Skip to main content

Uber must face Lyft driver lawsuit arising from alleged fake rides

uber settles driver background check case man driving in car the city ride share lyft getaround zipcar
Lightpoet/Shutterstock
A Lyft driver who filed suit against Uber over alleged fake rides will get to present his case in public court. Uber wanted the case decided by arbitration behind closed doors, but last week a San Francisco state judge denied that move, according to Bloomberg.

Ryan Smythe says he and many other Lyft drivers wasted time responding to non-existent ride calls, and he claims the calls were made by Uber drivers encouraged by their company in a driver recruiting program called Operation SLOG. Smythe alleges Uber drivers used disposable phones so the calls could not be traced back to them.

Related Videos

“Uber Technologies Inc. did this to discourage Lyft drivers from contracting with Lyft, to deprive the marketplace of Lyft drivers so that Uber drivers would benefit, and to create a higher wait time for Lyft customers in order to steer their patronage to Uber,” Smythe said.

Uber has an arbitration clause in its driver contract that inhibits its own drivers from filing lawsuits. Uber argued that, because Smythe, like many San Francisco area drivers, drove for both Uber and Lyft, he couldn’t take Uber to court and would be bound by the arbitration clause.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Mary E. Wiss disagreed with Uber’s position. In her ruling, Wiss wrote that Smythe’s suit “is directly tied to his separate role as Lyft driver and the harm he allegedly suffered in that capacity.” Following that logic, therefore, the lawsuit claims “fall outside the scope of the arbitration agreement.”

So Smythe will get his day in court.

Competition for drivers between Lyft and Uber is intense. The two largest U.S. ridesharing companies are fighting for market share. At the same time, both Uber and Lyft are engaged in developing self-driving vehicles for use in urban areas.

Editors' Recommendations

Uber responds to gig-economy law by testing driver-led bidding system
Uber Driver

Uber drivers in California will be able to set their own fares as part of a new pilot program, which the rideshare company is testing as a response to the state’s new gig-economy law that categorizes individual contractors of a company as employees. 

The Wall Street Journal reports that the company will begin testing the feature starting Tuesday, January 21. Drivers with passengers going to or from the Santa Barbara, Palm Springs, or Sacramento airports can charge their passengers up to five times the regular ride fare. 

Read more
Lawyers in latest sexual assault lawsuit against Lyft expect more women to join
lyft car

Lyft is being sued by a group of more than 20 women who say they were raped or sexually assaulted while using the ridesharing service. This is the second such lawsuit against the company in four months. The story was first reported by the Washington Post.

Mike Bomberger, a partner at the California law firm Estey and Bomberger LLC, told Digital Trends that in 80 percent of these complaints, the women were drunk or somehow vulnerable, and the driver assaulted or raped them in the vehicle.

Read more
Uber may be banned in London. Could the same thing happen in the U.S.?
The Uber app being used in London, England

The city of London on Monday announced it would revoke Uber’s operating license for the second time in two years over “persistent safety problems." The move means that the app might soon be banned in a city that's grown accustomed to easy rideshares, just as many American cities rely on similar apps.

For reasons that include safety issues for both riders and drivers, further congestion in cities, workers’ protections, and bucking regulations, Uber, Lyft, and similar apps have been a target of ire since they first appeared on the streets and disrupted how ordinary people around the world commute. That means they’ve been banned and fined multiple times over now -- and while some American cities want to crack down on ridesharing apps, there's little many of them can do to outright ban them as London, Uber's largest European market, is attempting to do.

Read more