Skip to main content

Study shows minorities use Twitter to voice issues ahead of mainstream coverage

Trust of major news outlets on Twitter is low, yet Twitter users often share concerns on certain issues before they are picked up by those same mainstream outlets.

In the largest study of Twitter conversations from three minority communities yet conducted, a report commissioned by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and published on February 27 shared insights into Twitter’s role in the news cycle. The study comes as multiple social media platforms continue an ongoing fight against fake news.

Recommended Videos

The study looks at three social media subcultures, what the group has named Black Twitter, Feminist Twitter, and Asian American Twitter. The researchers looked at over 46 million tweets from hashtags related to those communities during 2015 and 2016. Using human analysis alongside software to pick up patterns in the data, the group also conducted interviews among both community members and journalists. The results of the study are available in a full report and an interactive website created by Postlight, which includes interactive graphs on the biggest hashtags used in the study.

In one of the key findings, the study’s author’s suggest that Twitter gives a voice to those subcultures, serving as a platform to share either before a topic is picked up by major news outlets or to share with their own commentary. On the flip side, the interviews highlighted how many journalists use Twitter for insight — and even embed tweets into articles as a look at how the community is reacting to the topic. (The latter, the study suggests, makes some Twitter users uncomfortable because the practice could potentially open up the original tweeter to harassment, and could also raise intellectual property concerns).

While fake news is continually making headlines as social media platforms make changes in the wake of the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. election, the study suggests that Twitter users are more concerned with the framing of the story. Many of the tweets in the study were wary of which data was emphasized over others.

After reviewing 23 major news outlets, the study suggests Twitter users are two times more likely to tweet a negative view rather than a positive one. The analysis also suggested that the number of times a news story was shared wasn’t tied to an “approval rating,” because only one of the most shared news outlets in the study actually had a favorable rating.

“A strong future for journalism is dependent on accurate reporting that reflects the stories and concerns of all of our communities,” LaSharah Bunting, Knight Foundation director for journalism, said in a press release. “The report offers a window into how some of these communities interact with the news on their own terms, opening an opportunity for journalists to connect with their audiences in new and different ways.”

The full report is available online.

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more