Skip to main content

This guy’s experience with Comcast was so bad, he’s selling his house

comcast pledges better customer service 20 credit hires 5500 reps van
Image used with permission by copyright holder
It’s no secret that dealing with Comcast’s customer service can be a little tricky. From rude name changes on bills, to refusals to cancel service, and even cashing a check that was mistakenly sent to them, there’s a lot that can go wrong when you’re dealing with the massive service provider. Even taking into account their less-than-stellar track record, one potential customer has had so many problems that it looks like he’s going to have to sell the house he just bought three months ago.

The story starts around the end of 2014, when Seth Morabito bought his first home in Kitsap County, Washington. Morabito is a programmer who works from home, so on the short list of needs for a house was consistent access to broadband Internet. Before purchasing the house, he called both Comcast Business and Xfinity to ensure he could get the connection he needed to get his work done without issues. Both companies told him it wouldn’t be an issue, and even mentioned that a previous tenant had Comcast service before, so the setup would be easy. At the end of January, ready to take up residence in his first home, Morabito scheduled Xfinity to come out and hook up his cable, but that’s where the trouble started.

Recommended Videos

The first tech to arrive noted that what appeared to be a cable box on the side of the home was actually for a satellite connection, the dish for which had been taken down long ago. The tech put in a request to have a new line run from the road to the house, and then left. What followed was an almost comedic — if it wasn’t so tragic — train of installation techs who had no idea what was going on, apologetic customer service reps that didn’t manage to help at all, and quotes in the $50,000-$60,000 range to get Internet running to the house. Eventually, he was told outright that Comcast wouldn’t be providing service to his home. They wouldn’t pay for it, they wouldn’t let him pay for it, and there wouldn’t be any more consideration. If you want to see the exact dates and conversations, he presented his records of the process on his site, along with some answers to questions a lot of people have already asked.

Having exhausted his options, Morabito is faced with selling his brand new home. With only three months of equity on the home, chances are selling it would result in a loss after fees and taxes, plus the time and money spent on finding a new home and moving into it. It’s a cost he’d surely wish he could pass on to Comcast, although it isn’t clear if he has any sort of recourse. Users in the comments on his blog have suggested that next time he get a contract ahead of time that ensures he’ll have access to Internet, or he can back out of the sale. It takes the risk off for next time, but it may be too late to save his first home, which he said “met all of our criteria, and more” complete with a “lovely secluded view of trees, a nice kitchen, and a great home office with a separate entrance.”

He doesn’t mince words when it comes to the experience, stating simply that “throughout this process, Comcast has lied. I don’t throw that word around lightly or flippantly, I mean it sincerely. They’ve fed me false information from the start, and it’s hurt me very badly.” It certainly isn’t the first time Comcast has lied to tried and bring in a new customer, or keep one from leaving, but in this case it has a far more serious consequence than hurt feelings. Morabito still isn’t quite sure how to resolve the situation, but for now he’s relying on an expensive Verizon hotspot with a bandwidth cap that’s too low to get his work done, opting instead for the Wi-Fi at his local Starbucks when he needs to make a big transfer. Hopefully the attention he’s receiving on his post will convince Comcast to take a look at their recently revised customer service standards to figure out whether it actually made a difference.

Brad Bourque
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
New 9800X3D leak: ‘Strong generational boost in games’ is just 8%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

AMD's best processor for gaming is right around the corner. Through various leaked benchmarks, we've already learned that it might disappoint, and today's leak only serves to confirm that. According to leaked AMD data, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D may offer a subtle improvement in gaming -- although it'll still be better than what most of the Zen 5 lineup has been able to provide.

VideoCardz was able to obtain what appears to be an official marketing description of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. The blurb reveals things like the predicted improvement in instructions per cycle (IPC), gaming, and multi-threaded workloads. It looks like the real deal, but as with any other leak, it's important to remember that we'll only learn the full story once we test the CPU ourselves.

Read more
M4 chip: here’s everything we know about Apple’s latest silicon
Apple introducing the new M4 chip.

Apple is on the cusp of announcing new Macs equipped with its latest M4 chip, bringing more powerful performance and extra features to its computers. But this won't be the first time the M4 has made an appearance -- it's already out in the latest iPad Pro.

But is the M4 chip any good? Should you upgrade your Mac or iPad to take advantage of it? And what new features will it bring to your devices? We've set out to answer these questions and more, blending together what we've learned from the M4 iPad Pro and information that has been leaked ahead of the M4 Macs launching this year. That should give you everything you need to know about Apple's latest chip.
Price and release date

Read more
Why you may want to avoid the latest Nvidia driver release
A screenshot of the Nvidia app.

Nvidia’s latest GeForce 566.03 WHQL driver update was released two days ago, and the company has now acknowledged a peculiar issue. According to a report by Overclock3D, users of Corsair’s iCUE software and Bluestacks, may face “higher than normal CPU usage” and are advised not to update to the latest graphics driver update.

Corsair's iCUE software integrates the company’s compatible hardware into a single interface, enabling users to control RGB lighting, adjust fan speeds, create macros, and monitor system performance. Bluestacks, on the other hand, is an Android emulator for Windows, primarily used for gaming and app development.

Read more