Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Android
  4. Legacy Archives

Hands on: Acer claims the Chromebook 13 has guts, so we put it to the test

Add as a preferred source on Google

Acer just took the wraps off the Chromebook 13, which is the first Chrome OS-powered notebook to run on Nvidia’s Tegra K1 processor, a chip designed to tackle graphics-intensive tasks while sipping on its host system’s battery.

RelatedAcer stuffs a Core i3 CPU into its C720 notebook

Recommended Videos

We recently had an opportunity to play with the Chromebook 13 during a private briefing with Acer, and we approached it with a certain question in mind: Does it makes sense to go for the Chromebook 13, which starts at $279.99, or should you get your mobile Chrome OS fix elsewhere?

Taking it to task

Acer heavily touted the Chromebook 13’s graphics processing chops, and talked about how it’s much better equipped to handle such tasks compared to the average Chromebook, typically equipped with low-power Samsung Exynos and Intel Celeron/Pentium processors with integrated GPUs.

Acer showcased the Chromebook 13’s graphics capabilities by opening The Bio Digital Human, a website that provides the user with a virtual, interactive representation of the body, individual organs, multiple bio-systems, and more. Indeed, the experience was pretty smooth. The site was made using WebGL, an API used to render 3D graphics in a Web browser. You can check out The Bio Digital Human site for yourself here.

The side of the Acer Chromebook 13's lid wears a Chrome an Acer logo.
The side of the Acer Chromebook 13’s lid wears a Chrome an Acer logo. Image used with permission by copyright holder

While the graphics-intensive site ran pretty well on the Chromebook 13 when we used it, we were told by an Acer rep that any Chromebook equipped with a processor aside from the Tegra K1 would have difficulty opening and navigating the site. Fortunately, we had an Acer C720p on hand to test that claim. The Bio Digital Human, and other WebGL sites like it, may run better or look prettier on the Acer Chromebook 13. But the Acer C720p, which is built around an Intel Celeron 2955U chip and an Intel HD Graphics GPU, opens and runs the site just fine as well.

When using the C720p, we dove into and out of the cardiovascular, skeletal, and other systems while experiencing only minor stuttering. The Acer Chromebook 13 may have superior graphics capabilities, but the contrasting weakness of competing Chromebooks when tackling comparable tasks was, at least in this case, overstated.

It’s worth noting that the Bio Digital Human site looks a lot better on the Chromebook 13 than it does on the C720p. Very few websites are built using WebGL at this point, however, so this particular perk is of questionable value to the average user. At the end of the day, Chromebooks are mostly used for basic Web browsing, word processing, and other everyday tasks. Can the Acer Chromebook 13 handle that? Yes, but so can other Chromebooks in its price range ($280 to $380).

Related: Asus outs a pair of Chromebooks powered by Intel Bay Trail CPUs

Acer also touted the Chromebook 13’s ability to handle multitasking. Yet when we opened multiple browser tabs and darted from one page to another, we experienced a noticeable amount of stuttering. The Acer Chromebook 13 didn’t lock up or exhibit any behavior like that, but we wouldn’t describe the experience as buttery-smooth either.

If the Chromebook 13 excels at anything, it’s staying on for as long as possible. Acer rates the Chromebook 13’s battery life at 13 hours for the 720p model, and 11 hours for the 1080p version. While we won’t be able to test these claims until we get a review unit in our hands, that’s quite impressive. For what it’s worth, Asus revealed a pair of 11.6-inch Chromebooks that the company said should get “up to” 10 hours of battery life.

When typing on the Chromebook 13’s keyboard, we felt that its keys had decent travel, and the touchpad was respectably sized. We didn’t get the sense that its plastic shell could take a hard beating, but it shouldn’t fall apart easily either.

Should you, or shouldn’t you?

Whether you should or shouldn’t get the Acer Chromebook 13 depends on where your priorities lie.

If battery life is high on your list of must-haves for any notebook, then you should probably give the Chromebook 13 a shot. If processing power is a bigger concern for you, then you should take a look at Acer’s C720, which the company announced not too long ago, and is one of the few Chromebooks with an Intel Core i-class (Core i3, to be exact) CPU.

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Computing Editor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
Gemini Notebook’s new Collections arrive just as Google turns it into a bigger workspace
Google is cleaning up notebook organization as the former NotebookLM expands across Gemini and Search
Gemini Notebook branding on a MacBook

Google has barely finished renaming NotebookLM, and it’s already addressing one of the headaches that comes with building a large research library.

Collections are rolling out to all Gemini Notebook users, giving them a way to group related notebooks while keeping everything visible under My Notebooks. The dashboard gets some structure without asking users to rearrange the library they’ve already built.

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
WhatsApp’s Liquid Glass redesign is finally coming to Mac after months of waiting
WhatsApp's Mac app is getting Apple's Liquid Glass-inspired makeover
WhatsApp

WhatsApp has been steadily adopting Apple's new design language across its apps, but Mac users have largely been left watching from the sidelines. That is finally beginning to change.

The messaging platform has started rolling out its Liquid Glass redesign for the WhatsApp Mac app, bringing the desktop experience much closer to what iPhone and iPad users have been seeing over the past few months. The update introduces a refreshed interface with redesigned navigation elements, updated menus, and a cleaner layout that aligns with Apple's latest software aesthetic. According to WABetaInfo, the rollout has begun through the latest Mac App Store update and is currently reaching a limited number of users.

Read more