Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Android
  4. Buying Guides
  5. Mobile
  6. Evergreens

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Pixel 3a vs. Pixel 3 vs. Pixel 2: Which Google phone is perfect for you?

Add as a preferred source on Google

Pixel 3a Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

Fans of the Google Nexus range have something to be excited about: There’s a new midrange Google phone in town, and it’s a beauty. The Pixel 3a has been revealed at Google I/O 2019, and it has everything we loved about the Google Pixel 3 wrapped up in a more affordable bundle. But price is only one part of the story, and there are inevitable comparisons with the new phone’s stablemates. So within the pint-sized Pixel pantheon, which phone comes out on top? We compared the Google Pixel 3a, the Pixel 3, and the Pixel 2 to find out.

Specs

Pixel 3a Pixel 3 Pixel 2
Size 151.3 x 70.1 x 8.2 mm (6.0 x 2.8 x 0.3 inches) 145.6 x 68.2 x 7.9 mm (5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches) 145.7 x 69.7 x 7.8 mm (5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches)
Weight 147 grams (5.19 ounces) 148 grams (5.22 ounces) 143 grams (5.04 ounces)
Screen size 5.6-inch gOLED 5.5-inch OLED 5-inch OLED
Screen resolution 2,220 x 1,080 pixels (441 pixels per inch) 2,160 x 1,080 pixels (443 pixels per inch) 1,920 x 1,080 pixels (441 pixels per inch)
Operating system Android 9.0 Pie Android 9.0 Pie Android 9.0 Pie
Storage space 64GB 64GB, 128GB 64GB, 128GB
MicroSD card slot No No No
Tap-to-pay services Google Pay Google Pay Google Pay
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
RAM 4GB 4GB 4GB
Camera Single 12.2MP rear, 8MP front camera Single 12.2MP rear, dual 8MP and 8MP front camera Single 12.2MP rear, 8MP front camera
Video 2160p at 30 frames per second, 1080p at 120 fps, 720p at 240 fps 2160p at 30 frames per second, 1080p at 120 fps, 720p at 240 fps 2160p at 30 frames per second, 1080p at 120 fps, 720p at 240 fps
Bluetooth version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
Ports USB-C, 3.5mm audio jack USB-C USB-C
Fingerprint sensor Yes (rear-mounted) Yes (rear-mounted) Yes (rear-mounted)
Water resistance Splash resistant IP68 IP67
Battery 3,000mAh

18W fast charging

2,915mAh

Fast charging

Qi wireless charging

2,700mAh

Fast charging

App marketplace Google Play Store Google Play Store Google Play Store
Network support T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, Sprint AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Verizon T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, Sprint
Colors Just Black, Clearly White, Purple-ish Just Black, Clearly White, Not Pink Kinda Blue, Just Black, Clearly White
Price $400 $800 $650
Buy from Google Google, Amazon Amazon
Review score 4.5 out of 5 stars 4.5 out of 5 stars 4 out of 5 stars

Performance, battery life, and charging

Google Pixel 3 review
Simon Hill/Digital Trends

Stock Android makes judging these phones difficult. A Pixel is always going to be super-smooth to use, and these three phones are no exception. There’s a winner in terms of objective power though, with the Pixel 3’s Snapdragon 845 making short work of the Pixel 2’s older Snapdragon 835. The Pixel 3a uses the midrange Snapdragon 670, which simply won’t match the Pixel 3’s strength — though it does surprisingly well against the Pixel 2’s benchmark scores.

Battery capacity has been steadily increasing, with the Pixel 3a sporting the largest battery of the three here. Unlike the Pixel 3, there’s never any need for battery anxiety, and the midrange phone performs excellently, providing good battery life for a solid day’s work. Charging is where the latest flagship starts to pull away; all three sport Google’s fast charging, but only the Pixel 3 comes with convenient Qi wireless charging.

While all three are very smooth performers, the Pixel 3’s more powerful processor and Qi wireless charging win it this round.

Winner: Pixel 3

Design and durability

Google’s designs for the Pixel range have generally split opinion, with many branding the phones as ugly. They have a point — Google was slow to embrace the design trends adopted by other manufacturers, and so none of these phones are a match for the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the iPhone XS. The Pixel 2 is the worst of these three due to extensive bezels. The Pixel 3 and 3a are the better-looking by far, with slimmer bezels. The Pixel 3a is also the only phone to include a headphone jack.

The Pixel 3a is made from polycarbonate, while the Pixel 3 and Pixel 2 are made from more luxurious materials. The Pixel 3 is all glass, while the Pixel 2 has an aluminum body with a glass panel at the top. The glass sections will be fragile of course, but the Pixel 2’s aluminum and the Pixel 3a’s polycarbonate are likely to be more durable over time. Still, a case is recommended for all three. The Pixel 3 has an advantage in waterproofing too, thanks to an IP68-rating that’s slightly superior to the Pixel 2’s IP67-rating. The Pixel 3a only has splash- and dust-resistance, so won’t survive submersion.

It’s a tougher round to call, with a lot going for each phone. However, we think the Pixel 3’s more attractive design and strong waterproofing put it ahead here.

Winner: Pixel 3

Display

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

Google has compromised in some areas to bring the Pixel 3a’s price down to midrange levels, but the display doesn’t seem to be one of those areas. It’s a 5.6-inch gOLED display in an 18.5:9 aspect ratio with a 2,280 x 1,080 resolution. It’s slightly larger than the Pixel 3’s 5.5-inch display, and considerably larger than the Pixel 2’s 5-inch display. The larger size means it’s not quite as sharp as the flagships, but as an OLED, you can be sure it comes with a great color range and inky blacks.

While the Pixel 3a puts up a strong fight, we favor the Pixel 3’s screen.

Winner: Pixel 3

Camera

Pixel 3a Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

Despite sticking with a single rear-facing lens, the camera has always been one of the Pixel range’s biggest strengths. Each phone comes with the now iconic 12.2-megapixel main lens, featuring a great portrait mode, A.I. optimization, and software tricks like Night Sight and Top Shot. The Pixel 3 and 2 have an edge thanks to the Visual Core feature, which boosts processing times and overall camera performance. But it’s important to note that all three phones offer a great camera experience.

The Pixel 3a and Pixel 2 come with a similar 8-megapixel selfie lens — though the Pixel 3a’s has a fixed focus — but the Pixel 3’s additional selfie lens gives it another edge. The Pixel 3 sports two 8-megapixel lenses, the second of which has a wide-angle lens that allows it to take pictures of large groups. This additional lens paired with its Visual Core scores the Pixel 3 the win here, but it’s a close contest.

Winner: Pixel 3

Software and updates

Google Pixel 3
Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

As the Pixel is Google’s own device, it’s only right you’d find the latest version of Android 9.0 Pie on these phones. It’ll be exactly the same version of Android Pie no matter which phone you pick up right now, as Google is exceptionally good at pushing updates out to its phones regularly and on time. Each phone gets three years of major Android upgrades and security updates from its release date, so while the Pixel 2 will be the first of these three phones to stop receiving updates, it will definitely receive Android 10 Q, and might even stretch to Android R in 2020. As such, there’s not much need to worry about getting value for your money, even when picking up the Pixel 2.

There’s no way to pick between these three choices here, as they’re all exactly the same.

Winner: Tie

Special features

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

But it’s the newer phones that pull slightly ahead. The Pixel 3 comes with support for the Google Pixel Stand to turn your phone into a smart display, while the Pixel 3a will be the first phone to come with support for Google Maps’ new AR mode. While the Pixel 2 is by no means lacking in features, it’s the newer ones that pull ahead here.

Winner: Tie – Pixel 3a and Pixel 3

Price and availability

While the Pixel 2 is no longer available from Google itself, you can still pick it up from Amazon, with prices generally hovering around the $600 mark. It will work on most major U.S. networks. The Pixel 3 is currently available from a variety of retailers and carriers, including Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon, and T-Mobile. While it’s not available from AT&T, it’ll still work on its networks. Prices for the Pixel 3 start from $800. The Pixel 3a is a different beast from any Pixel before, as it’s a midrange phone. It costs $400 — or half the price of the Pixel 3 — and it has the same availability as the Pixel 3.

Overall winner: Google Pixel 3

In these sorts of comparisons, it’s usually the newest device that wins the day, but due to the large gulf in relative price, it’s the Pixel 3 that comes out on top. That’s not all that surprising really since the Pixel 3 is Google’s flagship device, and while the Pixel 3a is newer, it’s aimed at a more budget-conscious audience and simply can’t match the Pixel 3’s power, luxurious design, and exceptionally strong camera.

But it’s closer than you think, and the Pixel 3a holds up extremely well against its more powerful and expensive cousins. The Snapdragon 670 chip is likely to surprise you with its capabilities, and its camera is close to being on par with the Pixel 3. Where the Pixel 3a falls down is on build materials, waterproofing, and a lack of Qi wireless charging. But it is $400 cheaper, and if you don’t mind making those sacrifices in the name of an exceptional camera, strong performance, and good battery life, then the Pixel 3a may win out for you here.

If money is no object, it should always be the Pixel 3. It’s a straight upgrade to the Pixel 2, and it outclasses the Pixel 3a. The Pixel 3 is an excellent phone and our worthy winner.

Mark Jansen
Former Mobile Evergreen Editor
Mark Jansen is an avid follower of everything that beeps, bloops, or makes pretty lights. He has a degree in Ancient &…
Apple quietly hopes to end the gizmo right-to-repair war. The iPhone Duo is the latest specimen.
The right-to-repair movement has entered its fine-print era.
iPhone Duo on MagSafe mount with screen half open

Not long ago, Apple treated independent repair like an act of outright hostility. The Cupertino giant locked down parts with serial-number pairing, while repair tools remained firmly out of reach of anyone outside its authorized repair network. More importantly, the company waged a legal and lobbying battle against right-to-repair legislation.

I've covered enough of these fights over the years to know what a shift looks like. That's why what happened in October 2026 genuinely caught me off guard. The day the iPhone Duo went on sale, what may be the most mechanically complex iPhone to date, Apple pulled off a surprising about-face. It published teardown-style repair manuals for a handful of major components.

Read more
iPhone Duo is here. Let’s take a moment to appreciate the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and all the things it didn’t break
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is not without its flaws, but in the face of the iPhone Duo, I have discovered more appreciation for it.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8

Apple's first foldable phone is now on shelves, in short supply, but with an unreal amount of buzz around it. After all, it's the first foldable iPhone, and there's plenty that this phone gets right. But there's also a lot that is either broken or underwhelming. What's peculiar is the dialogue around this phone, and how it has completely overshadowed every other attempt at making a phone with a similar form factor.

I've spent some time with the iPhone Duo, and I've used the Galaxy Z Fold 8 for almost three months now. In my opinion, Samsung deserves more credit. When the Galaxy Z Fold 8 arrived earlier this year, it was celebrated in some circles and ridiculed in others for supposedly copying what Apple would eventually deliver with the iPhone Duo. The dialogue was pretty odd, for multiple reasons. Samsung has been making foldable phones for years, so claiming that it copied a product Apple hadn't even launched was simply absurd.

Read more
Buying a cheap Samsung Galaxy phone could soon get a lot harder
Samsung is reportedly cutting Galaxy A production as rising memory costs make affordable phones harder to build.
A person holding the Samsung Galaxy A56 and Galaxy A55.

For years, Samsung’s Galaxy A phones have been some of the easiest recommendations for anyone who wants to go the Android route without paying flagship prices. But that part of the lineup could soon become harder to find at a good price.

According to South Korea’s Electronic Times, Samsung is cutting Galaxy A production by about 20% in the fourth quarter compared to its original plans. Component orders have reportedly dropped by a similar amount, which could mean roughly 10 million fewer phones over the year. Samsung is also said to be considering another production cut of more than 10% next year.

Read more