Skip to main content

Inside McLaren F1’s Mission Control room: How data make race wins possible

Ron Dennis, McLaren Technology Group’s CEO, has incredible presence. Seated in front of the current MP4-31 Formula One car at the company’s hyper-modern Technology Centre in Woking, U.K., he spoke in a calm, steady tone of voice and with absolute authority. “Winning is what it’s all about,” he said.

This was no throwaway phrase. It’s a philosophy found in every minute detail throughout its road cars, race cars, the Centre itself, and even the placement of the trophy cabinets, which are in direct view of the race preparation team, and must be passed by everyone who visits the swish cafeteria. The commitment to breeding and promoting success is almost overwhelming.

However, it soon became clear the drive to win only gets you so far in modern Formula One racing; and perhaps surprisingly, an endless flow of data plays an equally critical role. McLaren has signed a new three-year technology partnership with NTT Communications — a Japanese company best known around the world for operating the NTT DoCoMo mobile network in Japan — to assist in managing that data, and to expedite its journey between the team and almost every department involved in getting a race car onto the starting grid, and past the checkered flag.

We went inside McLaren’s headquarters and into to its secretive Mission Control room during the live practice session leading up to the 2016 British Grand Prix for a glimpse at how this data is used.

Inside Mission Control

The best analogy for what McLaren’s Mission Control room is like is to think of NASA’s Houston control room seen in movies like Apollo 13. Except unlike those images, Mission Control at McLaren is more serene than a Japanese water garden. Stress, we were told, is not conducive to making a strategy, and even in the aftermath of McLaren driver Fernando Alonso’s horrific crash at Australia, pulses barely quickened.

McLaren’s super computers run 300,000 race simulations per second.

It’s made up of three rows, where automotive engineers, strategists, and aerodynamicists – most with science or math-related degrees – are seated in a five-five-three formation, all giving one-hundred-percent focus on the task in hand. The front row of five monitor the engine and drivetrain, the second row examines suspension and other components, while the final three are all race engineers.

Here, data is king. McLaren’s super computers run 300,000 race simulations per second, matching data taken from the car in real time against predictive models to optimize the strategy. “We simulate everything,” a McLaren representative told Digital Trends, without a hint of over exaggeration.

“A Grand Prix car is an intelligent vehicle with phenomenal processing power,” explained Dennis, describing the task of managing and formatting the data as, “complex beyond comprehension.” There are up to 300 sensors fitted to an F1 car, and data is often processed by a specific part of it — braking force, tire pressure, vibration, and G forces are all monitored and processed by each individual wheel hub, for example.

The importance of data

Practice is when Mission Control is at its busiest. Due to F1 rules, once the race weekend begins in earnest, little can be changed on the car, so Friday practice is when the hard work is done. TV screens show the official televised coverage, while each engineer has two monitors, sometimes with up to 20 individual — and to the layperson, utterly baffling — data feeds on each one. The group as a whole sees even more graphs showing lap times, speeds, running order, and individual driver parameters such as acceleration, braking, gear changes, and even steering angles.

None of them speak to the driver directly — only the driver’s personal race engineer on the pit wall can do that — but they do listen to radio transmissions, and relay information to the team using voice and messaging services. Listening in on the conversations, track conditions are discussed, fuel levels analyzed, and track position managed to ensure the fastest lap is run with the least interference, right at the time when the track is at its best.

NTT CEO Tetsuya Shoji and McLaren Technology Group CEO Ron Dennis.
NTT CEO Tetsuya Shoji and McLaren Technology Group CEO Ron Dennis. Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Without precise, instant data, none of this would be possible. An astonishing 100GB of data is collected during the course of a race weekend — that’s 100GB of sensor-derived data, don’t forget, not something giant like a 4K video file — and it needs to be transferred from the track to Mission Control, and to McLaren’s engine partner Honda, at key points during the weekend and in an extremely short amount of time. Sometimes the window is as little as 15 minutes.

This is where NTT Communications comes in. “Transferring data instantly is an essential element of racing management,” Tetsuya Shoji, NTT’s CEO told us, and like McLaren, the company runs its own simulations to ensure everything works as it should. After all, there’s considerable potential for disaster when networks are put under such immense strain. An NTT Communications representative described the spike during transfer as being like Black Friday sales traffic online: “It’s nothing, nothing, nothing, then everything all in one go.” The data and its safe, secure transfer is so critical, NTT has backup systems in place, should anything go wrong.

Data flows outside Mission Control

By Sunday evening the race is over, but all the data collected continues to live. It moves out of Mission Control’s hands, is fed into predictive models, and married up with existing data sets to create new plans. It’s then used by those building the cars. McLaren adds one new component onto its car every 20 minutes, every day, all year round. “Our ability to process data makes improvements possible,” said Dennis succinctly. It works too. The 2016 McLaren F1 car is 3.5 seconds faster than the 2015 car, thanks in no small part to data management and interpretation.

“Autonomy will change our world in the next ten years.”

It’s not just computer and sensor data that’s important to the McLaren team. It has a rich racing history, and similarly covets the data that comes from that. One way is how it treats classic, retired racing cars. While other teams sell or dismantle them, McLaren has a collection of 600, spanning many generations, stored in a warehouse, and engineers still learn from them today.

All this talk of super computers, data, and insanely fast transfer speeds can make you forget there is a man at the heart of the McLaren racing car. Formula One rules forbid the use of biometric monitoring, so there’s no heart rate, temperature, or brain activity scans here. Instead, the team gets physical data from braking force and steering inputs, then from a rapid fire debriefing session after the race. Apparently, it’s quite normal for a driver to talk continuously for five minutes, covering everything from the car’s performance and feel, to his own physical condition.

Autonomous future

It’s a rare privilege to see how data is used by McLaren, one of the most notoriously secretive teams in F1, and the effect it has on the team’s race efforts. The serenity of Mission Control mirrored the essential, continuous, and uninterrupted flow of data that keeps it alive, and was a stark juxtaposition to the noise and fury of the cars on track.

It may sound like a cliche, but the intelligence that comes from analyzing all this data collected from F1 racing affects the world around us. Right now, McLaren software developed to understand where cars are on the race track is used to land planes at London’s Heathrow airport, and it’s here, using its understanding of how things work, perform, and operate with limited human assistance, where McLaren’s looking next. “Autonomy will change our world in the next ten years,” concluded Dennis, and it’s by mastering the flow of data the change will be possible.

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
Waymo faces questions about its use of onboard cameras for AI training, ads targeting
Two people exit a Waymo taxi.

In an iconic scene from the 2002 sci-fi film Minority Report, on-the-run Agent John Anderton, played by Tom Cruise, struggles to walk through a mall as he’s targeted by a multitude of personalized ads from the likes of Lexus, Guinness and American Express, everytime hidden detectors identify his eyes.
It was clearly meant as a warning about a not-so-desirable dystopian future.
Yet, 23 years later that future is at least partlially here in the online world and threatens to spread to other areas of daily life which are increasingly ‘connected’, such as the inside of cars. And the new testing grounds, according to online security researcher Jane Manchun Wong, might very well be automated-driving vehicles, such as Waymo’s robotaxis.
On X, Wong unveiled an unreleased version of Waymo’s privacy policy that suggests the California-based company is preparing to use data from its robotaxis, including interior cameras, to train generative AI models and to offer targetted ads.
“Waymo may share data to improve and analyze its functionality and to tailor products, services, ads, and offers to your interests,” the Waymo’s unreleased privacy statement reads. “You can opt out of sharing your information with third parties, unless it’s necessary to the functioning of the service.”
Asked for comments about the unreleased app update, Waymo told The Verge that it contained “placeholder text that doesn’t accurately reflect the feature’s purpose”.
Waymo’s AI-models “are not designed to use this data to identify individual people, and there are no plans to use this data for targeted ads,” spokesperson Julia Ilina said.
Waymo’s robotaxis, which are operating on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin, do contain onboard cameras that monitor riders. But Ilina says these are mainly used to train AI models for safety, finding lost items, check that in-car rules are followed, and to improve the service.
The new feature is still under development and offers riders an opportunity to opt out of data collection, Ilina says.
But as we all get used to ads targeting based on everything that’s somehow connected to the web, it seems a once-distant vision of the future may be just around the corner.

Read more
Waymo’s driverless cars are about to begin an overseas adventure
Waymo Jaguar I-Pace

Waymo’s autonomous cars are about to appear on streets outside of the U.S. for the first time.

The company on Wednesday announced on social media that its autonomous cars will be driving onto the streets of Tokyo, Japan, “soon,” with some reports suggesting the rollout will begin as early as next week.

Read more
Buy Now, Upgrade Later: Slate’s $25K Truck Flips the Script on EVs
many hybrids rank as most reliable of all vehicles evs progress consumer reports cr tout cars 0224

A new electric vehicle startup—quietly backed by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos—is building something bold in Michigan. Not just a car, but a whole new idea of what an EV company can be. Slate Auto is a stealthy new automaker with one mission: ditch the luxury-first EV playbook and start from the affordable —which most drivers actually seek.
The start-up has been operating out of public sight since 2022, until TechCrunch found out about its existence. Of course, creating a little mystery about a potentially game-changing concept is a well-tested marketing approach.
But Slate truly seems to approach EVs in a very different way than most: It isn’t debuting with a six-figure spaceship-on-wheels. Instead, it's targeting the holy grail of EV dreams: a two-seat electric pickup truck for just $25,000. Yep, twenty-five grand. That’s less than a tricked-out golf cart in some neighborhoods. Slate is flipping the Tesla model on its head. Tesla, but also the likes of Lucid, BMW, and to a certain degree, Rivian, all started with high-end vehicles to build brand and bankroll future affordable car. But Slate wants to start with the people’s pickup—and letting it grow with you.
This isn’t just a cheap car. It’s a modular, upgradeable EV that’s meant to be personalized over time. Buy the basic model now, then add performance, tech, or lifestyle upgrades later—kind of like building your own dream ride one paycheck at a time. It’s a DIY car for a generation raised on customization and subscriptions. The company even trademarked the phrase: “We built it. You make it.”
Backing up this idea is an equally bold strategy: selling accessories, apparel, and utility add-ons à la Harley-Davidson and Jeep’s MoPar division. You’re not just buying a vehicle; you’re buying into a lifestyle. Think affordable EV meets open-source car culture.
Slate's approach isn't just novel—it's almost rebellious. At a time when other startups risk folding under the weight of their own lofty ambitions, Slate is keeping things lean, scalable, and customer focused. The company reportedly plans to source major components like battery packs and motors from outside suppliers, keeping manufacturing costs low while focusing energy on design, experience, and upgrade paths.
Sure, it’s all been kept under wraps—until now. With plans to begin production near Indianapolis by next year, the wraps are about to come off this EV underdog.
While, at least in spirit, the U.S. market has been dominated by high-end EVs, Slate’s “start small, scale with you” philosophy might be just the jolt the industry needs.

Read more