The Electronic Frontier Foundation scored a big victory last year when it successfully petitioned the U.S. Copyright Office to protect smartphone jailbreakers and video remixers with exemptions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Now the EFF is looking to expand the scope of those exemptions with some new requests that protect (or further protect) the “jailbreaking” of smartphones, tablets and gaming consoles, allowing them to run software that isn’t necessarily supported by the device’s manufacturer. The organization is also seeking greater protections for those who “use excerpts from DVDs or downloading services to create new, remixed works.”
“The DMCA is supposed to block copyright infringement. But instead it can be misused to threaten creators, innovators, and consumers, discouraging them from making full and fair use of their own property,” EFF Intellectual Property Director Corynne McSherry said.
“Hobbyists and tinkerers who want to modify their phones or video game consoles to run software programs of their choice deserve protection under the law. So do artists and critics who use short excerpts of video content to create new works of commentary and criticism. Copyright law shouldn’t be stifling such uses – it should be encouraging them.”
The problem, as you probably already know, is that modded consoles — the term “jailbreak” really just applies to iOS devices — are often used for the purpose of piracy. The exemption would not (and, rightfully, can’t) protect content theft, so it’ll still be illegal (and very, very immoral) to use downloaded or otherwise stolen software.
The DMCA has often been used to “chill competition, free speech and fair use,” the EFF claims, and so these exemptions “are meant to mitigate the harms the law has caused to legitimate, non-infringing uses of copyrighted materials.” The request will be put through a battery of hearings next spring, with a ruling from the U.S. Copyright Office expected to come in October 2012.
This will be a huge win for the people, and a huge blow for the fascists corporations. The people have spoken, and we demand our rights! What they need to remember is, the consumer holds the power, not corporations.
Nope, those fascist corporations are the ones that produce the supplies. It’s called the law of supply and demand. If we demand, they can stop making that item. This will discourage many people to make quality items if they cannot get the full bang for their buck. This sucks.
Yeah, and if they stop making the item they lose a revenue stream, which is worse than making a point just to make a point because the people demanded something that the corporation didn’t want to do… You didn’t follow through with you’re law. The people hold the power with our money. So what if they stop making the product. Who really loses? We still have our money securely in our pockets. Will it hurt this generation? possibly, but I don’t see that happening. I believe it will help actually. It will most definitely make developers consider the openness of their systems in the future.
Buying something and then having someone tell you, that you aren’t legally allowed to do what you want with your property is foolish.
Rarely do people want to use unsupported software on their consoles, rather it will give rise to the cracked games on console. Console jailbreaking and smartphone jailbreak is way different.
I disagree. I hacked my PS3 because Sony was taking away my functionality. I purchased the system under the pretense that I can do certain things with it. Instead, after two years of owning it, they started to systematically taking away those functionalists. And what’s worse, if you didn’t upgrade your system, you couldn’t play new games! They forced you to comply with the removal of said functions. Not to mention, Making backups of the software you own (which is what I do) is perfectly legal. I would rather avoid burning out my blueray laser again… And I would like to avoid having scratched discs. Rooting your console and rooting your phone are exactly the same thing.
Also, it’s quite rare that a company will remove features that was with the product when it was sold…