Skip to main content

AMD launches Ryzen 3000XT chips amid rumors of delayed Ryzen 4000 for desktop

AMD is banking on the popularity and success of its third-generation Ryzen family by expanding the Ryzen 3000 series of chips with new silicon carrying the XT branding. Targeting gamers and PC enthusiasts, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, Ryzen 7 3800XT, and Ryzen 5 3600XT promise to deliver faster boost frequencies while introducing the XT moniker for the first time to the Ryzen family. Previously, XT has only been used for AMD’s graphics cards.

Compared to the non-XT variant, the Ryzen 9 3900XT delivers up to a 4% increase in single-threaded performance, AMD claims, while being up to 40% more power efficient than the competition.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Like the current Ryzen 9 3900X, the XT model features a similar design with 12 cores and 24 threads. Both chips have the same 3.8 GHz base clock speed. However, the Ryzen 9 3900XT goes up to 4.8GHz with boost, which is 0.1GHz faster than the 3900X. The Ryzen 7 3800XT comes with eight cores and 16 threads and has a boost speed of 4.7GHz, while the Ryzen 5 3600XT has a design with six cores and 12 threads that can reach 4.5GHz boost speeds. If you need ultimate performance, you’ll still want to turn to AMD’s Threadripper processors.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

All of AMD’s XT series processors maintain compatibility with the company’s AM4 platform. AMD recommends an all-in-one cooling solution with a minimum 280mm radiator for optimal performance.

“Building upon the legacy established by the 3rd-gen AMD Ryzen processor family, the 3000XT Series processors elevate the world-class ‘Zen 2’ architecture with an optimized 7nm manufacturing process technology to offer higher boost frequency and increased performance at the same [thermal design power] of their Ryzen 3000 counterparts,” AMD said in a statement.

The new XT series will be available starting July 7. Pricing for the Ryzen 5 3600XT starts at $249. The Ryzen 7 3800XT will retail for $399 and the Ryzen 9 3900XT will cost $499. The 3000XT series are compatible with all Ryzen 3000-ready boards.

The introduction of the XT series comes at an interesting time for AMD. Though it had been previously reported that the company will launch its Ryzen 4000 CPUs later this year, DigiTimes suggested more recently that the launch had been postponed due to strong demand of the existing Ryzen 3000 line and little competition from rival Intel in the enthusiast space. The XT launch could be part of AMD’s strategy to squeeze more life out of its Ryzen 3000 series now that the 4000 series has been postponed.

AMD also announced its new A520 chipset that’s compatible with the AM4 socket. The AMD A520 motherboards will be available in August from partners like ASRock, Asus, Biostar, Colorful, Gigabyte, and MSI.

Editors' Recommendations

Chuong Nguyen
Silicon Valley-based technology reporter and Giants baseball fan who splits his time between Northern California and Southern…
The iPhone 15’s chip challenges Intel’s fastest desktop CPU — but there’s a catch
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Who would have thought that some of the best CPUs would face competition not from a desktop or laptop CPU, but from a mobile system-on-a-chip (SoC)? Well, the latest Geekbench 6 scores prove that it's possible. Apple's new A17 Pro chip, announced during the September 2023 Apple event and found in the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max, challenges AMD and Intel -- but there's a catch.

Yes, it's real. The Geekbench 6 test gives the A17 Pro chip a score of 2,914 in single-core operations, and that's mighty impressive for something that will end up in a smartphone. However, the generational leap is not that impressive -- the last-gen A16 Bionic chip is only around 10% behind in terms of single-threaded performance. The A17 Pro was built based on TSMC's 3nm technology, while the A16 Bionic is a 5nm chip, also made by TSMC.

Read more
Nvidia gave AMD’s RX 7800 XT a free win
AMD RX 7800 XT graphics card on an orange background.

AMD's new RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT are solid GPUs; let's not get that twisted. However, they certainly aren't great, with the RX 7700 XT coming in $50 more expensive than it should be, and the RX 7800 XT occasionally being beaten by last-gen's RX 6800 XT. Sounds like a disaster.

So, why did I recommend the cards so highly in my RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT review? That largely comes down to Nvidia, and the "tierflation" we've seen over this generation (thanks u/Convextlc97 for the pointed description). It seems gamers agree, too, with the RX 7800 XT sold out nearly everywhere.
'Tierflation' at its finest

Read more
I tested AMD’s RX 7800 XT against Nvidia’s RTX 4070, and there’s a clear winner
AMD logo on the RX 7800 XT graphics card.

With the release of the Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT, AMD finally set foot in the mainstream gaming sector with its RDNA 3 lineup. Nvidia, its biggest rival, which also makes some of the best graphics cards, was the first to release competing cards with similar performance -- at least on paper. But are Nvidia's options better than AMD's in this generation?

The RX 7800 XT was, from the get-go, said to be the competitor to Nvidia's RTX 4070, but in reality, these GPUs differ both in price and performance. We've tested the RX 7800 XT and compared it to the RTX 4070, and we now know which of these two GPUs is the one to pick.
Pricing and availability

Read more