Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

10,000 people bought into an elaborate Bitcoin pyramid scheme

Add as a preferred source on Google

What sounded like a high-tech investment was actually an old-fashioned Ponzi scheme — one thousands of people fell for, according to the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). The government agency is suing the man behind allegedly behind the fraud.

GAW Miners and ZenMiner, both founded by Homero Joshua Garza, promised would-be investors the chance to get in on a massive Bitcoin mining operation. The basic idea is that investors would pay for computer hardware that would then mine the virtual currency. The digital currency mined would then be given back to investors.

Recommended Videos

The problem: Very few computers were ever actually brought online to do the mining, according to an SEC press release on the matter.

“Investors were misled to believe they would share in returns earned by the Bitcoin mining activities,” says the release, “When in reality GAW Miners directed little or no computing power toward any mining activity.”

This isn’t to say no investors were paid — many thought they were getting returns from the operation. But all of that money came from later investors, making the entire operation was a pyramid scheme with a little bit of Bitcoin flavor. The SEC says most investors never got their full investment back, with only a few making any sort of profit.

It’s easy to think of this as yet another reason to avoid Bitcoin, and we’re sure media outlets will report this story as such. But at its heart, this scheme has less to do with Bitcoin and more to do with old-fashioned deception.

“As alleged in our complaint, Garza and his companies cloaked their scheme in technological sophistication and jargon, but the fraud was simple at its core: They sold what they did not own, misrepresented what they were selling, and robbed one investor to pay another,” said Paul G. Levenson, director of the SEC’s Boston regional office.

Investment, online and off, is risky — make sure you only work with people and institutions you know you can trust.

Justin Pot
Justin's always had a passion for trying out new software, asking questions, and explaining things – tech journalism is the…
Windows users can finally pick when updates stop with Microsoft’s latest patch
From pausing updates on your own schedule to rolling back a broken PC in one click, here's everything new in Windows 11's July 2026 update.
Windows 11 Laptop

Patch Tuesday updates are usually a shrug-and-install affair, but Microsoft's July 2026 release actually gives you something to be excited about.

You can grab this update, tagged KB5101650, right now through Settings, or manually via the Microsoft Update Catalog if you'd rather not wait for it to roll out.

Read more
Can AI audiobooks narrate better than humans? This study says many listeners think so
New study finds listeners favor AI narrated audiobooks over traditional human narration in blind testing.
Audiobooks on Spotify on an iPhone.

You might assume most listeners would pick a real human voice over a synthetic one, but a new study says otherwise. Edison Research at SSRS surveyed 1,005 fiction audiobook fans in May 2026 for a study commissioned by AI audio company Spoken. The twist is that listeners rated the AI narration higher, and they did not even know it was AI until after they heard it (via Variety).

Why listeners favored the AI narration

Read more
Gemini can make sense of the world around you, but don’t let it observe your children just yet
AI can spot what a child is doing, but figuring out what it means still takes a human expert
Kid using an iPad

Google's Gemini models are becoming remarkably good at understanding videos, images, and conversations. A new study shows AI can even identify subtle behaviors in parent-child interactions with impressive accuracy. But here's the catch: while Gemini can reliably observe what is happening, researchers say it should not be trusted to decide what those behaviors actually mean.

Worth noting is that the study used Gemini 2.5 Pro, which is not Google's most advanced AI. That means future models could improve the results even further. Even so, the researchers argue that human experts remain essential.

Read more