Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. Web
  6. News

Facebook privacy lawsuit moves up to the Austrian Supreme Court

Add as a preferred source on Google

U.S. tech giants aren’t having a great time in Europe. A class-action lawsuit against Facebook filed by Austrian privacy advocate Maximilian Schrems has reached the Austrian Supreme Court. In 2014, Schrems, a part of Europe v. Facebook, filed the suit and encouraged anyone outside of the U.S. and Canada to participate as claimants — and thousands did.

The suit alleges that Facebook aided the NSA with its PRISM surveillance program and states that its policies violate EU data protection laws and invade users’ privacy. Facebook’s data use policy, its lack of effective consent for its data usage, and the fact that it is tracking users through third-party websites via its “Like” button also violates the EU’s data privacy laws, according to Schrems.

“‘Class action’ is not only legal but also the only reasonable way to deal with thousands of identical privacy violations by Facebook.”

The suit targets Facebook Ireland Ltd, Facebook’s international headquarters, which is based in Ireland and serves 80 percent of its users worldwide. Facebook has said the lawsuit is not in the jurisdiction of any country but the United States.

In July, the Court of Appeals said Schrems can file a suit as a “model case,” with just him as the plaintiff because the claims fall under consumer protection laws, but he wants to make sure the case can be heard as a class-action suit — which is exactly what the Austrian Supreme Court will be considering.

“It would not make a lot of sense for the court or the parties before it to file these claims as thousands of individual lawsuits – which we can still do if a ‘class action’ is not allowed,” Schrems said in the announcement. “We therefore think that the ‘class action’ is not only legal but also the only reasonable way to deal with thousands of identical privacy violations by Facebook.”

In a statement, a spokesperson from Facebook said the company is “awaiting the decision.”

According to the announcement, the Austrian Supreme Court could also refer the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECJ, Europe’s highest court. Regardless of its decision, Facebook will still have to answer to the claims in court. The decision is expected in early 2016, and if the admissibility of the lawsuit is decided, then the court will set a date for the first hearing.

Facebook is also involved in a lawsuit in Belgium on how its tracking cookies process data of non-Facebook users. The court ordered the company to stop using the cookie, or pay a daily fine of 250,000 euros — around $268,900 — to the Belgian privacy regulator. Facebook has appealed that decision.

In October, the Court of Justice of the European Union struck down the transatlantic data flows agreement (Safe Harbor), an agreement among 4,000 U.S. companies that transfers data of Europeans to the United States, including Facebook. EU privacy regulators have given the U.S. until January to come up with a way to protect people’s data.

Julian Chokkattu
Former Mobile and Wearables Editor
Julian is the mobile and wearables editor at Digital Trends, covering smartphones, fitness trackers, smartwatches, and more…
Meta One subscription arrives with over 50 premium features across Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Meta AI
Meta’s new subscription bundles premium tools across its social apps and AI services, with plans ranging from $2.99 to $499 per month depending on the features and type of user.
Meta One featured

After months in testing, Meta's umbrella subscription for premium features across all its platforms is now finally live. The company officially announced Meta One today, and it unlocks more than 50 paid features on Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Meta AI.

Pricing for individual subscribers

Read more
Child abuse material continues to surface on X despite Elon Musk’s promises
New investigation claims several previously flagged child abuse images were found on X.
X-logo

Elon Musk once called removing child sexual abuse material from X his top priority. Yet new investigations suggest the platform still struggles to keep known abusive content offline. Reviews by The New York Times and the Canadian Center for Child Protection found previously flagged material on X, while Grok generated sexualized images involving children earlier this year.

Grok generated images involving known abuse victims

Read more
Researchers warn that social media can reveal sensitive details about users
Social media activity can reveal your politics, religion, and shopping habits, researchers warn
Social Media

What you post online is only part of the story. A new review of research into social media privacy warns that platforms and third parties can potentially infer sensitive details about people from seemingly ordinary digital activity, including their political opinions, religious leanings and shopping habits.

The findings, as reported by Techxplore, published in the International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, point to a widening gap between the amount of personal information generated online and the legal and ethical protections designed to safeguard it. The researchers examined privacy breaches, regulatory frameworks, and the responsibilities of both social media companies and their users.

Read more