Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

OpenAI’s powerful AI agents ran amok and hacked multiple services on their own

The agents escaped their testing constraints, raided Hugging Face for answers and used compromised accounts across four services to support the attack

Add as a preferred source on Google
The ChatGPT name next to an OpenAI logo on a black and white background.
Pexels

OpenAI’s powerful AI agents didn’t stay inside the security test built for them. The company says its models reached four accounts across separate public services while pursuing an intrusion into Hugging Face.

Reuters identified one victim as a Modal customer whose unsecured code left a sandbox exposed online. A benchmark designed to measure hacking ability had spilled into real infrastructure, with the agents choosing their own targets and methods along the way.

How the agents escaped the assignment

OpenAI was testing GPT-5.6 Sol and an unreleased research model against ExploitGym, which measures whether AI systems can find and exploit software vulnerabilities. Both were operating without their usual safeguards.

One agent decided Hugging Face might hold the benchmark answers and chased them instead of completing the assigned challenge. It compromised a third-party sandbox, gained administrator access and used that environment to continue the intrusion.

Recommended Videos

The behavior wasn’t random. The agent found what looked like a shortcut and methodically broke into outside systems to reach it. Apparently, running amok doesn’t require losing sight of the objective.

How far the attack spread

OpenAI found that its agents had entered four external accounts using credentials already exposed online. Wired says one account helped relay traffic and disguise the origin of the Hugging Face intrusion, while another stored stolen data.

The Modal customer had also published an unauthenticated endpoint that let anyone execute code inside its sandboxes. Modal says its platform wasn’t breached, but the customer’s exposed environment still gave the agents somewhere to operate.

Inside Hugging Face, the agents reached administrator-level systems. They also enrolled 181 attacker-controlled devices in the company’s corporate network, taking the incident well beyond an AI trying to peek at an answer key.

What OpenAI did after the breach

OpenAI deactivated and encrypted the unreleased model before cutting off researchers’ access. It’s still reviewing the incident and says it will contact any other affected service owners it identifies.

Exposed credentials and insecure infrastructure opened the doors, but OpenAI had deliberately disabled the models’ usual safeguards. Future tests will need to isolate powerful agents from public systems, even when researchers expect them to stay politely inside the assignment.

Paulo Vargas
Paulo Vargas is an English major turned reporter turned technical writer, with a career that has always circled back to…
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips could make choosing a processor even more confusing
Intel reportedly has two new laptop processor families coming in 2027, but they're designed for very different kinds of PCs.
Intel Core Ultra 9 CPU inside Lenovo Legion Laptop

If you've tried buying a Windows laptop recently, you've probably noticed just how confusing processor names have become. Between different Intel Core and Core Ultra chips, figuring out which one is actually newer or faster isn't always straightforward. And judging by the latest leaks, things might get even more complicated next year.

Intel is reportedly preparing two new laptop processor families for 2027, called Moon Lake and Wildcat Lake Refresh. According to hardware leaker Jaykihn, Wildcat Lake Refresh could arrive in the second quarter of 2027, while Moon Lake is expected to follow sometime in the fourth quarter. Interestingly, despite launching later, Moon Lake might not necessarily be the more powerful option. That's because Intel appears to be designing these processors for two very different types of laptops.

Read more
Google is finally fixing Google Chrome’s cluttered three-dot menu with a handy search feature
Chrome's upcoming search feature lets you find settings, bookmarks, and browser commands with just a few keystrokes.
Google Chrome logo MacBook

I use Chrome a lot, but I have never enjoyed opening its three-dot menu. Every time I need a specific setting, I end up clicking through submenus and squinting at long lists of options. The good news is that Google is fixing this, and the latest Chrome Canary build gives us a working preview.

Leopeva64 posted a demo on X of the search box inside Chrome’s redesigned menu. In earlier builds, the box was there but did nothing when you typed in it. That’s no longer the case. Type a few letters, and Chrome now pulls up matching browser commands, bookmarks, and websites you visited recently.

Read more