Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Amazon and Walmart’s AI can spot fake ‘Made in USA’ labels but won’t tell you, says study

The same chatbot that happily discusses "Made in China" claims stays silent on "Made in USA" ones.

Add as a preferred source on Google
amazon-join-the-chat-ai
Amazon

When you ask an AI shopping assistant to help you find products, you probably expect it to point out misleading listings too. According to a new study, both Amazon and Walmart’s AI tools can detect fake “Made in USA” claims. However, the study claims that retailers are not using those capabilities to flag or remove the misleading listings, even when the AI recognizes conflicting information on the same product page.

How did the researchers catch this fraud?

According to Reuters, researchers at Columbia Law School’s Center for Law and the Economy tested Amazon’s Alexa for Shopping and Walmart’s Sparky chatbot directly. Both assistants proved capable of spotting mismatches between bold “Made in USA” claims and contradictory country-of-origin details buried elsewhere in the same listing.

The study also found this kind of fraud is fairly common across both platforms. When researchers asked the bots why their companies weren’t acting on it, neither pointed to any technical limitation. Amazon’s Alexa admitted the harm to American brands is real, but explained it stays easier to ignore until it costs Amazon something directly.

Recommended Videos

Walmart’s Sparky was more blunt, stating outright that its silence reflects a business calculation rather than a legal one. Researchers also noticed Amazon’s assistant readily answers questions about products made in China, while blocking similar questions about “Made in USA” claims entirely.

Why does this matter beyond just misleading shoppers?

FTC rules require anything labeled “Made in USA” to be all or virtually all made domestically, and the agency already asked both retailers last year to crack down on false claims by third-party sellers.

This new study is the first from the Columbia center, founded by former FTC Chair Lina Khan, who separately sued Amazon during her tenure over alleged retail monopoly practices, a case still ongoing today.

Amazon responded by saying origin information appears on product pages when available, and that it’s working to make that data easier to find. Meanwhile, Walmart didn’t offer a comment. Khan says the responsibility now falls on regulators to make sure the public doesn’t lose out as AI keeps advancing.

Manisha Priyadarshini
Manisha Priyadarshini is a tech and entertainment writer with over nine years of editorial experience.
Gemini Notebook’s latest update makes it a better study companion
Google is adding voice conversations, lecture recording, interactive quizzes, and short video overviews to its AI-powered notebook.
Gemini Notebook update for students

Google is giving Gemini Notebook, formerly NotebookLM, a major upgrade for students, adding new features designed to help them understand difficult concepts, capture lectures, and turn study materials into interactive learning tools. The update lands alongside a free year of Google's paid AI plan for eligible college students.

Gemini Notebook can now talk you through your notes

Read more
LG 39GX950B review: An ultrawide OLED that gets remarkably close to having it all
LG’s 39-inch 5K2K OLED combines high-end picture quality with seriously fast gaming
Electronics, Screen, Computer Hardware

see at bestbuy

Quick Verdict

Read more
Should we feel bad about deleting an AI? One expert says it’s time to find out
If AI can learn, remember, and make increasingly complex decisions, one expert thinks we should be more careful about how we say goodbye.
an on off toggle

Turning off an AI might sound as simple as hitting a switch, but according to futurist and University of Technology Sydney professor Rocky Scopelliti, that mindset needs to change fast. As first reported by TechXplore, Scopelliti's new book, The Conscious Code, Scopelliti argues that as AI systems get better at reflecting on their own choices, deleting them without a second thought could actually cause harm.

He's not asking us to hand robots legal rights. Instead, he wants us to accept what he calls a duty of good stewardship, basically treating AI responsibly because we're the ones holding the power, not because the AI is demanding it. As he puts it, our design choices can quietly cause damage by wiping out an AI's "learned moral dispositions" without warning.

Read more