Skip to main content

WTF, Internet? Stop telling me teens know what’s best for the Web


Alright, everybody, listen up – it’s experiment time. Close your eyes and think back to when you were between the ages of 14 and 17. It was a magical time, right? If you were anything like me, you were like-so-pumped that your parents bought you a Nokia brick and you made lists of songs you liked so other people would download and burn CDs for you because your dial-up was too slow and your dad said you’d get arrested if you used Kazaa anymore.

Damn. It was a simpler time.

While I find myself to be an above-average human (I have no shame in self-promotion; I’m great), I think I can look back on a few of my formative years and say with great honesty and confidence …

That I was horrible.

me 14
Does it look like this chick knows what’s cool? No. She most certainly does not. Unless it’s zip-up, waterproof vests.

Really, I was truly just the worst – I mean, better than most 16-year-olds because … well, please, let’s be real. And it wasn’t in a stole-my-parents’-car or huffed-paint-behind-the-school or even went-through-a-goth-phase way, but just trust, I am infinitely more interesting and cool at 26 than I was at 16. And that’s the way it should be.

I bring this up because we seem to have an obsession with letting teenagers be our Web trend forecasters. How many stories have you seen this year that spell the end of Facebook because teenagers are like, so over it? Or that Snapchat is going to be the next big social network because they are so into it? Way too many.

So back to our experiment – how much fun is science?! Close those eyes and think of five things you thought were so goddamn cool you could die when you were a teenager. Don’t be embarrassed, I’m playing along. Here we go:

  1. Guys who occasionally wore puka shell necklaces.
  2. Wearing hats. Wearing hats way too often.
  3. Letting my friends write song lyrics – in Sharpie – on the ceiling of my bedroom. Hi! Hi mom and dad! Sorry about that. You’ll never sell that damn house, will you? Sorry again!
  4. The Mitsubishi Eclipse. My intense interest in this car still escapes me.
  5. Watching Donnie Darko and then talking about it. A lot.
puka shell necklace
You, sir, are wearing the hell out of that puka shell necklace.

Ooof that was painful. Do we all feel a little better though? So let’s dissect this: While some of you might still like or do these things (who can resist a good puka shell necklace – am I right or am I right? There’s a reason Pacific Sunwear is still in business!) and they vary on a scale of horrifying to “meh,” it just proves that maybe the things we attached ourselves to in middle and high school weren’t going to be permanently awesome.

It really felt like it back then though, right? Like you’d always want to go to Taking Back Sunday concerts and have absurdly dramatic political conversations with your friends? Maybe you want to argue that things of the digital variety are different. To that, I have only the following to say:


Look, this doesn’t mean that peeking into what the kids are doing is without value. It’s intensely interesting! I am constantly flipping through my little sister’s iPhone to see what apps she’s using and asking her what all the young hipsters think is cool these days. That’s fine, it’s fun! But it’s not a damn census report. So let’s all just back up a little on the alarmism, folks.

No more “Teens don’t like Facebook! The end is nigh!” articles.

No more “Teens talk trash about Gmail on Twitter SO IT’S TOTALLY OVER!” posts.

No more “Teens say Snapchat is the new Instagram!” reports.

Let’s just all take a moment to remember what flighty, dumb little shits we were in high school. Now think if someone gave you incredibly fast Wi-Fi, an iPhone, and a heightened sense of authority. We’re looking at a Gremlins-type situation here.

And with that, I shall take my leave as the Tumblrsphere starts talking about what an ancient bitch I am. 

Editors' Recommendations

WTF, Internet? Overexposed celebs don’t get to pick which parts of their life go viral
wtf internet last thing twitter needs pictures peed pregnancy tests kimye

Sometime within the last two weeks, you probably saw a glorious video making the Internet rounds.

That's right, the duo we've come to collectively know as Kimye (or Kim Kardashian and Kanye West if you're over the age of 21/don't watch a lot of reality television/have a healthy amount of self respect) has finally gotten engaged!

Read more
WTF, Internet? Keep your hashtags out of my real-life conversation
what is a hashtag wtf interne jcpenny

There’s a lot of overlap between our social lives and social media. It’s only natural: When you spend much time sitting at a computer or staring at a smartphone, there’s bound to be plenty of experiences that sort of blend between the real world and the virtual one.
And that’s okay – usually. I’ll tell you what’s not okay: Saying “hashtag” out loud.
This horrible phenomenon took root within the last couple of years, and it only seems to be getting worse. Case in point: JC Penney.
I’ve got no beef with JCP. It’s a perfectly respectable store that I have some fond childhood memories of as one of the few “regular” shops we went to for back-to-school shopping that carried uniform-friendly clothes. It’s not particularly flashy or hip, but that’s fine. They make clothes, they sell clothes.
There’s something to be said for that, because the last thing this world needs is another brand screaming “Look! We’re trendy! We’re with it!” at the top of their lungs, competing with weird, irrelevant Twitter campaigns or creeptastic Facebook ads.
But alas, JCPenney has succumbed. The store recently gave customers $10 to $25 off their purchases if they say the word “hashtag” at check out.  It was announced via this abomination.

#Tomorrow #is #HashtagDay #at #jcp #Say #HashtagOffer #AtCheckout #ForA #10off25 #Offer #DetailsAndExclusionsInStore #ThatsHowWeDo
— JCPenney (@jcpenney) October 1, 2013

Read more
WTF, Internet? We don’t need B.S. surveys to typecast women as Facebook-obsessed divas
wtf internet we dont need b s surveys to typecast women as facebook obsessed divas wft

The last time I tried to write an article that made a fairly agreed-upon, tongue-in-cheek assessment about some of the problems with how we portray and regard “women in tech,” this happened. So trust me when I say this is not something I enjoy talking about. It’s like all the Internet’s jerks are hibernating in their Gollum caves, and then an alarm sounds that some woman, somewhere, has published the words “women in tech,” and they come barreling out of their hovels, heading for the comment section without a backward glance.
But apparently I’m going to do it anyway, so let’s just get it all out there right now: Yep, I’ve got lady parts, you may or may not, and you hate me and everything I’m about to say. Also, I definitely just want to get married and have babies and buy shoes. You nailed it! You got me!
Why did no one talk to any dudes? Do men not need closet space?!
Moving on: Apparently a recent survey done by U.K. furniture retailer Sharps Bedroom found that because of Facebook and Instagram photos, women feel the need to constantly update their wardrobes. Even soon after buying new clothes, we feel they are old, because of sites like Facebook and Instagram.
This Daily Mail article about this is the only source of information because Sharps Bedroom (a totally legit survey source, for sure) simply has a blog post about how the findings of this survey mean you need more storage space. The link to the “recent survey” just loops you back to the Daily Mail article. Which really nails it with the intro:
“As many men are well aware, women need little encouragement to shop for new clothes.”
Come on, nameless Daily Mail Reporter, pull us into the bigotry. Don’t lead with it!
It goes on to explain that “thanks to the masses of photographs posted on sites such as Facebook and Instagram, many women deem their clothes old soon after buying them.”
Now for the question portion of our evening.
Question 1: This “on sites such as Facebook and Instagram” is a little confusing – do you just mean posted on any social media site? Or the Internet? Just that seeing clothes online at all in almost any capacity makes women go all googly-eyed and start hitting up Amazon like there’s no tomorrow? Once again, I would seriously love to see the actual survey and find out what in God’s name you’re getting at here. Does this have to do with the influx of clothing-related photos being posted to social sites, the general increase in this content on the Internet as a whole, or perhaps the very visual social campaigns that brands are running? Would love some answers.
Question 2: What exactly is it about social networks that make us go buy new clothes? Is it that we’re inspired by seeing other users’ styles or that once we show up online in an outfit, we don’t want to repeat it?
Question 3: Um, did you guys even ask any men to participate in this survey?
Because I did! And guess what – their answers sound a lot like the answers of the women I asked. Basically both sexes admitted that yes, photos of them on Facebook and Instagram make them more conscious of what they wear; i.e., if you wore outfit one to a party last weekend where a lot of photos were taken and shared, you probably won’t wear the same thing. However, most people (people) agreed that “the masses of photographs posted on sites such as Facebook and Instagram” weren’t the largest motivators to shop.
… But even if they were, why did no one talk to any dudes? Do men not need closet space?! To suggest men don’t need closet space is just downright offensive. That is the biggest tragedy here.
I guess no one thought about the fact that men are actually more engaged social shoppers as well as motivational and impulsive shoppers. Maybe because of these things, they're also highly influenced or motivated by “the masses of photographs posed on sites such as Facebook and Instagram” (I’m sorry I keep repeating this phrase, it’s just too wonderfully vague, meaningless, and undefined to let go of) to go buy clothes. 
This has been my long-winded way of calling these two publishers out – and B.S. surveys everywhere.
Sure, generally speaking, women buy more clothes, and according to pop culture, we like to go to malls and carry as many bags as can possibly fit on our arms. But to try and make this “SEEING PRETTY PICTURES ON THE INTERNET MAKES LADIES EMPTY THEIR PURSES” statement (and backing it up with said possibly non-existent survey) is pretty irresponsible. It’s just adding fuel to an already unstoppable fire of misogyny.
With that, I will leave you to it, commenters. I know you've got a lot of work to do.

Read more