Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. News

YouTube is making it harder for small-time creators to make money

Add as a preferred source on Google

Small-time YouTube creators are going to find it harder to make money on the site from next month when the Google-owned company implements new rules to help it focus its resources in a bid to please advertisers.

YouTube came under fire from brands on multiple occasions last year when their ads showed up alongside extreme video content widely considered as unfit for the popular streaming site.

Recommended Videos

Keen not to scare off big-name companies paying considerable sums of money to advertise on the site, YouTube said it’s implementing a new threshold for its Partner Program that will “significantly improve our ability to identify creators who contribute positively to the community,” thereby reducing the chances of offensive content running with ads.

The new rules mean that only channels with more than 1,000 subscribers or 4,000 watch hours in the last 12 months will be able to make cash through the Partner Program.

Up to now, creators only needed a total of 10,000 views on their videos to join YouTube’s revenue-sharing program, but the company claims that that threshold failed to surface spammers, impersonators, and other “bad actors.”

The new threshold will also affect existing channels from February 20, 2018, so any creators with a channel that is currently making money from ads but has fewer than 1,000 subscribers or 4,000 watch hours in the last 12 months will lose their revenue stream until their stats meet the requirements.

In a blog post, YouTube admitted the changes will affect “a significant number of channels,” but added that “99 percent of those affected were making less than $100 per year in the last year, with 90 percent earning less than $2.50 in the last month.”

Star vloggers also affected

The issue of offensive creator content continues to bug the company, with one of YouTube’s most popular vloggers, Logan Paul, causing controversy at the end of 2017 with a video that appeared to show a suicide victim in Japan.

Partly in response to Logan’s blunder, YouTube YouTube said on Tuesday, January 16, it would start using human reviewers to assess the suitability of popular channels for Google Preferred, the elite ads program available to YouTube’s top creators. Videos on such channels will also be scrutinized more closely to ensure the safety of the content.

The refreshed approach should enable YouTube to focus more resources on fewer videos, reducing the chances of getting in a tangle with brands angry about their ads showing up alongside unsuitable content. The company acknowledged that “size alone” is not enough to adequately determine if a channel is suitable for monetization, promising it will carry on using signals such as community strikes, spam, and other abuse flags to highlight unsuitable content.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more