Skip to main content

How Volkswagen plans on putting a million electric cars on the road by 2025

Volkswagen is getting ready for life after the TDI scandal, AKA “dieselgate”.

The company isn’t giving up on the internal combustion engine, but it’s putting an unprecedented focus on electric mobility. That means developing an array of electric cars, while also investing in the infrastructure required to make battery-powered transportation plausible, desirable, and convenient for motorists.

Digital Trends sat down with Hinrich Woebcken, Volkswagen of America’s CEO and the head of the North America Region, and Christian Senger, the head of the brand’s e-mobility division, to gain insight on what we can expect from the upcoming electric car offensive.

Digital Trends: How will Volkswagen make the leap from relying almost solely on the internal combustion engine to all-electric transportation?

Christian Senger: I think we have quite a good story, a very convincing concept of how to make e-mobility a success. Driven by strict CO2 regulations and by our own ambition, we want to be the leader in e-mobility. We want to be the first company that produces more than a million electric cars, and for this to happen we need to offer really convincing solutions.

In our mind, the I.D. concept is the right answer for a volume manufacturer because it solves some of the core issues facing electric cars today. It offers enough range – from about 250 to 380 miles – and we’re shooting for an attractive price point. When it lands, it will cost about the same as a Golf TDI. Also, it will offer more than an electric drivetrain. It will be like a tablet on wheels. You’ll be able to install certain applications from third parties.

We have four core innovations: smart sustainability, automated driving, intuitive interaction, and personalized connectivity. We’ll enter the market in 2020, which is exactly when we predict e-mobility will accelerate and really evolve from a mere niche. The cost of batteries will have gone down, and the charging grid will have improved. Range anxiety won’t exist anymore and the cost issue will be taken care of so we’ll be able to serve new customer demands. This will signal a shift from a market driven by regulations to one driven by customer demand.

How flexible is the MEB platform?

It really is a modular platform. We can use it to build cars the size of the I.D. concept – maybe a little smaller, so about Polo-sized – up to Passat- and Tiguan-sized.  Bigger cars might even be possible because electric cars are much simpler.

How do you justify building EVs out of steel when weight is the big problem associated with electric drivetrains?

At Volkswagen, our core ambition is making e-mobility affordable. We need to do this on a global scale so we want to use our existing production facilities, and therefore we are mainly working with traditional material mixes; that means no carbon fiber, just intelligent lightweight construction.

How are you going to handle battery supply?

We’ll have a global source for batteries and we’re working together with suppliers. We will have the main volume in China, so we need to have facilities in China and also suppliers over there.

As you know there is a so-called white list in China, and only battery suppliers whose name shows up on that list are allowed to supply modules used in Chinese cars. Right now none of the big South Korean companies are on that list.

Have you selected the chemistry you’ll use?

For sure it’s lithium-ion. For us it’s the right choice, but we want a pack with more energy density.

What lessons have you learned from the e-Golf?

Electronic features added to cars over the past years and decades were accepted by regulators because they save lives.

The electric Golf has a super-complicated battery that’s integrated into the car. Even the modules, the total system, I’ve never seen anything like it before. On MEB-based cars we will have a simple box reserved for the battery that allows us to integrate any and all cell formats. There’s nothing we couldn’t use; we just have limitations when it comes to the actual modules like how high they are.

In terms of flexibility, simple packaging allows us to differentiate between markets, which gives us the opportunity to reduce costs by building cars that are less complex, and gives us more power when negotiating with our suppliers.

Is it feasible to have battery-swapping stations like Tesla experimented with not too long ago?

Commercially, we don’t think this is the way to go for many reasons. The battery is the heaviest part of a car, it has a huge structural role, so when it comes to crash-worthiness it needs to be fully integrated. Taking it out and putting it back in isn’t as simple as it sounds; we are not a toy company.

We are able to provide fast charging options, so if the battery isn’t fully empty we are coming closer and closer to charging times that rival fueling up a car with gasoline. The minimum time needed to fill your tank is maybe seven minutes – you fill up, you pay, and so on. With an EV, in just 20 minutes you can have enough juice in the battery for normal driving.

We’ll use a 400-volt standard for Volkswagen. It’s specified for up to 150 kilowatts of charging power, and we’re sure that at the very least we’ll be able to charge at 100 kilowatts. I’m sure you’re aware that Porsche is already looking into 800-volt charging stations.

We found that the most comfortable place to charge is at home, but also at work. However, we also found that customers show more interest in electric cars when they have good, accessible public fast-charging options. This represents about 10 percent of our potential customers. They’re motorists who can’t charge at home or at work so they need to have a strong network of public charging stations.

volkswagen id concept
Ronan Glon /Digital Trends
Ronan Glon /Digital Trends

Will other platforms like MQB and MLB use elements from the MEB?

We want to use economies of scale. MEB is definitely a platform for the whole corporation, not just Volkswagen, and there will be MEB-based cars out there built by other brands.

Previously we had a clear differentiation between MQB and MLB, and that was the direction of the engine. With an electric car this makes no difference. Realistically, nobody is going to install a longitudinal electric motor. The question now is, how do we cover the entire portfolio between SEAT and Porsche with minimal effort? We’re looking into it.

MEB cars will come standard with rear-wheel drive, and four-wheel drive will be available. That’s an interesting point; we have a strong front-wheel drive culture, and now we’re returning to rear-wheel drive and people ask “guys, what’s up?”

The battery is the heaviest part of an electric car, as I mentioned earlier, and there’s no better place for it than between the wheels. But now we can’t put 60 percent of the weight on the front axle. We’ll have a weight distribution of 53 percent on the rear axle, we can’t do better than that. And truthfully, there’s no need for four-wheel drive. It’s an additional feature we can offer, and we want to offer it, but there’s no real need for it. It’s an advantage.

How close is the I.D. concept to production?

Hinrich Woebcken: What you see here in Paris is only the first MEB-based car, and its debut is still four years away. From what I see and know within the company in regards to styling it’s pretty much what you’re going to see on the road. Of course we build concepts to get feedback.

The I.D. isn’t going to replace the Golf, right?

When it lands in four years’ time, the production version of the I.D. concept will cost about the same as a Golf TDI

In general, we will have parallels. There will be the new MEB cars, and in parallel we’ll sell cars powered by an internal combustion engine.  However, for the time being the e-Golf is planned only until the new MEBs arrive. Whether its career will be extended after that is something we haven’t decided yet.

Where does Volkswagen stand on autonomous driving?

We are going from semi-automated driving to fully-automated, but we’re not currently looking at building an autonomous car without a steering wheel or pedals. In automated driving you’ll always have the chance to interfere by grabbing the wheel, pushing the pedals, or whatever. That will come by 2025.

Are there still regulatory obstacles standing in the path of fully-automated vehicles?

I believe autonomous driving started 30 years ago with ABS. All electronic features added to cars over the past years and decades were accepted by regulators because they save lives.

Technology improves road safety. Automated driving is only the next step of a process that began three decades ago. It’s a big jump, but sensors are getting better and better. This technology is unstoppable; I believe it will arrive, the only question is how fast.

Not long ago many were skeptical about fully-automated driving, including members of the media. It’s fascinating to see what’s happened in the past three years.

We can say the same about electric cars, right?

The adoption of electric vehicles largely depends on the infrastructure. A lot of projects are currently going on. Volkswagen is investing $2 billion in electric mobility, infrastructure, and awareness programs in the United States. It’s a big investment, and I’m sure others will join us soon. I’m confident electric cars are at a tipping point.

We gave premium brands like Porsche and Audi an early start so that they can be on the market in 2018. MEB focuses on volume-oriented segments so we had to separate the two approaches because we needed more time.

Ronan Glon
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
tesla robotaxi feud alef in transition flight

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
Buckle up, folks — this week we’re taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let’s bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities.
Even if you’re mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it’s become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we’re talking about this week’s public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump.
What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump’s election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about the driver-assist system's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow.
When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla.
It didn’t help that the Trump administration followed Musk’s recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis.
The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk’s companies, it’s unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it.
Back to the tech
Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology.
For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it’s the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators.
Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon’s upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech.
For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception.
Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo, or compete effectively with Zoox?
We’ll have to wait and see.
Flying cars
In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle.
What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey.
But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation’s Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby’s slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more... driveable.
Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the “car” back in “flying car.” This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it’s not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year.
On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It’s refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world.
But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer).
The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights.
While the $300,000 price tag won’t fit everyone’s budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don’t have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.

Read more
8 key things you need to know from Apple’s WWDC 2025 event
From a fresh look and updated names, to new features, more intelligence and live translation
iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS 26 shown on devices.

The WWDC 2025 keynote ran for just over an hour and a half. For those of you who don't fancy sitting through the whole presentation, we've pulled out the key things you need to know from the latest Apple event.

1. Welcome to the 26 club

Read more
Tesla’s robotaxi service is almost here, but it’s not the car you want to see
Silver Tesla Model Y Juniper side

Tesla chief Elon Musk has said that the automaker is aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, in Austin, Texas.

“Tentatively, June 22,” Musk said in a post on X on Tuesday, adding: “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.”

Read more