Skip to main content

Just how equal-opportunity is AirBnB for its hosts?

airbnb lux
It seems like an unlikely venue for discrimination — when hosts are setting their own prices, as they do on AirBnB, how could entire races and ethnicities be charging (and therefore earning) less than others? In a strange manifestation of perhaps internalized social biases, a number of recent studies have shown that non-white AirBnB hosts actually maintain lower prices for their rental properties than their white counterparts. In fact, a 2012 Harvard Business School study showed that non-black hosts charged 12 percent more than black ones, and in a recent study regarding Asian-American hosts, this discrepancy is even more pronounced.

A new study entitled “The Model Minority? Not on A Hedonic Pricing Model to Quantify Racial Bias against Asian Americans,” published in the Harvard-affiliated Journal of Technology reveals that Asian-American hosts in Berkeley and Oakland (two cities where Asians comprise a significant portion of the population) actually earn around 20 percent less per week than Caucasian hosts. This generally translates to around $90.

Related Videos

The results were based upon an analysis of 101 AirBnB hosts in the Bay Area of California, and researchers noted that they chose these two locations in particular for their “socioeconomic and racial diversity.” As per a National Public Radio report on the research, available properties were “adjusted to account for rental type and occupancy,” and hosts were categorized “as Asian or white based on profile pictures. (Pictures that didn’t clearly indicate whether the host was Asian or not were eliminated).”

The results, researchers note, were stark — “Asian hosts earn, on average, $90 (or 20 percent) less per week than white landlords within this location for the standard one-bedroom rental for occupancy of one. The differential increases with the number of bedrooms and other upgrades to the house go up. Our regressions are resilient when subjected to statistical tests,” their results read.

The impetus for this study, explain co-authors David Wang, Stephen Xi, and John Gilheany in their paper, is to examine the effects of the meek and submissive stereotype that has come to extend to Asian-Americans, in spite of their simultaneous reputation as the so-called model minority. “While Asian Americans excel statistically on paper, do they face covert racial bias online?” researchers asked.

And according to these results, the answer seems pretty clear.

The explanation for Asian-Americans’ tendency to charge less may be ingrained in their pricing strategy, or it may be a recognition of market expectations. Ellen Wu, who serves as an associate professor of Asian American studies and history at Indiana University, told NPR that “Consumers come to expect paying Asian people less. We’ve come to expect cheaply priced products manufactured in places in China.” This may lead to an internalization of “subconscious bias,” both by Asian-Americans themselves and by others, who seem to observe their Asian peers perpetuating an existing stereotype, only furthering the vicious cycle.

It is, perhaps, the self-fulfilling nature of this phenomenon that makes it so difficult to address, but regardless, it’s a trend worth noting. Because as it turns out, the Internet is not an entirely ethnicity-blind place.

Editors' Recommendations

Airbnb softens its tone, agreeing to regulations in Amsterdam and London
airbnb urban planning samara

Airbnb is trading an ornery history for an olive branch. The home rental company, which has long been known for fighting government regulations, is now changing its tone -- at least in Europe. On Thursday, Airbnb made a novel move, agreeing to limit the number of nights hosts can rent out homes in London and Amsterdam, two of the company's biggest markets. This could set a precedent for Airbnb's operations the world over, notably in other major cities like New York and San Francisco, which have long accused Airbnb of driving up rental prices and having otherwise adverse effects on the housing market.

But now, Airbnb looks to be playing by the rules (regardless of whether or not they agree with them). Beginning in January, the company will disallow hosts in London and Amsterdam from offering their entire homes for more than the legally permissible number of days. In London, that limit is 90 days, whereas in Amsterdam, it stands at 60. “This is a way of saying, you can trust people to paint within the lines, because we’re going to help with that,” said Patrick Robinson, Airbnb’s head of public policy in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

Read more
In New York, it's now a crime to advertise short-term apartment listings on Airbnb
airbnb nyc lawsuit settled

Hoping to find a cheap pad to crash while drifting through the Big Apple? You probably won't be doing it through Airbnb. On Friday, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation that levies steep fines on property owners who advertise short-term availability of their apartments and homes.

The legislation, which the New York state legislature passed in June, effectively strengthens New York's existing laws on short-term property listings, which, as of 2010, prohibit apartments -- defined as buildings with "three or more units" -- from being rented out for less than 30 days. Owners found promoting listings which meet that criteria that category face stiff penalties: $1,000 for the first violation, $5,000 for the second violation, and $7,5000 for the third and every violation thereafter.

Read more
Airbnb could lose much of its New York business if State Senate bill passes
airbnb releases list of most wish listed properties treehouse 3

Airbnb is at risk of losing its biggest market after the New York State Senate passed a bill that would outlaw the service from advertising unoccupied apartments for short-term rentals.

While Gov. Andrew Cuomo still has to sign the bill before it becomes law, Airbnb and others in the tech industry have been vocal against the Senate vote on social media. The New York City Council had previously argued that the service is guilty of driving up rents, and the New York Senate vote marks the first tangible legal action against Airbnb in the state.

Read more