Skip to main content

A.I. fail as robot TV camera follows bald head instead of soccer ball

CaleyJags : SPFL Championship : Real Highlights: ICTFC 1 v 1 AYR : 24/10/2020

While artificial intelligence (A.I.) has clearly made astonishing strides in recent years, the technology is still susceptible to the occasional fail.

Recommended Videos

Take this recent soccer match in Scotland between Inverness Caledonian Thistle and Ayr United.

With stadiums closed to fans due to the coronavirus pandemic, Inverness recently decided to start livestreaming its games. Instead of employing a human camera operator, it opted instead to use an A.I.-powered robot camera designed to automatically follow the soccer ball.

But the game had hardly got underway when it became apparent that the robot camera was having trouble telling the difference between the shiny round soccer ball and the assistant referee’s shiny round head.

As a result, the camera kept panning toward the assistant referee’s bald head instead of the ball, causing much annoyance among fans watching at home, each of whom had paid 10 British pounds (about $13) to watch the game (or bald head, as it turned out).

According to local news media, fans wasted little time in venting their frustration online, with some demanding that match officials wear wigs or hats if the robot camera is used for future games.

One fan even took the time to cobble together a bunch of clips showing “the real highlights” of the Inverness/Ayr clash, which, incidentally, ended in a 1-1 draw. The video (top) shows the A.I. camera constantly drifting toward the assistant referee’s hairless pate, with the all-important ball apparently less ball-like than the match official’s noggin.

There are brief moments where it seems as if the camera has finally worked out what to do, but then it suddenly switches direction and moves once again toward the oblivious match official.

Digital Trends has reached out to Pixellot for more information on why its technology failed to tell the difference between a ball and a bald head and we will update this article when we hear back.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more