emerging who will define the next era of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Kang has arrived, and if the hype is to be believed, he’s going to be even worse than Thanos. Now that we’ve officially met the character in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, here are a few reasons Kang is a better villain than his MCU predecessor.

Kang is more powerful than Thanos

Thanos gets ready to battle in Avengers: Endgame.
Marvel Studios

Thanos certainly presented the Avengers with a challenge, and his power continued to grow as he amassed the various infinity stones. Kang, though, seems to have almost limitless power once he can access even one aspect of his hyperadvanced technology. Just allowing him to have his suit gives him the ability to shoot massive energy beams and move other people with his mind.

The version of Kang that we meet in Quantumania is severely limited by his exile, and even this version of Kang feels almost invincible. Kang has total control over all of time, and because he knows how to manipulate it, he can create and destroy almost at will. When he has reached his full power, he will prove to be almost impossible to stop.

He is not just one character, but many

Kang the Conqueror in "Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania."
Marvel Studios / Marvel Studios

One of the trickier things to grasp about Kang is that there are a million different versions of him. The one we meet in Quantumania is not the same one that Loki meets in Loki, and it’s not the same one we’ll get moving forward. Because Kang is not just one character, Jonathan Majors is going to get to do a whole lot of experimentation as he plays different variants of him.

Even more crucially, though, Kang is like an enemy who never stops coming. If you beat him once, it’s not as if he’s gone forever. Like a many-headed hydra, he just keeps battling. While fighting Thanos required a little bit of time travel, defeating Kang is going to require a much more elaborate plan, and even then, it seems like it might not work.

He is more human and relatable than the Mad God of Titan

Kang smiles in Loki.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Josh Brolin was able to give Thanos an almost shocking amount of humanity and vulnerability, but at the end of the day, he was still a giant purple alien who was superpowered even before he had a single infinity stone. Kang is, by contrast, just a really smart guy. He’s a guy so smart that he discovers technology that allow him to manipulate time in ways no one else has been able to.

The fact that Kang is just a man makes him, in some ways, even more terrifying. His powers don’t come from a freak accident, but from his own intelligence, and that’s going to make him nearly impossible to defeat. He’s not the kind of villain that you can just outsmart.

Kang’s motivation is easier to understand

Loki Thanos
Image used with permission by copyright holder

One of the things that’s so exciting about Kang is that, while we know he’s powerful, we don’t know exactly what he wants just yet other than to conquer. If you believe recent reports, though, it seems like Kang’s goal is to create a single universe where there are no superheroes, which is much easier to sympathize with than Thanos’ strange belief that half the life in the universe had to be destroyed.

Kang has seen the devastation that superheroes have caused, and he wants nothing more than to create a world where people can exist without them. It’s a smaller goal, and one that will also feel more personal for the heroes doing battle against him.

He brings the multiverse with him

doctor-strange-multiverse-of-madness-mister-fantastic-
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Anyone who has been following Disney’s acquisition of Fox knows that the Fantastic Four and X-Men are coming. Exactly when they arrive remains to be seen, but it seems likely that the threat of Kang could be intimately connected to the arrival of the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, which could possibly be from another universe.

Regardless of where the X-Men and Fantastic Four come from, though, the multiverse also opens a wide array of other possibilities. We get to meet multiple different Spider-Men, and see Hugh Jackman play Wolverine again. None of this is directly related to Kang, but it’s all possible because of the direction that Marvel has decided to take its universe in, and Kang is a bit part of that.

Topics
Joe Allen
Joe Allen is a freelance writer based in upstate New York focused on movies and TV.
7 Marvel movies that should have ended differently
Andrew Garfield as Peter-Parker with his mask off in "The Amazing Spider-Man 2."

Despite being one of the most successful film franchises in cinema history, Marvel has released some movies that many fans felt could have had much better endings.

Considering the number of films the comic book giant has released over the years, chances were that it would miss the mark at some point. But this hasn't stopped fans from wondering what could have been with these seven films.
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Read more
Why The Last of Us is better as a TV show than a video game
Pedro Pascal with his finger to his mouth telling someone to be quiet in a scene from The Last of Us on HBO Max.

HBO's series The Last of Us has proven to be one of the most popular and well-crafted TV shows in recent memory, which has helped dispel the stigma toward video game adaptations. But naturally, many people armed with their keyboards have deconstructed the series and made heavy comparisons to the acclaimed video game it is based on.

While some may prefer the game over the show, the TV series has arguably improved it in multiple aspects, including in terms of plot, characters, visuals, and overall mainstream appeal. The series has finished its first season, and with another on the way, there is already proof that The Last of Us is better off as a TV show.
The show focuses more on the narrative

Read more
We might not see Iron Man 4 or Black Panther 3 in the MCU – and that’s a problem
Ton Stark stands with his suit in the background in a scene from Iron Man 3.

The once mighty Marvel brand has taken a beating recently. While the studio's latest movie, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, broke records and grossed over $120 million in its opening weekend, it received generally negative reviews from critics and audiences alike, and the subsequent weekends saw dramatic declines in attendance. The Paul Rudd/Jonathan Majors threequel is the rare Marvel movie to make less than its predecessors, and a few outlets, including Variety and Digital Trends, openly questioned the value of the brand. Is Hollywood's most successful studio finally experiencing audience fatigue?

That question was surprisingly answered, sort of, by Disney's CEO Bob Iger, who recently gave a speech at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom Conference. In regards to Marvel, Iger said that "sequels typically worked well for us. Do you need a third and a fourth, for instance? Or is it time to turn to other characters?” It's a rhetorical question, of course, as the highly respected executive is openly questioning Marvel's largely profitable strategy of pumping out threequels (from 2013's Iron Man 3 to last month's Quantumania) and the odd fourquel (2022's terrible Thor: Love and Thunder). But is he right? And if he isn't, what should Marvel's approach be after suffering a rare, and very public, failure?
Is Iron Man 4 now off the table?

Read more