Skip to main content

If you thought Windows 8 was bad, here are 6 operating systems that failed miserably

Over the years, we’ve used tons of different operating systems that have allowed us to get work done in a more efficient manner. But not every operating system that gets released is worthy of praise; many versions were buggy, slow, sluggish, and bloated to the point of embarrassment.

You might be able to think of one or two OSes off the top of your head that have given you headaches over the years, but there have actually been a handful of operating systems that just didn’t cut it – a few of which may surprise you. Here are some of the biggest OS blunders that you may remember, dating back all the way to the beginning of the GUI.

Windows 1.0 – 1985

Windows 1.0 was Microsoft’s first crack at a graphical user interface, and it went pretty badly. The company ended up abandoning the first beta version before eventually launching a buggy Windows 1.01 to the public.

Windows 1.0
Image used with permission by copyright holder

MS-DOS 4.0 – 1988

MS-DOS was an excellent OS for its time, but Microsoft kept working on it and fixed what wasn’t broken. The company released MS-DOS 4.0 to replace version 3.3, but users quickly reverted back after programs kept crashing and computers kept freezing, thanks to poorly-coded memory addressing.

MS-DOS 4.0
Image used with permission by copyright holder

JavaOS – 1996

Sun and IBM teamed up to create JavaOS for use with embedded systems, but it was a pretty bad idea from the start. The Java language was pretty sluggish to begin with back then, and development of the OS ended abruptly after just three years. However, open-source developers kept it going with other Java-based OSes like Jnode (pictured below) and JX.

Jnode
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Windows ME – 2000

After Windows 2000 was released, Microsoft felt compelled – for some reason – to release another Windows version later that same year, called Windows ME (Millennium Edition). However, it ended up being buggy, slow, and unstable. It was so bad that Microsoft only sold it for a year before pulling the plug.

Windows ME
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Lindows – 2001

It seemed like a genius idea: a Linux OS that could run Windows apps. It sounded great on paper, but it turned out to be a disaster – only lasting a few months before the project was abandoned. To add insult to injury, Lindows was sued by Microsoft because the company claimed the name violated the Windows trademark. The Redmond-based company ended up buying the Lindows name.

Lindows
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Windows Vista – 2006

Microsoft’s latest flop was Windows Vista, and it’s sometimes humorously known as the second version of Windows ME. Vista was the first OS to implement the same desktop UI design that Windows uses today. However, Vista ended up being extremely slow and sluggish, with numerous hardware compatibility issues, forcing many users to downgrade back to the safe haven that was Windows XP, until Windows 7 came along.

Windows Vista
Image used with permission by copyright holder

That’s our list of operating systems that we could’ve lived without. Do you have any others to add to the list? Let us know in the comments below!

Craig Lloyd
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Craig Lloyd is a freelance writer who's been writing and blogging since 2008. His love for technology goes back even further…
No, a lifetime VPN subscription doesn’t mean ‘your’ lifetime
iPhone with VPN service enabled in hand over a blurred background

Folks who signed up for al lifetime subscription with VPN provider VPNSecure have been discovering the true definition of “lifetime” when it comes to such deals. And it’s not the one they'd hoped to hear.

After new owners took over the company, these particular customers recently had their lifetime subscriptions canceled. The new operator of VPNSecure told them that it didn’t know about the lifetime deals when they acquired the business, adding that it was unable to honor them.

Read more
SanDisk’s latest drive sets new benchmark for consumer NVMe SSDs
The SanDisk WD Black SN8100 PCIe Gen 5 SSD with and without heatsink variants

SanDisk has officially introduced the WD Black SN8100, its latest high-end PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD targeting PC enthusiasts, gamers, and professional users. With sequential read speeds of up to 14,900 MB/s and write speeds of 14,000 MB/s, the drive sets a new bar for consumer SSD performance, surpassing some of the best NVMe SSDs currently on the market, including the Crucial T705. 

The SN8100 uses a standard M.2 2280 form factor and is available in capacities of 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, and 8TB. It’s worth noting that the 1TB model offers lower write speeds, up to 11,000 MB/s, compared to the higher-capacity versions, which reach up to 14,000 MB/s. 

Read more
Pairing the RTX 5090 with a CPU from 2006? Nvidia said ‘hold my beer’
RTX 5090.

Nvidia's best graphics cards are often paired with expensive CPUs, but what if you want to try a completely mismatched, retro configuration? Well, that used to be impossible due to driver issues. But, for whatever reason, Nvidia has just removed the instruction that prevented you from doing so, opening the door to some fun, albeit nonsensical, CPU and GPU combinations.

The instruction in question is called POPCNT (Population Count), and this is a CPU instruction that also prevents Windows 11 from being installed on older hardware. Its job is counting how many bits are present in a binary number. However, as spotted by TheBobPony on X (Twitter), POPCNT will not be a problem for Nvidia's latest graphics cards anymore.

Read more