Skip to main content

‘Risky persona’ phone addicts have the most distraction-caused accidents

Phone addicts lead the list of ‘risky persona’ drivers in Zendrive’s nationwide study of driving behaviors. Aggressive drivers and speed demons are also more likely than most to have accidents, according to the report, but distracted smartphone junkies lead the pack.

Most states have laws against texting, and a growing number forbid handheld phone calls while driving. Despite the laws, distracted driving was cited as the primary cause of accidents that resulted in 3,450 fatalities in the U.S. Department of Transportation’s 2016 Fatal Traffic Crash Data, the latest year reported.

Recommended Videos

Zendrive’s Driver Personas study employed machine learning methodology to analyze the behavior of 2.3 million anonymized U.S. drivers from December 2016 to February 2017. During that period, the group traveled 5.6 billion miles.

Drivers were grouped in cluster profiles during the first two weeks of the study. Seven factors determined the persona groupings:

  • Trip duration
  • Percent of miles driven on weekends
  • Hard brake and aggressive acceleration events per 100 miles of driving
  • Percent of hours driving at night
  • Percent of miles driven on highways
  • Percent of time speeding
  • Percent of time using the phone.

Measured by their deviance from average behaviors, six driver personas emerged from the study. The relative risk for each driver persona was calculated by dividing the total number of collisions by the number of drivers.

Three groups with the highest risk levels comprised 29 percent of all drivers: Phone Addicts (12 percent), Frustrated Lead-Footers (9 percent), and Speed Demons (8 percent). Phone addicts spent 3.2 times more than average on the phone while driving.

Frustrated Lead-Footers, 9 percent of drivers, had 2.9 times more than average acceleration and deceleration events per 100 miles. Speed demons, 8 percent of the study subject, exceeded legal limits 5.9 times more often than average drivers.

The remaining 79 percent of drivers, considered low risk, were: Neighborhood Navigators, Expert Commuters, and Weekend Cruisers. Defined as people who drive on highways only 0.5 percent of the time, Neighborhood Navigators made up the largest low-risk group, accounting for 29 percent of drivers.

Expert Commuters account for 26 percent of drivers and drive 1.4 times more driving on highways than average. Weekend Cruisers, the final low-risk group make up 18 percent of drivers and drive 1.9 times more on weekends than other drivers.

Do you wonder why your car insurance is so high? Check out the full Zendrive report, for higher and lower risk driver populations of each state. The ten states with the highest concentration of high-risk personas extend from Texas to Florida. The ten states with the lowest proportion of high-risk drivers are scattered across the northern border states, from Maine to Washington state.

Concern about driving and talking safety isn’t new. Almost fourteen years ago Digital Trends reported the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association’s (CTIA) recommended practices for phone use while driving.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
I tried an e-bike for the first time and now I’m hooked
It’s not about being a 'bike person', it’s about finding small upgrades to everyday life
A woman sitting on the Aventon Pace 4

Before this year, I’d never even touched an e-bike before, and the thought of riding one was never on my radar. With life already in constant motion thanks to two toddlers, biking wasn’t something I ever considered adding to the mix.

I’d always assumed e-bikes were for hardcore commuters or serious cyclists, not someone like me. I wasn’t looking for a big lifestyle change. I just wanted a quicker way to get to the park so we’d have more time to play before dinner.

Read more
This week in EV tech: Audi exemplifies auto industry’s EV holding pattern
Close-up of 2025 Audi SQ5 grille, headlight, and badge.

The road to the future runs through the present, and it’s not a straight line. This week, we’re focusing on how Audi is negotiating the twists and turns on the way to an electrified future. EVs are here to stay at Audi, but a gasoline crossover SUV is still the automaker’s bestselling model, and it’s not ready to risk those sales just yet. That’s why the 2025 Audi Q5 received a top-to-bottom overhaul for this model year, bringing its tech features and styling up to date without altering the what has proven to be a very popular package. By maintaining parallel lineups of electric and internal-combustion cars, Audi hopes to give customers more choices. But that doesn’t completely level the playing field. The new Q5 may have yesterday’s powertrain, but Audi isn’t holding back on tech. It features the same electrical architecture, operating system, and three-screen dashboard display as the latest Audi EVs, like the Q6 e-tron. So aside from a little engine noise, there’s little difference in what you can see and interact with from the driver’s seat. It’s not just the infotainment systems. The Q5 and Q6 e-tron are close in size, with similar space for passengers across their two rows of seats. The Q6 e-tron has a bit more cargo space, but not as much as you’d think given the lack of a bulky engine, transmission, and driveshafts. The two SUVs also have similar styling but, having now driven both, we can say that the Q5 is the more pleasant of the two.

More than a difference of powertrain tech

Read more
Take a peek inside the factory making tomorrow’s ride
A Zoox robotaxi.

Amazon-owned Zoox has opened its first facility producing fully autonomous robotaxis. 

A video (above) released by the California-based company offers a peek inside the factory, which, when it reaches full capacity, could roll out as many as 10,000 autonomous vehicles per year.

Read more