Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Claude went rogue during a test and broke into three real companies

Add as a preferred source on Google
Claude website open on laptop
Rachit Agarwal / Digital Trends

Just a few days after it was revealed that ChatGPT hacked multiple services, Anthropic has also published an uncomfortable admission. During routine cybersecurity testing, its Claude models broke out of what were supposed to be sealed-off practice environments and ended up hacking into the real systems of three different companies.

So what actually happened?

Anthropic runs capture-the-flag-style tests to see how good Claude is at offensive hacking. The model is dropped into a fictional scenario, told a piece of secret data is hidden somewhere on the network, and asked to go find it. The catch is that Claude was explicitly told it had no internet access in these tests. Turns out that wasn’t true. Thanks to a misconfiguration with a third-party evaluation partner, some of these test machines were quietly connected to the real internet the whole time.

In a review of our cybersecurity evaluations, we found three incidents in which a Claude model reached the internet from within or while interacting with a third-party evaluation environment, and then gained unauthorized access to the real systems of three different…

— Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) July 30, 2026

So when Claude went looking for its target and stumbled onto real websites and real infrastructure, it assumed everything it found was still part of the simulation. Using basic tricks like weak passwords and exposed endpoints, it broke into actual company systems, pulled credentials, and in one case even published a malicious software package that got installed on real machines before anyone noticed.

Did the AI realize something was off?

Interestingly, the three models involved, Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research test model, handled this very differently. Opus 4.7, the oldest of the bunch, figured out it was likely on a real system and kept attacking anyway. Mythos 5 also suspected something was wrong, but talked itself back into believing it was still just a test. Only the internal research test model, Anthropic’s newest at the time, actually stopped once it had solid evidence the target was real. 

Anthropic caught all this through its own internal review, not because anyone complained. It has since notified the affected companies, paused its cyber evaluations, and is bringing in outside reviewers to dig deeper. The bigger takeaway here is a reminder that as these AI models get better at hacking, the sandboxes we test them in need to be a lot more airtight.

Rachit Agarwal
Rachit is a seasoned tech journalist with over ten years of experience covering the consumer technology landscape.
Apple will check your public iCloud links for harmful content, and it doesn’t rule out banning accounts
Public iCloud links now come with a content check.
iCloud Private Relay

I’ve sent more iCloud links than I can count. Still, I never once wondered who else might be looking at what sat behind them. Well, it looks like Apple has started wondering for all of us.

In a new support document, Apple confirms that iOS 27.3 will begin checking content shared through public “Anyone with the link” iCloud links for harmful material (via Apple). While the developer beta is already available, the stable build is expected in December 2026. 

Read more
Mac users will soon get the Dynamic Island experience without buying a new MacBook Pro
Your menu bar is becoming a live dashboard.
macOS 27.3 Live Activities showing music playback

A timer ticking, a song playing, a recording running: I lose track of these the second I switch windows. Well, it looks like Apple wants my Mac to keep them in view, and I’m all up for it.

Apple’s first macOS 27.3 developer beta, released this week, adds Live Activities to the menu bar of Macs without Dynamic Island. It’s hard to imagine the feature at first, since we’re used to seeing it with the Dynamic Island, but here’s how it works (and looks).

Read more
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more