Skip to main content

Apple and Google independently developing wearable, reality augmenting smartphones

phone-over-sexSome of us are quite attached to our mobile devices, much to the chagrin of anything and anyone that isn’t a smartphone screen. Apple and Google are reportedly looking to change that. They want to integrate our smartphones into daily life better by developing wearable mobile devices that act more like a window to the real world, rather than a screen.

According to the New York Times Bits blog, Apple has been secretly working on a wearable computer, much like the wrist worn iPod Nano, which will integrate Siri. The NYT sources say that a small number of Apple employees have been rounded up for “conceptualizing and even prototyping some wearable devices.” One device the company is toying with was described as a wrist worn “curved-glass iPod.”

On the Google end, the search giant has been tasking researchers at the secret Google X labs to develop devices that relay information to your Android powered smartphone. Google has reportedly been hiring a slew of engineers who specialize in wearable computers from engineering universities or places like Nokia Labs and Apple.

According to a 9to5Google, this project the search company is working on is a pair of augmented reality glasses, which  will plug users into realtime search results based on what they are currently viewing. The device would be unobtrusive, and would look like a pair of normal thick-rimmed glasses with a few buttons on the side. 9To5Google says that that the device “communicates directly with the Cloud over IP,” though it speculates that Google glasses would connect via GPS or Android’s Internet using WiFi or Bluetooth.

Google may be telegraphing this new wearable product with a recent blog announcement about a Google Goggles upgrade earlier this month. Google Goggles 1.7 acts as a better decoder ring since it doesn’t require a photo to be shot, but returns results on multiple items in realtime; much like the rumors of the Terminator-vision glasses. There are no clues yet as to when and if the new augmented reality glasses will be released.

Editors' Recommendations

Jeff Hughes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a SF Bay Area-based writer/ninja that loves anything geek, tech, comic, social media or gaming-related.
The 4 best Whoop alternatives in 2024
Someone wearing a Whoop 4.0 and an Apple Watch Ultra 2.

If you’ve been looking for a top-shelf fitness tracker, one of the best brands in the business is Whoop. Having developed quite the reputation over the years, professional athletes and everyday gym-goers are glad to stand behind Whoop’s advanced tracking capabilities, and so are we! But Whoop equipment doesn’t come cheap. That’s why it’s always good to have alternatives when you’re shopping for a new consumer tech device.

To that end, your pals at Digital Trends have got you covered. As experts on health and fitness gear, we’ve gone ahead and rounded up the four best Whoop alternatives to track your workouts in 2024.

Read more
The 6 best Apple Watch alternatives in 2024
Person adjusting Garmin Forerunner 965 on their wrist.

Smartwatches are powerful companions for our smartphones, offering quick access to messages and fitness tracking stats. The Apple Watch lineup is filled with many of the most popular smartwatches of 2024, as they're easy to use, loaded with features, and highly customizable. But if you own an Android phone – or simply don't like the Apple Watch design – you'll be glad to know there are several Apple Watch alternatives for you to choose from.

Ready to find a companion for your wrist? Here are the six best Apple Watch alternatives of 2024. This includes premium fitness trackers like the Garmin Forerunner 965 and the stylish Withings ScanWatch 2. For more great options, check out our roundup of the best smartwatches.

Read more
There’s something Apple isn’t telling you about the new iPad Pro
A render of the front and back of the 2024 iPad Pro.

Earlier this year, I bought a new MacBook Air. It was the entry-level 13-inch trim with an eight-core graphics engine. If my budget allowed, I would’ve loved to go with the higher-end M3 version with a 10-core GPU inside.

Spending a few hundred dollars for the higher RAM and storage configuration automatically gets you the more powerful M3 variant. Conversely, you can’t just pay more for an M3 version with a beefier GPU. If you want the best performance possible, you have to pay for the higher storage/RAM models. It’s an infuriating and darn expensive situation, but that’s how Apple rolls.

Read more