Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. Legacy Archives

Opinion: Why you still need a digital camera

Add as a preferred source on Google

giant lensPut down your iPhone 4S and listen up: Cameras—actual cameras—still exist and are worth using. More and more people claim they are foregoing owning a digital camera because their smartphone can “basically” get the job done.

Let it be said that if you don’t intend to cherish your photos, then maybe you are too far gone and a digital camera really isn’t necessary. But that seems to be increasingly untrue. And just know that many of you are forcing horrible, washed out, noisy, and terribly lit photos of what could otherwise be stunning images upon us. 

Recommended Videos

Megapixels matter

Not just megapixels, but every hardware and firmware specification you could imagine. Larger and interchangeable lenses, optical zoom, wide-angle capability, larger and more powerful sensors… this list goes on and on and on. Most cameras are able to best every single spec a smartphone camera boasts, and can offer options like controlling flash depth and strength, as well as higher res images. Forget about printing images any larger than a 4×6 (in most cases–the iPhone 4 can print up to 8x10s, but that’s as good as you’ll get). 

“Consumers may be tempted to shoot just about everything with their smartphone cameras, given their capabilities and convenience,” Consumer Reports associate electronics editor Terry Sullivan says. “However, our tests showed that even the models that produced very good images can’t substitute for the image quality and shooting versatility of a dedicated, standalone device.”

canon_powershot_a800The iPhone 4S is regarded to be one of if not the best camera phone on the market. It’s an 8-megapixel device with an f/2.4 aperture, LED flash, and face detection. The cheapest compact digital camera from Canon, the PowerShot A800, offers 10-megapixels, 3×3 optical zoom (iPhone has none), face detection, is capable at up to ISO 1600, multiple flash settings, and blur reduction. Not to mention a battery solely dedicated to digital imaging, so you won’t find yourself with a dead device you’ve overcommitted to handling every detail of your electronic life. 

And details like low light performance and shutter speed are more important to consumers than you might think, according to the NPD. While ease is an important factor, so to is the end result. 

Cameras are convenient

When was the last time you couldn’t find a camera that would fit in your pocket? Manufacturers are well-aware that the lure of the smartphone is its convenience, and have produced more than enough microscopic, high-quality point-and-shoots that are both tiny and pack a punch. The Canon PowerShot ELPH and Sony Cyber-shot lineup are just two such options.

The pocket argument doesn’t really hold up for a large percentage of the population. How many women carry their phones in their back pocket? And since when was there not enough room in your purse for a pint-sized point-and-shoot? Add to the fact that women tend to be more snap-happy, and the argument that a smartphone is all you need falls further apart.

sizeAnd if you truly need overlapping features to convince you to carry a camera, plenty of new digital cameras have integrated instant sharing and GPS features.

People value their pictures

The renewed interest in images sort of follows the “chicken or the egg” paradox: Did social networks make us care about photos more or did photo applications make us care about social networks more? Either way, the photo-sharing platform has undeniably taken off.

Hit apps like Instagram, Piictu, and Hipstamatic have made faux-photographers out of the unlikeliest consumers. And while you could interpret that as being entirely dependent on the mobile camera, you could also argue the end result is that photo inspiration has taken to the masses.

What it really comes down to is that people would be jumping on board with photo-sharing so hard if they didn’t care about those images—and I have to hope this means the digital camera isn’t an endangered species because of the smartphone. Instead, fingers crossed, it will have the device to thank for a whole new generation of users.  

If anything, maybe this just means there is going to be a division in types of photos: Photos you take with your phone (on the fly, to reference later) and those you take with your camera (photos you want to keep forever, from important events or travels). In fact, the NPD group says that while point-and-shoots sales have faltered, DSLR sales have increased. So before you ditch your digital camera and devote yourself entirely to your smartphone, think about how terrible those important photos are going to look when you want to blow them up to an 11×13 and frame them.  

compare
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Fujifilm Instax Mini 13 review: This instant camera won me over with its no-frills retro charm
From printing instant memories to rediscovering the fading charm of polaroids, Fujifilm's camera offers a budget route to a simple indulgence.
Fujifilm Instax mini 13 camera.

See at Amazon

Quick review

Read more
Want to try film photography? Kodak’s new $35 camera is a great place to start
This retro inspired Kodak EC35 camera keeps film photography refreshingly simple.
Kodak-EC35

If you've been curious about film photography but didn't want to spend a fortune, Kodak has a new camera worth checking out. The new Kodak EC35 is a reusable 35mm point-and-shoot camera that costs just $34.99, making it one of the most affordable ways to try shooting on film.

Developed by Reto Project under the Kodak brand, the EC35 keeps things simple with a lightweight design, automatic flash, and a pocket-friendly body. It also arrives as interest in analog photography continues to grow, offering beginners an inexpensive alternative to disposable film cameras.

Read more
The FCC’s latest crackdown could put more than DJI drones at risk in the US
Robot, Person, Face

DJI may have found creative ways to keep some of its products flowing into the US, but those efforts are now drawing increased attention from regulators. According to The Verge, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has started cracking down on several companies it believes could be helping DJI continue selling products in the country. These businesses have been described by industry observers as "DJI front companies" because they market or import products that appear to be closely tied to the Chinese drone maker while operating under different brand names.

DJI's alleged back door may be closing

Read more