Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. News

Can you spot the difference between a pro photographer and a fake?

Add as a preferred source on Google

In this day and age, with smartphones and selfie sticks, it seems like everyone is a photographer. If you ask most people, they would probably say they could tell the difference between a professional photographer and someone just claiming to be one. But, could you really?

Several people were put to that exact test in this recent video by Ben Lucas of Nom Creative, a Seattle-based portrait and headshot photography studio. In the video, Lucas brings in several people for a fake (although the people don’t know this) headshot competition between himself and another photographer. However, that other photographer isn’t a photographer at all, but an actress with no photography background at all.

Recommended Videos

So the question is, could these individuals tell the difference between the images taken by the professional and the images take by the fake?

nom-creative-fake-vs-pro
Certain tell-tale signs, like the way a person interacts with a subject or holds the camera, are giveaways in determining whether someone is a professional photographer. Nom Creative/YouTube

In this experiment, before even seeing the images most of the people were able to clearly note the differences between the two experiences, with most of the criticism aimed at the faux photographer for lack of posing guidance and other similar issues. But when it came to the actual images, the difference was even more apparent, with every single person correctly pointing out the professional image versus the faux image.

That is not to say that all of the images that the faux photographer took were bad, but the professional’s were better in every way, in every instance of this demonstration. This translates to the real world as well: A professional provides an experience and comes with skills that can help an individual really come out in their images.

Remember this video the next time that you find yourself in need of some images and you are comparing those bargain basement photographers to the established ones. Just because we all have access to digital cameras, that doesn’t mean we all have the skills to call ourselves a professional. The results speak for themselves.

Anthony Thurston
Anthony is an internationally published photographer based in the beautiful Pacific Northwest. Specializing primarily in…
RAMmageddon is coming for cameras, and your dream setup is in the crosshairs
Fujifilm's camera price hikes are just the latest sign of a DRAM crisis reshaping costs beyond smartphones and laptops.
Fujifilm's X100VI camera, released in 2024.

If you've been saving up for a new camera, I've got some bad news for you. Waiting until fall just got a lot more expensive. And this isn't some isolated issue troubling the camera industry. 

It's the same global chip crisis coming for basically everything with a processor and memory inside it.

Read more
Fujifilm Instax Mini 13 review: This instant camera won me over with its no-frills retro charm
From printing instant memories to rediscovering the fading charm of polaroids, Fujifilm's camera offers a budget route to a simple indulgence.
Fujifilm Instax mini 13 camera.

See at Amazon

Quick review

Read more
Want to try film photography? Kodak’s new $35 camera is a great place to start
This retro inspired Kodak EC35 camera keeps film photography refreshingly simple.
Kodak-EC35

If you've been curious about film photography but didn't want to spend a fortune, Kodak has a new camera worth checking out. The new Kodak EC35 is a reusable 35mm point-and-shoot camera that costs just $34.99, making it one of the most affordable ways to try shooting on film.

Developed by Reto Project under the Kodak brand, the EC35 keeps things simple with a lightweight design, automatic flash, and a pocket-friendly body. It also arrives as interest in analog photography continues to grow, offering beginners an inexpensive alternative to disposable film cameras.

Read more