Skip to main content

Samsung countersues Dyson for $9.4m, claims reputation damage

samsung countersues dyson for 9 4m motion sync vacuum cleaner
Samsung's Motion Sync vacuum cleaner, the machine at the center of Dyson's claim last year. Image used with permission by copyright holder

Last August Dyson filed a lawsuit against Samsung, accusing it of stealing elements of its vacuum cleaner design, though two months later it dropped the claim.

If Dyson thought that was the end of it, it was wrong, as it has emerged that the Korean tech giant is now suing it for 10 billion won ($9.38 million), accusing the UK tech firm of “seriously hurting its corporate image by portraying it as a repeat patent violator or copycat,” the Korea Times reported in the last few days.

Dyson’s original claim centered on the steering mechanism of Samsung’s ‘Motion Sync’ vacuum cleaner unveiled at a Berlin tech show last year. Sir James Dyson described Samsung’s design as “a cynical rip-off” of the steering mechanism on its own DC37 and DC39 vacuum models, which hit the market two years earlier.

‘Intolerable’

In its defense, Samsung produced ‘prior art’ which claimed to show that the idea was already in use prior to Dyson obtaining the patent for it in 2009. Dyson dropped its lawsuit voluntarily in November.

Speaking to the Korea Times, a spokesman for Samsung said, “We are initially seeking 10 billion won compensation from the UK-based manufacturer. However, the amount will increase depending on how the court proceedings go.”

He added, “Samsung’s marketing activities were negatively affected by Dyson’s groundless litigation, which is intolerable.”

Following news of Samsung’s action, Dyson issued a statement, saying it “pioneered cyclonic vacuum cleaners and digital motors – and has been developing them ever since. We patent our technology, and naturally defend it.”

The UK firm added that it was “surprised a company over 100 times bigger than Dyson is so worried. The patent system offers us some protection but not enough: with an army of lawyers, hidden prior art is occasionally found and ways to design around existing patents identified.”

History

The current dispute isn’t the first time the pair have clashed over patents – five years ago a UK court ordered Samsung to pay Dyson £590,000 (then $852,000) for attempting to patent the latter’s triple-cyclone vacuum cleaner technology.

“Samsung aped our patented technology and cynically claimed to have invented it. Today’s result is a win for engineers and inventors,” Dyson said following the ruling.

The Seoul-based company has been involved in a number of high profile court battles in recent years, most notably with arch rival Apple over various patent infringement claims. The pair’s next round of legal action is due to kick off next month. 

Samsung’s action against Dyson could be viewed as part of an ongoing effort by the company to break free from its reputation in some quarters as an imitator rather than a leader in tech design, with executives apparently eager to exploit Dyson’s decision to drop the case last year. 

[via Korea Times / Guardian]

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
How to reset the Nanoleaf Skylight
The Nanoleaf Skylight lighting up a room various shades of purple.

The Nanoleaf Skylight is a unique piece of hardware. Unlike most Nanoleaf products that are quick to install or easy to move and replace, the Skylight is designed as a permanent fixture in your home. Instead of simply plugging it into an electrical outlet, you'll need to hardwire it onto your ceiling – and once it's in place, you'll want it to stay there for years.

However, like all electronics, it's possible for your Nanoleaf Skylight to start acting up. And since there's no easy way to get the entire unit down from your ceiling, you might be wondering how you can quickly solve the problem. Thankfully, Nanoleaf designed a simple way for you to reset the Nanoleaf Skylight without the need to disassemble the entire setup.

Read more
Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra vs. Narwal Freo X Ultra: Which is the best premium robot vacuum?
Narwal Freo X Ultra with dock in home

Few robot vacuums and mops are as well-rounded as the Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra and Narwal Freo X Ultra. The two premium robots will vacuum and mop entirely on their own, before returning to their docks to automatically clean their mopheads and empty their dustbins. That sort of functionality doesn't come cheap, with both products carrying hefty price tags that'll put a big dent in your budget.

Because they're so expensive, you'll want to pay close attention to the differences between these two robot vacuums. Both are great additions to any household, but one might be a better fit for your needs than the other.

Read more
Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra vs. Roborock S8 Max Ultra: Which is the better robot vacuum?
The Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra placed in its dock.

The Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra and Roborock S8 Max Ultra are two of the newest additions to the Roborock family. Along with having almost identical names, these robot vacuums share much of the same spec sheet -- including the ability to mop and vacuum in a single cycle before automatically emptying their dustbin and cleaning their mops. They're impressive gadgets by all accounts, but since they're wildly expensive, you'll want to carefully compare the Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra and Roborock S8 Max Ultra before adding one to your home.

If you need help, here's a comprehensive look at these two premium robot vacuums, including a comparison of their vacuuming and mops skills, a look at their docking station perks, and a final determination of which is likely best for your needs. Keep in mind that you really can't go wrong with either product -- after all, they're two of the most expensive robots in the category -- but one might be a slightly better fit for your household than the other.
Pricing and availability

Read more