Skip to main content

Google to revise Google+ nickname policy

Google Plus
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google is quickly working to revise its controversial policy that users of Google+ use their real names on the social network, according to a post by Google+ vice president Bradley Horowitz, who says that changes will arrive in “a matter of weeks.”

“We’ve noticed that many violations of the Google+ common name policy were in fact well-intentioned and inadvertent and for these users our process can be frustrating and disappointing,” wrote Horowitz on Google+. “So we’re currently making a number of improvements to this process – specifically regarding how we notify these users that they’re not in compliance with Google+ policies and how we communicate the remedies available to them.”

Recommended Videos

As Horowitz notes, these changes to Google+ policy include: warning users before their accounts are suspended, and giving them “a chance to correct their name in advance of any suspension;” revising the sign-up process to “reduce the likelihood” that users violate the policy in the first place; adding an “Other names” section to Google+ profiles, so users can list the alternate names they go by; enabling “employment,” “occupation” and “education” fields to appear when members with permission to view these details mouse-over users’ names, which “also helps other users find and identify you.”

Horowitz’s statement comes after Google sparked an uproar this weekend for deleting the accounts of Google+ members without warning or explanation. Turns out, the reason was that these users had used names other than their real names (including nicknames, maiden names, pseudonyms, etc) as their usernames on Google+, a violation of the social network’s policy.

Google vice president Vic Gundotra, who heads up the company social initiatives, explained on Google+ that the reason for the real-name requirement is to establish a positive tone for the network, “”like when a restaurant doesn’t allow people who aren’t wearing shirts to enter.” He added that rule isn’t about real names, per se, but is instead “about having common names and removing people who spell their names in weird ways, like using upside-down characters, or who are using obviously fake names, like ‘god’ or worse.”

It’s important to remember that Google+ is still in invite-only testing mode, so missteps and changes are to be expected — in fact, that’s the entire point of a test mode. As Horowitz notes, the “dialog” between users and those at Google tasked with improving Google+ “will continue for a long time.” So don’t be surprised when similar gaffes pop up again and again.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Topics
Bluesky finally adds a feature many had been waiting for
A blue sky with clouds.

Bluesky has been making a lot of progress in recent months by simplifying the process to sign up while at the same time rolling out a steady stream of new features.

As part of those continuing efforts, the social media app has just announced that users can now send direct messages (DMs).

Read more
Reddit just achieved something for the first time in its 20-year history
The Reddit logo.

Reddit’s on a roll. The social media platform has just turned a profit for the first time in its 20-year history, and now boasts a record 97.2 million daily active users, marking a year-over-year increase of 47%. A few times during the quarter, the figure topped 100 million, which Reddit CEO and co-founder Steve Huffman said in a letter to shareholders had been a “long-standing milestone” for the site.

The company, which went public in March, announced the news in its third-quarter earnings results on Tuesday.

Read more
Worried about the TikTok ban? This is how it might look on your phone
TikTok splash screen on an Android phone.

The US Supreme Court has decided to uphold a law that would see TikTok banned in the country on January 19. Now, the platform has issued an official statement, confirming that it will indeed shut down unless it gets some emergency relief from the outgoing president.

“Unless the Biden Administration immediately provides a definitive statement to satisfy the most critical service providers assuring non-enforcement, unfortunately TikTok will be forced to go dark on January 19,” said the company soon after the court’s verdict.
So, what does going dark mean?
So, far, there is no official statement on what exactly TikTok means by “going dark.” There is a lot of speculation out there on how exactly the app or website will look once TikTok shutters in the US.

Read more