Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Nikon Z 7 vs. Canon EOS R: Full-frame flagship mirrorless cameras compared

Both Nikon and Canon now have two choices in the full-frame mirrorless segment, with the Canon EOS R and Nikon Z 7 being the range-topping models, at least for now. While both cameras are the current flagships, the two don’t are not direct competitors. At $2,299, Canon’s EOS R is more closely matched with Nikon’s budget-friendly option, the Z 6, than the $3,400 Z 7. Yet, some specs are more closely aligned with the Z 7 than the Z 6.

Canon may have played it safe by launching cheaper mirrorless models — the EOS RP is even less, at $1,300 —  but there’s more to consider than price when looking for the better camera. Can the EOS R keep up with the more expensive Z 7? Let’s take a look at how these two cameras compare.

Read more: Nikon Z 6 vs. Canon EOS R vs. Sony A7 III

Canon EOS R

Canon EOS R

Nikon Z 7
nikon z6
Image used with permission by copyright holder


Sensor 30.3 megapixel full-frame sensor 45.7-megapixel full-frame sensor
Burst Speed up to 8 fps (5 fps with continuous AF) up to 9 fps (5.5 fps with viewfinder)
Shutter Speed 1/8000 to 30 sec. 1/8000 to 30 sec.
ISO 100 – 40,000 (50-102400 expanded) 100-25,600 (32-102400 expanded)
Autofocus Dual Pixel CMOS Phase Detection AF with up to 5,655 points; detection range -6 to +18 EV 493-point hybrid phase-detection contrast AF with AF assist beam; detection range -1 to +19 (-4 to +19 EV with low light AF mode)
Image Stabilization None (available in some lenses) 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization
Video 4K at 30 fps, 1.7x crop 4K at 30 fps, full frame or crop mode
Viewfinder 0.5-inch, 3.69 million dot EVF with 23mm eye point 0.5-inch, 3690k-dot OLED with eye sensor
LCD 3.15-inch, 2.1 million dot tilting touchscreen 3.2-inch, 2.1 million dot tilting touchscreen
Connectivity Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
Battery Li-ion rated at 330 shots Li-ion rated at 330 shots
Dimensions (WxHxD) 5.35 x 3.87 x3.32 5.3 x 4 x 2.7 inch
Weight 1.46 lbs. 1.29 lbs.
Kit Lens Available body only, or with a 24-105mm f/4 lens Available body only, or with a 24-70mm f/4
Price $2,299 (body only) $3,400 (body only)
Read more Canon EOS R Review Nikon Z 7 Review
Buy Now Amazon Amazon


Both the Canon EOS R and Nikon Z 7 use large, full-frame sensors, but there’s a significant difference in resolution. The Nikon Z 7 boasts a 45.7-megapixel sensor, the same resolution as the Nikon D850 DSLR. Those extra pixels are going to help capture fine detail and create more flexibility for cropping in postproduction.

The Canon EOS R doesn’t have quite the robust resolution of the Z 7, with 30.3 megapixels. There are some perks to shooting with less, however, including smaller file sizes, which means fitting more images on the same memory card. Lower resolution sensors also tend to do better in low light, although the Z 7 held up surprisingly well in low light considering the higher resolution.

Ultimately, your own needs dictate how many pixels you need, but there’s no denying that the Z 7 has the edge when you need to the most resolution you can get.

Winner: Nikon Z 7

Nikon Z6 Hands-on


Comparing the Z 7 and EOS R in speed requires a closer look at the fine print. Yes, the EOS R is just one frame behind the Z 7’s 9 fps, but not when using continuous autofocus. If you need to adjust the focus between frames (which is most scenarios where you’d want burst speed), the EOS R is limited to just 5 fps, whereas the Z 7 offers continuous autofocus at its full 9 fps speed.

But, the Z 7 has fine-print of its own. That maximum burst speed is too fast for both live view and autoexposure, meaning your exposure is locked on the first frame. This probably isn’t a huge deal in most continuous shooting scenarios, but if you’re following a subject as it moves from sunlight to shadow, it could pose a problem. You’ll need to drop down to 5.5 fps to use live view and autoexposure.

Looking at just the burst rates that maintain full operation, the Z 7 and EOS R are really only a half frame apart.

Winner: Nikon Z 7


Early mirrorless cameras couldn’t live up to the autofocus performance of DSLRs — and while that’s since changed, autofocus is naturally a big concern for photographers looking at either of these first-generation cameras. The Canon EOS R keeps up with the brand’s DSLR reputation using its Dual Pixel autofocus system, with over 5,000 individual AF points. In our real-world review, the EOS R quickly locked onto most subjects. The only area the mirrorless camera tended to focus a bit slower was with moving subjects in backlighting.

The Nikon Z 7 will also leave DSLR photographers no doubts — if the lighting conditions are good, anyways. In most scenarios, the Z 7 locked on easily thanks to its 493-point phase-detection AF system. Where the Z 7 struggled was in low light, with the autofocus speed slowing down compared to a DSLR, especially when limited lighting was combined with limited contrast. The Z 7 focuses in -1 EV lighting conditions, or -4 EV with a slower low light autofocus mode activated, while the EOS R’s native focus range goes down to -6 EV.

Winner: Canon EOS R

Canon EOS R Hands-on
Gannon Burgett/Digital Trends

Image Stabilization

One major feature swaying photographers over to mirrorless, besides the size advantage, is image stabilization. The Nikon Z 7, like Sony’s full-frame mirrorless shooters, includes five-axis in-body image stabilization. That allows photographers to get steady shots, even with non-stabilized lenses like Nikon’s beautiful but heavy 85mm f/1.4. Stabilization allows for lower shutter speeds instead of pushing up the ISO, which can increase image quality in low light settings

Canon, however, chose to skip in-body stabilization in the EOS R, which means if you want stabilization, you’ll have to find it in the lens. Fortunately, most native RF lenses do feature stabilization, but the Z 7’s in-body stabilization makes it more versatile.

Winner: Nikon Z 7


Both cameras build in 4K video at 30 fps. Both cameras also offer 10-bit output over HDMI with each company’s take on a logarithmic color profile, which preservers more dynamic range. But that’s where the similarities end.

The Nikon Z 7 can use either the full sensor or a 1.5x cropped region to record 4K video, while the Canon EOS R can only record 4K from a 1.7x crop. That crop factor gathers makes getting a wide-angle shot more difficult, and also cuts down the overall amount of light being gathered, reducing low light quality. The EOS R also suffers from pretty extreme rolling shutter distortion.

The Z 7 is actually not as good for video as the Z 6, but it still gives videographers the choice between full-frame or oversampled crop footage (which is sharper). An upcoming firmware update will also allow for RAW video output that can be captured in the ProRes RAW format in compatible Atomos HDMI recorders.

Winner: Nikon Z 7


While both models may be the first generation, neither brand is a stranger to designing cameras. Both the EOS R and Z 7 will feel familiar to photographers that have previously shot with the brand’s DSLRs. Both also use a tilting touchscreen (only the Canon’s is fully articulating) and very nice, 3.69-million-dot electronic viewfinders.

The Canon EOS R doesn’t have an autofocus joystick, instead using a multi-touch slider, which can be custom set to different controls. The slider has three shortcuts in one — you can tap either end to quickly recall programmed settings, or slide between ends to make adjustments. For example, we set it to control ISO, with ISO 100 at one end and 400 at the other, while sliding granted access to all other ISO values.

The Nikon Z 7 shares many design features with the D850, including the great AF joystick. In a teardown of the two cameras, Lens Rentals also noted that the Z 7 has sealed pretty much anything that could be sealed against the elements, while the EOS R has more limited weather-sealing just around the buttons and dials. Despite this, the Z 7 is also the lighter of the two cameras.

Both cameras also features a single memory card slot, but where the EOS R sticks with standard SD cards, the Z 7 uses the newer XQD format. XQD cards are not as widely available or affordable as SD cards, but they are much faster. Additionally, the Z 7 will gain support for the even faster CFExpress card format (which uses the same physical form factor as XQD) in an upcoming firmware update.

Ultimately, this category is going to come down between personal preference on how each model feels in the hands, but since we have to pick one, we’ll leave the Z 7 as the winner here for the lighter weight, more robust weather-sealing, autofocus joystick, and future-proof memory card support. If you shoot a lot of selfies or vlogs, you may prefer the EOS R for its full-articulating screen, though.

Winner: Nikon Z 7

Picking an overall winner

With a more than $1,000 price difference between the two, we’d be surprised if the pricier Nikon Z 7 didn’t overpower the EOS R in more categories. The Z 7 offers better resolution, better quality video with more options, 5-axis in-body stabilization, slightly better burst shooting, and more robust weather-sealing. The lower price point isn’t the only advantage to the EOS R, however, which has stronger autofocus, except in the case of continuous shooting. Canon has also confirmed that a higher-end, professional mirrorless model is on the way, which will likely be a better competitor to the Z 7 — although no details have yet been revealed.

As both the EOS R and Z series are new camera systems, it will take Canon and Nikon time to build up a sizable collection of lenses. For now, current Canon or Nikon DSLR owners should consider sticking with their respective brand when it comes to making the switch to mirrorless, as each Company offers full compatibility with existing DSLR lenses on their mirrorless bodies, via adapters.

Editors' Recommendations

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
Nikon Z 50 vs. Canon EOS M6 Mark II: Nikon’s newest takes on Canon’s champ
Canon EOS M6 Mark II

Just a year ago, choosing whether to buy a Canon or a Nikon crop-sensor mirrorless camera was an easy decision -- Canon was the only choice. That's changed with the introduction of the Nikon Z 50. A scaled-down version of Nikon's full-frame mirrorless cameras, the Z 50 mixes features from the high-end Z 6 and Z 7 with perks of a crop-sensor DSLR like the Nikon D7500.

But that "Mark II" in the Canon EOS M6 Mark II says a lot. This isn't Canon's first attempt at an APS-C mirrorless camera (it makes quite a few models in the EOS M line beyond the M6, as well). Boasting a 32-megapixel sensor and a compact body, the M6 II makes improvements where Nikon is only just getting started.

Read more
A9, A7R, S, II, or III? Making sense of Sony’s full-frame mirrorless cameras
Sony a9

Sony is a leader in mirrorless cameras with its full-frame Alpha series, but as the series has expanded to four models, choosing the right one can be confusing. In the current lineup, the A9 II, A7 III, A7R IV, and A7S II are all capable models, but each has unique advantages that may make it better or worse in any given situation.

The most obvious difference in these cameras is the sensor resolution, which varies considerably from the A7R IV’s 61 megapixels down to the A7S II’s 12. The A9 II and A7 III take up the middle spots with 24 megapixels, but the A9 boasts higher performance -- and a much higher price. With hands-on experience with nearly every full-frame Sony mirrorless model since the series launched in 2013, we've pinpointed the differences to help you figure out which is best for you.
Sony A9 II

Read more
Sony A7R IV vs. A7R III: An extra 20 megapixels isn’t the only difference
Sony A7R III

The Sony A7 series revolutionized mirrorless cameras as it was the first to use a full-frame sensor. The original A7R launched over six years ago and Sony has continued to improve on it, having released the fourth generation in 2019. The A7R IV comes 2 years after its predecessor, and while there are some striking differences, there are a number of similarities. Here's how the Sony A7R IV and A7R III compare.

The most significant difference in the Sony A7R IV is the sensor. Sony has never been lacking in this department, but it still decided to put a brand new sensor in the latest model. The A7R III's 42-megapixel sensor is no slouch, but the A7R IV packs in nearly 20 more megapixels with its 61MP unit. That makes it the highest-resolution full-frame sensor available, and is another groundbreaking move from Sony.

Read more