Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. News

Guy claims to delete his whole company — turns out it’s a hoax

Add as a preferred source on Google

Your week wasn’t worse than this guy’s — unless you also pretended to delete your entire company, and the work of hundreds of customers, with a single line of code. And then were found out after major news outlets picked up on your fake woe is me story.

Updated on 4-17-2016 by Lulu Chang: Marco Marsala’s alleged company deletion was nothing more than a marketing hoax.

Recommended Videos

Marco Marsala, who runs a web hosting company, claimed to make a fatal flaw that managed to delete the data of not only his own service, but that of his clients as well. Included in his code was the command “rm -rf,” which effectively tells a computer to delete just about everything. “Rm” is the remove command, “r” specifies everything within a directory, and “f” forces the command to push past the normal blockers that would prevent such a disaster from occurring. 

The small business owner then posted his alleged mistake to Server Fruit, a server forum. “I run a small hosting provider with more or less 1,535 customers and I use Ansible to automate some operations to be run on all servers,” he wrote. “Last night, I accidentally ran, on all servers, a Bash script with a rm -rf {foo}/{bar} with those variables undefined due to a bug in the code above this line.”

“All servers got deleted and the offsite backups too because the remote storage was mounted just before by the same script (that is a backup maintenance script). How I can recover from a rm -rf / now in a timely manner?”

Apparently, none of this was true.

On Friday, Stack Overflow, the organization behind the forum, told its members they’d been played. The cry for help “was actually just a hoax in some kind of viral marketing effort,” Stack Overflow said, explaining that an Italian newspaper picked up on the joke, and that Marsala told the publication, “it was just a joke.”

“The moderators on Server Fault have been in contact with the author about this, and as you can imagine, they’re not particularly amused by it,” Stack Overflow said in a statement.

We should have known it was too good to be true when Marsala claimed that he had a happy ending to his original story. “We consulted a data recovery company who analyzed one of our 1,500 server disks for a reasonable fee, and after diagnoses, sent … a list of recoverable files. All files are here. Now we’re finding the money to pay [them] for all our servers.” Marsala wrote in an update.

Yeah, because they were never gone to begin with.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more