Skip to main content

Houseparty could be a digital privacy nightmare, experts warn

 

Video chatting app Houseparty has boomed in popularity in the last two weeks, but experts say users could inadvertently be sharing more personal data than they realize.

Recommended Videos

“Anybody who decides to use the Houseparty application to stay in contact during quarantine needs to be aware that the app collects a worrying amount of personal information,” Ray Walsh, digital privacy expert at the U.K.-based ProPrivacy, said in a statement to Digital Trends. “This includes geo-location data — which could in theory be used to map the location of each user.”

The app, which launched in 2016, reported 2 million downloads last week alone and has become particularly popular among teenagers, who use its informal structure and games to socialize while socially distancing to stop the spread of coronavirus, officially known as COVID-19.

But many users don’t realize how much information Houseparty gathers on its users, Walsh said. He was particularly concerned about what kind of data would be collected if a user were to link a Houseparty account to any other social media accounts that could further collect data from users.

Houseparty App
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It’s also possible that the U.S. government could begin surveilling the app because of its use of geolocation and popularity, he added.

“If the pandemic continues for any prolonged period, the chances that apps like this could be placed under surveillance to monitor how COVID-19 is spreading is a very real possibility,” Walsh wrote.

Gehan Gunasekara, an associate professor in commercial law at the University of Auckland, told Radio New Zealand that Houseparty was a “Trojan horse.”

“You’re essentially allowing this app to access your smartphone and your smartphone tells a lot about you, your movement, your locations, your contacts, how often you contact people, who you communicate with, and they’ll be able to basically track your every move,” he told the site.

Data and privacy expert Suzanne Vergnolle said in a Twitter thread on Houseparty’s privacy and permissions that the app was also likely not compliant with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Vergnolle added the app was tracking users by default and said requests for data deletion may or may not be honored.

Houseparty hasn’t updated its privacy policy since June 2018, two weeks after GDPR was implemented.

Houseparty did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Digital Trends.

Epic Games, the makers of the massively popular online game Fortnite, bought Houseparty in June 2019.

The CEO of Houseparty, Sima Sistani, at the time said in a statement that Houseparty and Epic “have a common vision to make human interaction easier and more enjoyable, and always with respect for user privacy.”

But Epic Games has previously been under the microscope over privacy concerns of its own.

According to the open-source privacy tracking website PrivacySpy, Epic Games has a dismal 2.3 out of 10 rating for its privacy practices, including allowing third-party access to personal data, and not notifying users in the event of a data breach. The Epic Games store also ran up against the European Union’s then-newly implemented GDPR rules in 2018.

Fortunately, it’s not hard for users to mitigate Houseparty’s lax privacy settings. ProPrivacy noted that users can simply turn location data off and make any and all chat rooms private.

Maya Shwayder
I'm a multimedia journalist currently based in New England. I previously worked for DW News/Deutsche Welle as an anchor and…
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more