Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Google to revise Google+ nickname policy

Add as a preferred source on Google
Google Plus
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google is quickly working to revise its controversial policy that users of Google+ use their real names on the social network, according to a post by Google+ vice president Bradley Horowitz, who says that changes will arrive in “a matter of weeks.”

“We’ve noticed that many violations of the Google+ common name policy were in fact well-intentioned and inadvertent and for these users our process can be frustrating and disappointing,” wrote Horowitz on Google+. “So we’re currently making a number of improvements to this process – specifically regarding how we notify these users that they’re not in compliance with Google+ policies and how we communicate the remedies available to them.”

Recommended Videos

As Horowitz notes, these changes to Google+ policy include: warning users before their accounts are suspended, and giving them “a chance to correct their name in advance of any suspension;” revising the sign-up process to “reduce the likelihood” that users violate the policy in the first place; adding an “Other names” section to Google+ profiles, so users can list the alternate names they go by; enabling “employment,” “occupation” and “education” fields to appear when members with permission to view these details mouse-over users’ names, which “also helps other users find and identify you.”

Horowitz’s statement comes after Google sparked an uproar this weekend for deleting the accounts of Google+ members without warning or explanation. Turns out, the reason was that these users had used names other than their real names (including nicknames, maiden names, pseudonyms, etc) as their usernames on Google+, a violation of the social network’s policy.

Google vice president Vic Gundotra, who heads up the company social initiatives, explained on Google+ that the reason for the real-name requirement is to establish a positive tone for the network, “”like when a restaurant doesn’t allow people who aren’t wearing shirts to enter.” He added that rule isn’t about real names, per se, but is instead “about having common names and removing people who spell their names in weird ways, like using upside-down characters, or who are using obviously fake names, like ‘god’ or worse.”

It’s important to remember that Google+ is still in invite-only testing mode, so missteps and changes are to be expected — in fact, that’s the entire point of a test mode. As Horowitz notes, the “dialog” between users and those at Google tasked with improving Google+ “will continue for a long time.” So don’t be surprised when similar gaffes pop up again and again.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Topics
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more