Skip to main content

Online gambler wins 3-year legal battle for massive payout

How would you feel if you won a $2.3 million jackpot playing online blackjack and then the company operating the game refused to pay because it claimed the win was the result of a software malfunction?

Well, this is exactly what happened to Brit Andrew Green in 2018. Naturally, he couldn’t accept the explanation, and so he took it to court. This week, after a prolonged legal battle, the company has finally been forced to pay up.

Recommended Videos

It all started when Green, 54, won the jackpot on a game called Frankie Dettori’s Magic Seven on an app operated by British betting firm Betfred and its parent company, Gibraltar-based Petfre.

When he saw he’d won 1.8-million British pounds, Green made a beeline for his local pub to celebrate with friends, racking up a £2,500 ($3,400) bill in the process. Betfred even called up to offer congratulations on the win and offer financial advice.

But several days later, a company executive contacted Green to say the company wouldn’t be paying out as the app had suffered an error that caused the game to malfunction.

Instead, Betfred offered Green £60,000 ($82,000) as a goodwill gesture but insisted that he should never mention the incident again. But the online gambler refused the offer and went down the legal route in a bid to secure his winnings.

During the case, Betfred insisted that the software error, which prevented the game from properly resetting during Green’s gaming session, was covered by the game’s terms and conditions, the BBC reported.

But the court determined that the wording on this point was “inadequate” and “not transparent or fair” and therefore Betfred was not entitled to use this as an argument.

After hearing from both sides, the U.K.’s High Court this week ruled in Green’s favor, forcing Betfred to pay up.

“Mr Green won the jackpot three times whilst playing a game provided by one of our third-party suppliers,” the company said after the case ended. “The supplier reported a software problem to us and advised that we should withhold payment. However, we will abide by the court’s decision and not appeal. We would like to apologize to Mr. Green for the delay in receiving his money.”

In a statement, Green said the stress of the case had caused him to suffer both mentally and physically over the last few years.

“Along with my family, I have been through some very low times and become very down,” he said. “My physical health has also suffered badly, and I sometimes wished I’d never won this money because it was just making my life a misery.”

Green added, “The champagne can finally come off ice and be savored.”

Green’s lawyer said the ruling would “give hope to others who may be thinking that the big, rich guys always win.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more