Skip to main content

2015 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack review

No car under $100K delivers more grins than Dodge's Challenger R/T Scat Pack

2015 Dodge Challenger Scat Pack
Peter Braun/Digital Trends
2015 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack
MSRP $40,000.00
“The Dodge Challenger is a brute that outweighs some trucks. Thanks to remarkable engineering, and 485 horsepower, the Challenger Scat Pack is a brute that can do ballet. And at a starting price of $40,000 it is even a good deal in the bargain.”
Pros
  • Low price
  • Jaw-dropping engine
  • Excellent Brembo brakes
  • Fun-loving handling
Cons
  • Terrible visibility
  • Even worse fuel economy

“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“

Pressing the start button in the 2015 Dodge Challenger for the first time is earthshaking … literally. The 6.4-liter Hemi V8 snarls to life so angrily it shakes the car on its suspension, warning the driver that, while it may not be a Hellcat, it still has more than enough power to make them quake in their boots.

Recommended Videos

This warning would be apt; my week with Challenger R/T Scat Pack would have more thrills than I have experienced in anything under $100,000.

Simply put, the Challenger may have some flaws — and it does – but, in the form I drove it, it would be nearly impossible to have more fun while spending less money.

Welcome to the jungle

There are a lot of beasts in the Challenger jungle. In 2015, there are eight different trim levels, and four different engine options from the demure Pentastar V6 all the way up to the Hellcat’s supercharged 6.2-liter V8 with its pavement-rending, god-killing 707 horsepower. This broad range makes hard to pin down a definitive Challenger. For my money, though, the R/T with the 6.4-liter V8 is the defining model. It also happens to be what I drove for a week.

Hemi provided quite simply the best soundtrack I have ever experienced in a car.

With 485 horsepower, a 6.4-liter engine, Brembo brakes, and uprated suspension, the Scat Pack Challenger is just crazy enough to be fun under any conditions, without being downright terrifying. Having driven the Charger Hellcat, I can absolutely believe that the Challenger Hellcat’s first customer stuffed it within two miles of the dealership.

Even with “just” 485 horsepower, the Challenger is savage. Compared to the turbocharged cars I am used to, the no-replacement-for-displacement Hemi is a startling revelation. I spent my first few days in the car doing accidental burnouts, thanks to the twitchy throttle. Enough torque to break the wheels loose all the way up to highway speeds complemented this instant acceleration at low rpms.

A talented driver can reportedly manage the 0-to-60 sprint in 4.4 seconds and reach top speeds of 176 mph. I wouldn’t know.

I would know something about the sound and the experience. From startup to the last time I tapped the throttle before turning off the car, the Hemi provided quite simply the best soundtrack I have ever experienced in a car. When hard on the throttle, the Challenger roars like Thor on a bender. When cruising, though, it settles to a pleasantly angry thrum.

This magical melody amplifies one of the best acceleration experiences an enthusiast can find. I have been in quicker cars, but few that give the same sense of unending power. Still, there is far more to the car than just muscle-car quickness.

Big as a gorilla, agile as a monkey

The Challenger is a big car. Actually, that is an understatement … it is enormous. The 2015 model is 16 and a half feet long, and six and a half wide. And when fitted with the 6.4-liter V8 and an automatic transmission, it tips the scales at around 4,200 pounds. Part of the reason drivers should consider lucky to get 15 mpg.

Driving the Challenger quickly is like watching a gorilla do ballet: if you are paying attention to the footwork, you are missing the point.

It feels every bit of its size, in part because it is damn difficult to see out of. But, once moving, the car is capable of some truly stunning feats of handling. Dodge’s engineers have done an amazing job with the suspension, making the car firm and planted. The Scat Pack rides on a lowered suspension, beefed up with Bilstein dampers.

After accidentally breaking the rear wheels loose at 40 mph, any sensible person will drive the Challenger with a healthy nimbus of fear. But, even so, the Challenger is easy to throw through corners with confidence. The big, sticky rear tires may not be up to reining in 485 hp, but they can hold the car to the pavement with the force of a terrified monkey.

The person who really deserves the most credit is whoever designed the steering. American muscle cars have a bad history of imprecise, float-y steering. Not the Challenger. Set in sport mode the steering is heavy, but fast and remarkably precise. It’s impressive.

2015-Dodge-Challenger-back-angle
Peter Braun/Digital Trends
Peter Braun/Digital Trends

Backing all of this up is the second best reason to get the Scat Pack after the 6.4-liter motor: Brembo brakes. The regular R/T has fine brakes, but they fade badly after a few uses. The big, four-piston Brembos don’t just offer excellent fade free braking but also excellent feel through the pedals.

Don’t mistake the Challenger; even in Scat Pack form, for a sports car,  it’s not that precise and it’s just too darn big. Driving the Challenger quickly is like watching a gorilla do ballet: If you are paying attention to the footwork, you are missing the point.

The coupiest coupe to ever coupe

For 2015 the Challenger gets updated styling including a new rear end and a split front grille inspired by the 1971 Challenger. It also gets an immensely improved interior, including a stylish, retro gauge cluster and a large Uconnect infotainment screen packed with performance apps.

Dodge’s engineers have done an amazing job with the suspension, making the car firm and planted.

The new interior also boasts big comfortable seats, making the Challenger fairly comfortable for long journeys. There are however some issues.

For instance, the visibility is terrible. The windshield is short, the pillars are enormous, and it is nearly impossible to tell where the car ends. Even the rear view camera leaves a lot to be desired. At times, driving the Challenger feels like maneuvering a mailbox.

There is also the issue of the rear seats. They are large enough for actual humans, but incredibly hard to get to for people who possess bones.

If this sounds like criticism, it’s not. The Challenger was never going to be a practical car. By making the sacrifices they did, though, the designers ensured it would be fun and incredibly good looking.

2015-Dodge-Challenger-front-angle
Peter Braun/Digital Trends
Peter Braun/Digital Trends

A coupe is probably the least practical vehicle design. It sacrifices interior room, exterior size, cargo capacity, and – often — visibility all for the sake of style and fun. By that measure, the Challenger is the ultimate coupe. It’s as if Dodge’s designers sat down and consciously decided to compromise practicality for pleasure at every turn. And, frankly, I am glad they did. Often, a car that tries to do too many things does none well.

Conclusion

My Challenger Scat Pack cost just $47,000. A stripped down version with a manual transmission starts at $39,000. That is insanely good value for a car that provides the sort of fun I normally associate with super cars. Driving the car to the store and back is an occasion. To that end, driving the car quickly is a joy.

Before I get too carried away, I do have one word of caution: build quality.

The interior feels well made. Looking closely at the car, though, worrying details begin to appear. My demonstrator had several disturbingly large gaps in its weather-stripping. And large panel gaps throughout the interior and exterior. This was reflected by a shocking amount of wind noise at high speeds. I am leery from drawing too many conclusions from this, but, then again, there is no such thing as a free lunch.

Still, if I had around $40,000 to spend on a car, I know exactly what I would be getting … and it would be a Challenger Scat Pack with a manual. I know this because my wife told me.

Highs

  • Low price
  • Jaw-dropping engine
  • Excellent Brembo brakes
  • Fun-loving handling

Lows

  • Terrible visibility
  • Even worse fuel economy
Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
tesla robotaxi feud alef in transition flight

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
Buckle up, folks — this week we’re taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let’s bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities.
Even if you’re mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it’s become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we’re talking about this week’s public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump.
What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump’s election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about the driver-assist system's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow.
When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla.
It didn’t help that the Trump administration followed Musk’s recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis.
The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk’s companies, it’s unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it.
Back to the tech
Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology.
For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it’s the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators.
Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon’s upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech.
For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception.
Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo, or compete effectively with Zoox?
We’ll have to wait and see.
Flying cars
In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle.
What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey.
But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation’s Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby’s slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more... driveable.
Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the “car” back in “flying car.” This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it’s not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year.
On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It’s refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world.
But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer).
The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights.
While the $300,000 price tag won’t fit everyone’s budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don’t have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.

Read more
8 key things you need to know from Apple’s WWDC 2025 event
From a fresh look and updated names, to new features, more intelligence and live translation
iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS 26 shown on devices.

The WWDC 2025 keynote ran for just over an hour and a half. For those of you who don't fancy sitting through the whole presentation, we've pulled out the key things you need to know from the latest Apple event.

1. Welcome to the 26 club

Read more
Tesla’s robotaxi service is almost here, but it’s not the car you want to see
Silver Tesla Model Y Juniper side

Tesla chief Elon Musk has said that the automaker is aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, in Austin, Texas.

“Tentatively, June 22,” Musk said in a post on X on Tuesday, adding: “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.”

Read more