Skip to main content

Preston Tucker’s own Tucker 48 to fetch at least $1.25 million at RM Sotheby’s

The Tucker 48 is perhaps one of automotive history’s greatest flops. What started as a big post-World War II ambition to take on Detroit’s booming “Big Three” (General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford) ended in failure from a whirlwind of negative media publicity, and political and economic woes. The story of Preston Tucker and his Tucker 48 also went on to become one of the single greatest examples of corporate arrogance and media exploitation in American history.

Amid stagnant lineups from the Big Three, which provided great opportunity for smaller carmakers to take some of the limelight, Preston Tucker founded the Tucker Corporation in 1944. Prior to going defunct, Tucker produced one model to compete with Detroit’s automotive strongholds. Known as the “48,” named after its introductory year of 1948, only 51 made it through production before Tucker Corporation ceased operations in 1949.

Because of their rarity, original Tucker 48s (a few replicas do exist) are considered quite the automotive gold in the world of classic and vintage automobiles. When a 1948 Tucker aired on NBC’s It’s Worth What? in 2011, it was said to be valued at $1.2 million. Now, world-renowned auction house RM Sotheby’s just announced that a new Tucker 48 will cross its block at Arizona’s auction later this year under lot number 137. Except, lot number 137 isn’t just one of the 51 Tucker 48s made. It’s a Tucker 48, once personally owned and used by Preston himself.

Recommended Videos

As the story goes for Tucker 48 production number 1029, this specific car was used in the original promotional film The Tucker: The Man and the Car to advertise the vehicle in the fall of 1948. It then served as a test mule for high-speed test runs at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Upon retirement from that role, Preston took ownership of number 1029, where him and his family used it as primary transportation for seven years.

Since then, it changed hands numerous times, particularly through some of the world’s most renowned collectors. One such collector was Winthrop Rockefeller, the would-be Governor of Arkansas in 1955 and family member of the esteemed American industrial tycoon, who purchased number 1029 from Preston that year.

Fast-forward to today, and RM Sotheby’s estimates Tucker 48 number 1029 could fetch anywhere between $1.25 million to $1.5 million when the hammer closes the bidding sessions. It includes all original documentation of previous ownerships, along with mileage and service logs that authentically prove its mileage of only 19,199 on the odometer. Over its history, the paint’s been refinished and its interior, reupholstered.

It’s no $38 million 1962 Ferrari 250 GTO from the Pebble Beach auction of 2014. But any car that fetches as much as a house and beyond is still impressive, to say the least.

Tucker shares its startup story with other small-time successes, like Studebaker, who took advantage of the Big Three’s dip in success for not producing new car designs since 1941. Though unlike Studebaker, who took a more conservative approach to designing some of the first all-new, post-war automobiles, Tucker went for a more innovative and revolutionary approach. Preston Tucker insisted on producing a new car with modern styling and a focus on innovative features. For instance, he specified that his new car must have a water-cooled aluminum block fuel-injected, flat-six engine mounted aft ward like in a Volkswagen Beetle, four-wheel disc brakes, and four-wheel independent suspension, and a driver-centric interior dashboard design.

Shady politics and startup woes, however, severely hindered Tucker from keeping his new corporation from kicking off on time and in order. Inconsistent scrutiny and pressure from the Securities and Exchange Commission forced Preston Tucker into a corner, delaying much of the progresses needed to kick off production of his Tucker 48. From these delays, also came production and development setbacks. When the car first debuted, the media harshly criticized some of the original Tucker 48 prototypes for malfunctioning when instead, they were just incomplete.

Additionally, due to the pressure from the SEC and indictments from what were later found to be unsubstantiated and false allegations, more negative press gathered. And despite a full acquittal, the damage had been done and Tucker Corporation closed its doors.

Chris Chin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Since picking up his first MicroMachine, Chris Chin knew his passion for automobiles was embedded into his soul. Based in…
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
tesla robotaxi feud alef in transition flight

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
Buckle up, folks — this week we’re taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let’s bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities.
Even if you’re mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it’s become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we’re talking about this week’s public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump.
What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump’s election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about the driver-assist system's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow.
When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla.
It didn’t help that the Trump administration followed Musk’s recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis.
The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk’s companies, it’s unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it.
Back to the tech
Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology.
For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it’s the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators.
Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon’s upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech.
For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception.
Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo, or compete effectively with Zoox?
We’ll have to wait and see.
Flying cars
In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle.
What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey.
But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation’s Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby’s slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more... driveable.
Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the “car” back in “flying car.” This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it’s not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year.
On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It’s refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world.
But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer).
The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights.
While the $300,000 price tag won’t fit everyone’s budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don’t have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.

Read more
8 key things you need to know from Apple’s WWDC 2025 event
From a fresh look and updated names, to new features, more intelligence and live translation
iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS 26 shown on devices.

The WWDC 2025 keynote ran for just over an hour and a half. For those of you who don't fancy sitting through the whole presentation, we've pulled out the key things you need to know from the latest Apple event.

1. Welcome to the 26 club

Read more
Tesla’s robotaxi service is almost here, but it’s not the car you want to see
Silver Tesla Model Y Juniper side

Tesla chief Elon Musk has said that the automaker is aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, in Austin, Texas.

“Tentatively, June 22,” Musk said in a post on X on Tuesday, adding: “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.”

Read more