Skip to main content

Inferior human crashes Google’s self-driving car into a Prius

google-self-driving-car
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Due to a Jalopnik reader’s quick reflexes with a mobile phone camera earlier this week, one of Google’s self-driving Prius automobiles got caught rear-ending another Prius. This caused a chain-reaction that resulted in two Honda Accords and a second Toyota Prius to be rear ended. However, Google claims that the manual driving mode was enabled and a human driver is to blame for the accident. Legally, the cars must have a human behind the wheel at all times to take control of the vehicle in case of failure by the self-driving mechanism. According to Google, the cars have logged over 160,000 miles without incident when driving in the automatic mode. 

google_car-crashThe launch of Google’s self-driving cars came late last year. Google equipped an Audi TT and six Toyota Prius cars with a large rotating sensor mounted to the top of the vehicle. The sensor builds a constantly changing three-dimensional map of the surroundings and relies on a video camera to watch for roving pedestrians, bicycles zipping by and the different colors in a stop light. At launch, Google stressed the superiority of the navigation data compared to the narrow view of a human driver as well as the tendency of a human driver to become distracted behind the wheel.  

There’s no law in California banning the use of self-driving vehicles and Google has used the Golden state for the majority of testing. The cars have mostly been tested on the Google campus in Mountain View, but have been driven across landmarks like the Golden Gate Bridge as well. Google also got support from Nevada in June of this year. Nevada became the first state to pass a law legalizing the use of self-driving cars. The new law allows the Department of Transportation to stipulate insurance requirements, safety regulations and designate testing areas around the state.

Editors' Recommendations

Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
Uber gives up on developing its own self-driving car
Uber self-driving car

Uber has announced it's selling its self-driving car unit, although it isn’t entirely cutting its interest in autonomous vehicles.

The company will sell its autonomous-vehicle unit -- Advanced Technologies Group (ATG) -- to Aurora, a Silicon Valley-based company founded in 2017 by former contributors to self-driving-car projects operated by Google (now Waymo) and Uber.

Read more
This self-driving racing car could have done with a driver
watch this self driving racing car slam straight into a wall roborace accident

No one ever said building an autonomous car would be easy.

While a number of companies have certainly made incredible progress with the technology over the last decade or so, some are clearly faring better than others.

Read more
New self-driving car algorithm keeps you safe by constantly predicting doom
waymo self driving car testing

Call it fatalistic, pessimistic, or just really, really, smart, but a new self-driving car algorithm developed by researchers at Germany’s Technical University of Munich (TUM) thrives on thinking about the worst thing that could happen at every moment. And then figuring out how to get out of it without endangering or obstructing traffic.

“Current autonomous driving systems usually incorporate most-likely evolutions of a traffic scenario, [such as] the preceding vehicle will most likely accelerate,” Christian Pek, a researcher in the university's researcher in the Cyber-Physical Systems Group, told Digital Trends. “However, this design might result in unsafe behaviors if traffic participants behave differently than expected -- for example, [if instead] the preceding vehicle decelerates. Our algorithm addresses this problem by computing all possible future evolutions of the scenario by considering all possible motions of other traffic participants that are compliant with traffic rules. As a result, we are able to ensure that decisions are safe regardless of the future legal motion of other traffic participants.”

Read more