Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Twitter hides Trump tweet threatening ‘serious force’ against protesters

Add as a preferred source on Google

Twitter hid a tweet by President Donald Trump about deploying “serious force” against protesters in Washington, D.C. for violating the platform’s policy against threats of harm, the latest in a series of moderation moves by Twitter to address controversial statements from the president.

“There will never be an ‘Autonomous Zone’ in Washington, D.C., as long as I’m your President. If they try they will be met with serious force!” Trump tweeted early Tuesday. 

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Trump’s tweet refers to an autonomous zone, an area where a group of people declares to be self-governing and free of police.

Recommended Videos

A public interest notice was issued on Trump’s tweet from Tuesday for violating rules against abusive behavior. To see Trump’s tweet, you have to click on the “View” button of the Tweet’s notice about abusive behavior.

“We’ve placed a public interest notice on this Tweet for violating our policy against abusive behavior, specifically, the presence of a threat of harm against an identifiable group,” Twitter’s Safety team wrote.

Twitter told Digital Trends it doesn’t allow its users to wish or hope serious harm against either a person or a group of people — in this case, against people trying to organize at protests.

Trump’s tweet can’t be replied to or liked, though you can still retweet it with a comment.

Digital Trends reached out to Twitter for further comment on their decision to place a notice on this tweet. We will update this story when we hear back. 

Last month, Twitter added a fact-check note to a pair of Trump’s tweets about mail-in ballots. That same week, Twitter hid and issued a public notice on Trump’s tweet about the Minnesota protests for the “glorification of violence.” 

In that tweet, Trump stated, “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

Trump signed an executive order late last month in response to Twitter flagging his tweets, adding that he would shut down Twitter if he could. The order targeted social media platforms, pushing to make them liable for content posted onto their sites, and ordering the Federal Trade Commission and the attorney general to begin investigating the companies.

The order would make social media companies like Facebook and Twitter legally responsible for what others say and do on their platform, opening them up to civil lawsuits.

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Meta’s new AI can generate images of you from your Instagram, and you’re opted in 
Meta's approach to Instagram likeness rights with Muse Image raises questions that a watermark alone doesn't answer.
Instagram Muse Image

Meta launched Muse Image on July 7, 2026, and while it’s an exciting development, buried inside all the announcements is something that deserves a closer look. 

If your Instagram account is public, strangers can use your photos to generate AI images of you via Muse Image. More importantly, it's switched on by default.

Read more
Meta’s new image and video AI tools let you turn Instagram into your creative mood board
Two models, one launch, and an Instagram trick nobody else has.
Art, Collage, Face

Meta has been cooking something up, and today, it finally put it on the table. On July 7, 2026, Meta Superintelligence Labs launched Muse Image and Muse Video (in preview), its first in-house media generation models. 

The rollout comes with a few features that are genuinely hard to argue with.

Read more
Social media ban for young users is proving to be an age verification nightmare
A fake birthday is enough to beat Australia's social media ban on teens.
Social media apps on smartphone

Australia’s world-first teen social media ban was supposed to keep children under 16 away from popular platforms, including Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and X. While this was a major controversial change, it appears that getting around it was barely even a challenge.

Researchers created 50 test accounts across nine of the ten platforms covered by the law. Each account claimed its user was 16, the minimum permitted age. None of the platforms asked the researchers to provide proof or complete another age-assurance check. Only the Australian livestreaming platform Kick refused to create an account without a proper age verification.

Read more