Skip to main content

Lawyers in latest sexual assault lawsuit against Lyft expect more women to join

Lyft is being sued by a group of more than 20 women who say they were raped or sexually assaulted while using the ridesharing service. This is the second such lawsuit against the company in four months. The story was first reported by the Washington Post.

Mike Bomberger, a partner at the California law firm Estey and Bomberger LLC, told Digital Trends that in 80 percent of these complaints, the women were drunk or somehow vulnerable, and the driver assaulted or raped them in the vehicle.

Related Videos

Estey and Bomberger runs the website, and is also representing the plaintiffs in a class-action suit filed against Lyft in September that involves 14 women with similar complaints.

“We have over 100 complaints, and we anticipate more,” Bomberger said. “We will be filing more lawsuits.”

A Lyft spokesperson told Digital Trends in a statement that the company has implemented 15 new features to boost safety, including continuing criminal background checks and in-app emergency assistance.

“What these women describe is something no one should ever have to endure. Everyone deserves the ability to move about the world safely, yet women still face disproportionate risks,” the spokesperson said. “We recognize these risks, which is why we are relentless in our work to build safety into every aspect of our work. That means continually investing in new features and policies to protect our riders and drivers.”

In September, days after the last class-action suit was filed, the company announced it was partnering with the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, and mandating driver education. In May, it announced that a panic button was being added to the app.

Such fixes depend on a user being awake and able to access their app. Bomberger said a more effective fix may be one Uber began rolling out last month: Recording the rides. All of the rides.

“If an employee knows they’re being recorded, the rate of assaults go down exponentially,” he said. “Right now, Lyft is trying to initiate safety features that you use only after the assault has started. Let’s try the novel idea of preventing the assault before it’s started.”

Bomberger said that at the very least, they hope to force Lyft to admit to the high numbers of people who have experienced similar assaults. “We’re expecting Lyft to try to do what they’ve done for five years, which is conceal the number of people assaulted in their vehicles,” he said. There are currently no public numbers as to how many people are assaulted in rideshare vehicles every year.

“Based on what we’ve heard from cities and states around the country, we know the number is in the thousands,” Bomberger said. “I’ve had hundreds of calls since September.”

Editors' Recommendations

Facebook is dealing with more than 50,000 cases of revenge porn every month
Crisis Response Hub

Facebook has come a long way since its days of connecting college students to those in other dorms. More than a decade and a billion users later, the social network has become a powerful hub of content, but with that power comes great responsibility. And those who must bear the brunt of that responsibility are tasked with the rather onerous duty of evaluating potential cases of revenge pornography and "sextortion" -- more than 50,000 times a month.

Per a leaked document first obtained by The Guardian, the social media platform ultimately disabled more than 14,000 accounts as a result of sexual abuse, with 33 of the cases involving children. While these may seem like gargantuan numbers, they could represent just the tip of the iceberg. The Guardian reports that because abusive content must be reported (and is not proactively sought out), the true extent of abuse on the platform could be far larger than even Facebook realizes.

Read more
Twitter drops lawsuit against U.S. government to block unmasking critic account

Twitter filed suit against the U.S. government on Thursday in an effort to block the unmasking of an anonymous Twitter user who has been posting messages criticizing the government and current administration. That lawsuit didn't last long: the social media platform withdrew the motion shortly thereafter, and the government itself pulled back on its original request to reveal the identity of the anonymous critic.

According to Twitter, it first received a notice from the government requiring it to reveal the identity of a Twitter user going under the handle @ALT_uscis. The account is allegedly one of several set up by people claiming to be ex-government employees or current employees, and is particularly critical of recent immigration policies.

Read more
Microsoft wins partial victory, can pursue lawsuit against U.S. government
microsoft sues us government gag orders 2

In April, Microsoft sued the U.S. government over the right to let its customers know when authorities had requested access and are going through their email accounts. According to Microsoft, government gag orders that prevent the company from keeping customers informed infringe on Constitutional rights and should be prohibited.

A little less than a year later, Microsoft has won a small victory, with a federal court ruling that the company can continue its lawsuit. In a recent ruling, federal judge James Robart upheld Microsoft's First Amendment assertions but turned down the company's claim to Fourth Amendment protection, ZDNet reports.

Read more