Skip to main content

Could expressing your religious views get you into legal trouble as a photographer?

photographer discriminated against same sex couple after refusing to shoot wedding polaroid mugshot

Working photographers try to take on as many jobs as they can, but does that mean they have to accept every commission that comes their way? Last week, New Mexico’s highest court has ruled that a photography company in New Mexico was in violation of state law after it declined to take pictures of a wedding ceremony, the Wall Street Journal reports, but the case is much more complex than that.

In 2006, photographer Elaine Huguenin and her husband Jonathan, owners of Elane Photography, refused a request to photograph a same-sex “commitment ceremony” because it was against their religious beliefs. The Huguenins are against same-sex marriage, and said that taking on the assignment would give the impression that they are in support of it. But the same-sex couple filed a discrimination complaint to the New Mexico Human Rights Commission, which found the Huguenins had indeed discriminated the couple based on their sexual orientation. New Mexico’s Human Rights Act states that any business offering a public service is prohibited from discriminating against and refusing service to anyone because of their sexual orientation, as well as race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, and gender.

Related Videos
Elaine and Jonathan Huguenin (image via Alliance Defending Freedom)
Elaine and Jonathan Huguenin (image via Alliance Defending Freedom)

The New Mexico Supreme Court agreed to hear the case on appeal, but it rejected the company’s claim that it was entitled to free speech and had a religious right to refuse to photograph the ceremony, and upheld the lower court’s original ruling.

“When Elane Photography refused to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony, it violated the NMHRA in the same way as if it had refused to photograph a wedding between people of different races,” the court wrote. “Even if the services it offers are creative or expressive, Elane Photography must offer its services to customers without regard for the customers’ race, sex, sexual orientation, or other protected classification.”

“This decision is a blow to our client and every American’s right to live free,” said Jordan Lorence, a senior counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom group who represented the Huguenins.

But Louise Melling of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said, “When you open a business, you are opening your doors to all people in your community, not just the select few who share your personal beliefs.”

Justice Richard C. Bosson, one of the presiding judges of the New Mexico Supreme Court, said the case “provokes reflection on what this nation is all about.” The company’s refusal, “no matter how religiously inspired, was an affront to the legal rights of that couple.”

“All of which, I assume, is little comfort to the Huguenins, who now are compelled by law to compromise the very religious beliefs that inspire their lives,” Justice Bosson wrote. “Though the rule of law requires it, the result is sobering. It will no doubt leave a tangible mark on the Huguenins and others of similar views.”

No doubt this case will have repercussions on all businesses operating in New Mexico, especially at a time when the nation is heavily engrossed in the issue of same-sex marriage. We often see signs where businesses proclaim they have the right to refuse service to anyone, but not if you’ve found to be in contempt of the law. The Huguenin’s could have easily declined the assignment without expressing their personal views, but in doing so, they found themselves in legal trouble.

What do you think? Should a photographer take on a job even if it’s against their personal views? Have the courts acted too strongly? Has the photographer’s First Amendment right been violated? Sound off in the comments.

(Main image via -Albachiaraa-/Shutterstock)

Editors' Recommendations

Selfie stick bans be damned, this museum wants you to get your duck face on
selfies museum art artinisland facebook featured

If you're bummed about recent bans on selfie sticks at many of the world's art institutions, pack your bags and head to Manila, the capital of the Philippines. There, you'll find Art In Island, billed as the world's first selfie museum (via Good).

But there's more to the place than just capturing your mug in front of art: The museum is an interactive, "touchable" space filled with 3D renderings of classic paintings, where visitors can become one with the art. Some of the paintings even have parts missing so spectators can assume the position to complete the image. Practice your ducky face next to Leonardo da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa” or let Instagrammers think you're a part of Vincent van Gogh’s “Starry Night." Think of it more as a Chuck E. Cheese's for art lovers than an extension of the Louvre. According to Hyperallergic, a complete tour of the museum takes roughly two hours so it's a quick breeze through art history.

Read more
This camera could help your bathroom mirror know when you’re hungover
omron hvc c camera internet of things hvcc

Imagine everything in your house being connected to a camera, and could asses your mood, what sort of music you may want to play, whether you were angry or sad, or if you had a heavy drinking session the night before. It would share all that data with apps on your smartphone, and silently change your environment to suit your mood. That’s what electrical products equipped with the Omron HVC-C could potentially do in the future.

Omron’s HVC-C - that’s Human Vision Components: Consumer Model - cameras use the firm’s own facial recognition technology, which goes way beyond knowing if you’re smiling or not. The camera module is small enough to fit in the palm of your hand, and designed to be integrated into almost any connected product in your home. Using Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, it’ll sync up with apps on your phone, which could automatically adjust equipment according to the data received.

Read more
Street photographer Bruce Gilden candidly tells you why your photos suck
street photographer bruce gilden candidly tells photos suck vice

As we know, art is subjective. What one views as a masterpiece, another may see it as garbage. Which is the beauty of art: it stirs our emotions and forces us to give an opinion. And criticism is something that Magum photographer Bruce Gilden doesn’t hold back. For a photo-critique show, Take it or Leave it with Bruce Gilden, Vice asked the Guggenheim Fellow about his thoughts on art photography and street photography – the latter being the medium Gilden, who has been shooting since 1968, is known for.

“In Take it or Leave it with Bruce Gilden, the eponymous photographer tells viewers whether the works of up-and-coming photographers are transcendent, total crap, or somewhere in-between,” Vice says about the new show. In each video, Gilden, who’s a Vice contributing photographer, offers brutally honest critiques about art that people have submitted.

Read more