Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. News

What not to do when you are testing a rig with a $70,000-plus camera on it

Add as a preferred source on Google

In the film-making world, camera operators are often the unsung heroes of a production. Utilizing their skills in order to achieve the look and movement that a director envisions is a difficult job, but they have tools to make things easier on them. One of those tools is what’s called a steadycam, and its purpose is exactly as its name implies — to keep the camera completely steady, allowing for smooth motion, even if the operator is running full speed after the subject of the shot. Without these amazing devices, many of the long moving shots that we see in movies this days would be impossible to pull off.

One camera operator attending Cine Gear, an industry trade show, over the weekend found out the hard way that showing off is never a good idea. In the video you can see the operator performing what appears to be a test of a steadycam stabilizer arm. You hear him ask about the movement of the product. Someone else, possibly the salesman, replies, and the operator then says, “This is crazy.” And then we see the man start to move the rig around a bit more wildly, and then he starts to jump — notice that the camera stays fairly still — and that is when you start to get that feeling in your stomach that something bad is about to happen.

Recommended Videos

The man lets go of the stabilizer arm, appearing to dance as he waves his hips back and forth, stepping farther away from the camera (which is still relatively stable considering) and then our worst fears are realized. A piece of the stabilizer arm appears to snap under the weight and strain being placed on it by being extended so far from the man, sending the camera — which appears to be an ARRI Alexa XT, which starts at a cool $70,000 — plummeting to the ground. The video cuts out before we see if the camera survives the crash, but in the absence of a miracle, it’s a safe bet to conclude that some damage was done, at the very least the stabilizer arm was ruined. If the camera or lens was damaged then the costs go higher very quickly.

Needless to say, we think this guy learned his lesson about showing off with expensive equipment.

Anthony Thurston
Anthony is an internationally published photographer based in the beautiful Pacific Northwest. Specializing primarily in…
Fujifilm Instax Mini 13 review: This instant camera won me over with its no-frills retro charm
From printing instant memories to rediscovering the fading charm of polaroids, Fujifilm's camera offers a budget route to a simple indulgence.
Fujifilm Instax mini 13 camera.

See at Amazon

Quick review

Read more
Want to try film photography? Kodak’s new $35 camera is a great place to start
This retro inspired Kodak EC35 camera keeps film photography refreshingly simple.
Kodak-EC35

If you've been curious about film photography but didn't want to spend a fortune, Kodak has a new camera worth checking out. The new Kodak EC35 is a reusable 35mm point-and-shoot camera that costs just $34.99, making it one of the most affordable ways to try shooting on film.

Developed by Reto Project under the Kodak brand, the EC35 keeps things simple with a lightweight design, automatic flash, and a pocket-friendly body. It also arrives as interest in analog photography continues to grow, offering beginners an inexpensive alternative to disposable film cameras.

Read more
The FCC’s latest crackdown could put more than DJI drones at risk in the US
Robot, Person, Face

DJI may have found creative ways to keep some of its products flowing into the US, but those efforts are now drawing increased attention from regulators. According to The Verge, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has started cracking down on several companies it believes could be helping DJI continue selling products in the country. These businesses have been described by industry observers as "DJI front companies" because they market or import products that appear to be closely tied to the Chinese drone maker while operating under different brand names.

DJI's alleged back door may be closing

Read more