Skip to main content

Fiat-Chrysler suddenly withdraws industry-rattling merger proposal with Renault

Renault Twingo
Ronan Glon/Digital Trends

Fiat-Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) has spent several years looking for a partner to merge with in order to save money on research and development. It looked like its search was finally over, it sent Paris-based Renault a proposal that outlined the terms of a 50/50 merger, but it suddenly withdrew its offer on June 5, 2019.

Recommended Videos

Renault was still examining FCA’s offer to create the third-largest automaker in the world when the Franco-Italian firm’s executives pulled their offer. “It has become clear that the political conditions in France do not currently exist for such a combination to proceed successfully,” FCA wrote in a statement without elaborating. The French government owns a 15% stake in Renault, and this small but significant slice complicated the ongoing negotiations between the two parties.

French newspaper Le Figaro learned the French government wanted time to convince Nissan, one of Renault’s partner, to approve the merger. The deal didn’t need Nissan’s seal of approval, it has no say in how Renault runs its business, but government officials believed asking for Nissan’s blessing would preserve the 20-year-old alliance between the two automakers. FCA was in a hurry; it wanted to close the deal as quickly as possible. It allegedly left the negotiation table when the government officials asked Renault to delay its vote by five days.

What could have happened?

On paper, the deal would have saved both companies a tremendous amount of money without forcing them to take controversial measures like closing factories. In its statement, FCA explained a merger would have allowed the two automakers to build cars on common underpinnings, to jointly develop technology (notably, but not exclusively, for electric and autonomous vehicles), and to jointly purchase parts and materials from third-party suppliers. For example, Renault could have conceivably replaced its pocket-sized Twingo city car (pictured) with a model built using the same hardware and software found under the next-generation Fiat 500 expected to make its debut in 2020. Odds are the two cars would have looked nothing alike, but they’d have used many common parts under the sheet metal.

The point was to save money, not to create a Renault that looks like a Fiat, drives like a Jeep, and sounds like an Alfa Romeo.

FCA’s portfolio of brands includes Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, Ram, Maserati, Lancia, Fiat, and Alfa Romeo. Renault — which hasn’t sold a car in the United States since 1987 — also owns a Romanian budget brand named Dacia, and it owns stakes in Nissan, Mitsubishi, and Russia-based Lada. The merger would have had a tremendous impact on all of these automakers, and it could have reshaped the pecking order in the global automotive industry, but car buyers likely wouldn’t have noticed the difference. The brands that would have ended up grouped under the same umbrella would have kept their respective identities. The point was to save money, not to create a Renault that looks like a Fiat, drives like a Jeep, and sounds like an Alfa Romeo.

The two companies complemented each other well; Renault is strong where FCA is weak, and vice versa. Renault notably has a sizable presence in Europe, and it has made big investments in electrification technology. FCA sells most of its cars in North America, and it has decades of experience in building pickup trucks, SUVs, and crossovers. Dacia is positioned lower on the new car market than any of FCA’s divisions, while Alfa Romeo and Maserati compete higher than any of Renault’s brands. Fused together, their portfolios would have covered nearly every segment of the new car and truck market around the world.

In an interesting twist of automotive history, Renault and Jeep have collaborated in the past. In 1979, Renault purchased a controlling stake in American Motors Corporation (AMC), which owned Jeep at the time. AMC manufactured two Renault models named Encore and Alliance, respectively, in its Kenosha, Wisconsin, factory and sold them through its American dealer network. As a trade-off, Renault distributed Jeep’s CJ-7 and Cherokee through its European dealer network, sometimes with its own engines. Renault sold AMC — including Jeep — to Chrysler in 1987.

Updated on June 5, 2019: Added information about FCA withdrawing its offer.

Ronan Glon
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
Jeep Compass EV breaks cover—but will it come to the U.S.?
jeep compass ev us newjeepcompassfirsteditionhawaii  4

Jeep just pulled the wraps off the all-new Compass EV, and while it’s an exciting leap into the electric future, there's a catch—it might not make it to the U.S. anytime soon.
This is a brand new electric version of the Jeep Compass, and being built on Stellantis' STLA platform—the same architecture underpinning models like the Peugeot E-3008 and E-5008—it looks much slicker and packs a lot more inside than previous versions of the Compass.
Let’s start with what’s cool: the new Compass EV is packing up to 404 miles of range on a single charge, a 74 kWh battery, and fast-charging that gets you from 20% to 80% in about 30 minutes. Not bad for a compact SUV with Jeep's badge on the nose.
There are two versions: a front-wheel-drive model with 213 horsepower and a beefier all-wheel-drive version with 375 horsepower. That AWD setup isn’t just for looks—it can handle 20% inclines even without front traction, and comes with extra ground clearance and better off-road angles. In short, it’s still a Jeep.
The design's been refreshed too, and inside you’ll find the kind of tech and comfort you’d expect in a modern EV—sleek, smart, and ready for both city streets and dirt trails.
But here’s the thing: even though production starts soon in Italy, Jeep hasn’t said whether the Compass EV is coming to America. And the signs aren’t promising.
Plans to build it in Canada were recently put on hold, with production now delayed until at least early 2026. Some of that might have to do with possible U.S. tariffs on Canadian and Mexican vehicles—adding a layer of uncertainty to the whole rollout.
According to Kelley Blue Book, a Stellantis spokesperson confirmed that the company has “temporarily paused work on the next-generation Jeep Compass, including activities at” the Canadian plant that was originally meant to build the model. They added that Stellantis is “reassessing its product strategy in North America” to better match customer needs and demand for different powertrain options.
So while Europe and other markets are gearing up to get the Compass EV soon, American drivers might be left waiting—or miss out entirely.
That’s a shame, because on paper, this electric Jeep hits a lot of sweet spots. Let’s just hope it finds a way over here.

Read more
Tesla just scrapped the Cybertruck range extender
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

The writing was pretty much on the wall for the Cybertruck range extender last month when Tesla removed the option from its website. Now, it’s officially scrapped it and is refunding the $2,000 deposits that customers put down for the $16,000 battery pack. 

“We are no longer planning to sell the range extender for Cybertruck," Tesla said in a message to customers on Wednesday, adding, "As a result, we will be refunding your deposit in full.”

Read more
Zoox recalls robotaxis after Las Vegas crash, citing software fix
zoox recall crash 1739252352 robotaxi side profile in dark mode

Amazon's self-driving vehicle unit, Zoox, has issued a voluntary safety recall after one of its autonomous vehicles was involved in a minor collision in Las Vegas. The incident, which occurred in April 2025, led the company to investigate and identify a software issue affecting how the robotaxi anticipates another vehicle’s path.
The recall, affecting 270 Zoox-built vehicles, was formally filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Zoox said the issue has already been addressed through a software update that was remotely deployed to its fleet.
Zoox’s robotaxis, which operate without driving controls like a steering wheel or pedals, are part of Amazon’s entry into the autonomous driving space. According to Zoox’s safety recall report, the vehicle failed to yield to oncoming traffic while making an unprotected left turn, leading to a low-speed collision with a regular passenger car. While damage was minor, the event raised flags about the system’s behavior in complex urban scenarios.
Establishing safety and reliability remain key factors in the deployment of the relatively new autonomous ride-hailing technology. Alphabet-owned Waymo continues to lead the sector in both safety and operational scale, with services active in multiple cities including Phoenix and San Francisco. But GM’s Cruise and Ford/VW-backed Argo AI were forced to abandon operations over the past few years.
Tesla is also expected to enter the robotaxi race with the launch of its own service in June 2025, leveraging its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. While FSD has faced heavy regulatory scrutiny through last year, safety regulations are expected to loosen under the Trump administration.
Zoox, which Amazon acquired in 2020, says it issued the recall voluntarily as part of its commitment to safety. “It’s essential that we remain transparent about our processes and the collective decisions we make,” the company said in a statement.

Read more