Skip to main content

Bloomberg thinks other Democrats want to break up big tech ‘just to be nasty’

Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg thinks Big Tech companies have too much power, but doesn’t believe that breaking them up is the answer. 

In an interview published by the San Francisco Bay Area’s Mercury News on Friday, the former mayor of New York City said that he disagrees with other candidates like Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders on how to handle Big Tech. 

“Breaking things up just to be nasty is not an answer,” Bloomberg said. “You’ve got to have a good reason and how it would work, and I don’t hear that from anybody, the senator or anybody else.”

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Bloomberg himself owns a massive tech and media conglomerate, Bloomberg L.P., and owes his billions to the Bloomberg Terminal, a computer system that provides financial data to stock traders and other financial professionals.

While he did say some tech companies have too much power, he added that he would want to look more closely at how antitrust regulations could apply to those companies.

“It’s probably true that we shouldn’t have let Facebook buy the last big acquisition they made,” he said.

Bloomberg gave more insight into his tech policy during a supporter rally in Monterey, California. The Mercury News reports that he said he wants to see tech companies have similar legal requirements and policies as media outlets. 

“The rules that apply to your publication, in terms of what your responsibilities are for whatever you distribute to the public, should also apply to [tech companies],” he said. “And when they say, ‘Well, our system is such that we have a million-billion things coming through it, we can’t do it,’ well, change your business model.”

Bloomberg’s views on Big Tech differ from some of the Democratic front-runners. 

Warren has been vocal about her stance on Big Tech and made a call to break the companies up a part of her presidential campaign. Warren’s proposal would explicitly break up bigger companies, including forcing Amazon to give up control of Whole Foods and splitting Instagram and WhatsApp from Facebook. Sanders has similar ideas, saying he would appoint an attorney general who could both investigate and break up the biggest tech companies. 

Pete Buttigieg, former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, said last week that there’s a strong case for breaking up Facebook, and added that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has too much power. 

Some Democratic presidential candidates, including Sanders and entrepreneur Andrew Yang, are calling for more regulation of Big Tech.

Digital Trends reached out to Bloomberg’s campaign to find out specifics about how he would regulate Big Tech if he was elected President. We will update this story once we hear back. 

Editors' Recommendations

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
How Intel and Microsoft are teaming up to take on Apple
An Intel Meteor Lake system-on-a-chip.

It seems like Apple might need to watch out, because Intel and Microsoft are coming for it after the latter two companies reportedly forged a close partnership during the development of Intel Lunar Lake chips. Lunar Lake refers to Intel's upcoming generation of mobile processors that are aimed specifically at the thin and light segment. While the specs are said to be fairly modest, some signs hint that Lunar Lake may have enough of an advantage to pose a threat to some of the best processors.

Today's round of Intel Lunar Lake leaks comes from Igor's Lab. The system-on-a-chip (SoC), pictured above, is Intel's low-power solution made for thin laptops that's said to be coming out later this year. Curiously, the chips weren't manufactured on Intel's own process, but on TSMC's N3B node. This is an interesting development because Intel typically sticks to its own fabs, and it even plans to sell its manufacturing services to rivals like AMD. This time, however, Intel opted for the N3B node for its compute tile.

Read more
How much does an AI supercomputer cost? Try $100 billion
A Microsoft datacenter.

It looks like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Sora, among other projects, are about to get a lot more juice. According to a new report shared by The Information, Microsoft and OpenAI are working on a new data center project, one part of which will be a massive AI supercomputer dubbed "Stargate." Microsoft is said to be footing the bill, and the cost is astronomical as the name of the supercomputer suggests -- the whole project might cost over $100 billion.

Spending over $100 billion on anything is mind-blowing, but when put into perspective, the price truly shows just how big a venture this might be: The Information claims that the new Microsoft and OpenAI joint project might cost a whopping 100 times more than some of the largest data centers currently in operation.

Read more
There’s an unexpected, new competitor in PC gaming
Snapdragon's X Elite PC SoC.

Windows gaming on ARM is becoming a legitimate possibility, and it's not just thanks to the recently unveiled emulation options, but it's chiefly due to the fact that Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite is shaping up to be pretty excellent. Spotted in a recent benchmark, the CPU was seen beating some of the best processors on the current market. Are we finally at a point where it's not always going to be a choice between just Intel and AMD?

The benchmarks were posted by user @techinmul on Twitter, and the results couldn't be more promising for the upcoming Qualcomm processor. The chip was tested in Geekbench 6, and although it's important not to take these results entirely at face value, it's an impressive show of performance that bodes well for upcoming thin and light laptops.

Read more