Skip to main content

Facebook forced to pay $550 million settlement over facial recognition lawsuit

Facebook is going to have to pay quite a few people money as part of the settlement of a facial-recognition lawsuit. The catch is you have to live in Illinois.

Illinois has some of the strictest biometric privacy laws, and a 2015 lawsuit alleges that the social network violated these laws through the use of facial-recognition software in its photo tag feature without people’s consent. Illinois’ 2008 law requires companies to obtain permission before using people’s biometric data and be transparent with how the data is used and kept.

Once the settlement is approved by a judge, Facebook will have to shell out $550 million to people in Illinois, which the Chicago Tribune said will result in each person affected getting up to a couple of hundred dollars.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Attorney Jay Edelson, whose firm represents some of those who filed in the 2015 lawsuit, told the Chicago Tribune that those eligible for a claim would be directly notified.

“We are expecting a record number of claims to be filed,” Edelson told the Tribune. “But even with that, we think that the class members are going to get a good amount of money.”

February court date

The payout timeline will be set during a February 6 court date. Illinois residents can most likely expect to start being notified about the claim in a month.

A Facebook spokesperson told Digital Trends that it chose a settlement over going to trial.

“We decided to pursue a settlement, as it was in the best interest of our community and our shareholders to move past this matter,” the spokesperson said.

Facebook has been in hot water over its use of facial recognition software before. The technology used in the photo tagging feature was, in part, a reason for Facebook having to pay the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) a historic $5 billion settlement last summer. The FTC said Facebook misrepresented users’ ability to control how their photos were used for facial recognition.

You’ve probably used the feature before: Facial recognition software matches faces in your photos to you or your friends and suggests people to tag. 

In September, Facebook announced that it would stop using facial recognition by default on your photos and tagging suggestions. Users can easily opt-in or opt-out of the tag suggestion feature and those who do not have the feature on will not appear in suggested tags or the Photo Review feature.

Editors' Recommendations

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Microsoft won’t sell facial recognition technology to police

Following in other tech giants’ footsteps, Microsoft announced it would not sell its facial recognition surveillance software to law enforcement. 

Microsoft President Brad Smith made the announcement Thursday during a live interview with The Washington Post. 

Read more
Amazon bans police from using facial recognition tech Rekognition for 1 year
Amazon Logo

Amazon has barred police from using its facial recognition technology for one year.

In a company blog post Wednesday, Amazon said it will implement a one-year "moratorium on police use of Amazon’s facial recognition technology" -- known as Rekognition.

Read more
IBM will no longer develop or research facial recognition tech
IBM's Summit Supercomputer

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna says the company will no longer develop or offer general-purpose facial recognition or analysis software. In a June 8 letter addressed to Congress and written in support of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020, Krishna advocates for new reforms that support the responsible use of technology -- and combat systematic racial injustice and police misconduct.

“IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms, or any purpose which is not consistent with our values and Principles of Trust and Transparency,” wrote Krishna in the letter.

Read more