Skip to main content

U.S. government remains committed to its fight to gain access to overseas data

microsoft sues us government gag orders 2
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Privacy remains one of the more bitterly debated aspects of technology — and not just in terms of criminals gaining access to personal or proprietary business information using nefarious means. Increasingly, the question of government access to the same information has become a controversial issue, and Microsoft has been spearheading a fight with the U.S. government over access to information stored on servers located in other countries.

In July 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that while the Stored Communications Act does indeed allow the U.S. government to demand access to information stored on servers located on U.S. soil, information stored on servers overseas is off limits without going through the relevant local legal process. Nevertheless, the U.S. government hasn’t given up on its fight to gain access to that data, and asked the appellate court on Thursday to reconsider its decision, as Ars Technica reports.

Microsoft’s argument remains the same as it was preceding July’s ruling — every Microsoft customer has the right to be protected by local laws rather than those of a foreign government, such as in the case of the Dublin, Ireland, servers that were the subject of the previous ruling. The appellate court noted that at least in the case at hand, a method already exists to compel the release of information using local laws. The Mutual Legal Assistant Treaty allows the U.S. government to request and receive local warrants applicable to Microsoft subsidiaries located in Ireland.

The U.S. government argues, however, that national interests are at stak,e and that Microsoft, as a for-profit private company, should not be allowed to represent its clients in terms of these sorts of privacy issues. As the government stated in its request for reconsideration, “It cannot be true that the ‘focus’ of the statutory provision is privacy, but the protection of that privacy interest rests entirely on the profit-driven decisions of a private business, with no choice by or consultation with the owner of the account and the beneficiary of the privacy interest.”

Putting things even more strongly, the government said, “The Opinion has created a regime where electronic communication service providers — private, for-profit businesses answerable only to their shareholders — can thwart legitimate and important criminal and national security investigations, while providing no offsetting, principled privacy protections.” Of course, Microsoft disagrees with the government’s position and isn’t backing down — a move that’s being monitored by a vast array of companies that could be impacted by the decision and that are largely supporting Microsft’s efforts.

If the appeals court refuses to rehear the case, then the government would likely be inclined to take the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. When that decision will be made remains up in the air, because the appellate court has not indicated when it will consider the government’s request.

Mark Coppock
Mark has been a geek since MS-DOS gave way to Windows and the PalmPilot was a thing. He’s translated his love for…
The best all-in-one printers you can buy in 2024
Canon's imageClass MF753Cdw has a quick, full-duplex ADF.

If you're shopping for the best printers for a home office, an all-in-one is a good choice. Multifunction printers include scanners to digitize receipts, invoices, and other documents. The scan and print functions combine to make copies. Some all-in-one printers can connect to a phone line to act like a fax machine.

Multifunction printers are like the smaller cousins of the bulkier copiers you might see at the office. As our printer buyers' guide points out, an all-in-one printer usually costs less than it would to buy a printer and scanner separately. Here are some of the best multifunction printers on the market today.

Read more
Asus pits AMD’s performance against Intel’s efficiency
Asus ProArt PX13 front view showing display and keyboard.

Several new laptops chipsets have been introduced lately in response to Microsoft's Copilot+ PC AI initiative. They sport faster neural processing units (NPUs) to speed up on-device AI processing and make it more efficient, but they're not precisely the same. AMD's Ryzen AI 9 chipsets are aimed at overall performance, while Intel's Lunar Lake is aimed at efficiency.

The Asus ProArt PX13 is one of the first with AMD's chipset, and it's a highly portable 13-inch laptop. The Asus Zenbook S 14 is aimed at great battery life in a thin-and-light design using Lunar Lake. Both are some of the best laptops you can buy today, but which laptop is the better choice?
Specs and configurations

Read more
Nvidia might finally fix its VRAM problem — but it will take time
The Razer Blade 14 and 18 on a table.

It's no secret that some of Nvidia's best graphics cards could use a little more VRAM. According to a new leak, Nvidia may be addressing that problem in a big way -- at least in laptops. The RTX 5090 laptop GPU is now reported to come with 24GB VRAM across a 256-bit memory bus. The downside? These new laptops might not make it to market as soon as we'd hoped.

The information comes from Moore's Law Is Dead, who cites his own industry sources as he spills the beans on RTX 50-series laptop specs. Up until now, we've not heard much about Nvidia's plans for RTX 50 laptops, indicating that they might be a few months away. The YouTuber agrees with this, saying that Nvidia might be targeting a launch window in the first or second quarter of 2025. This might not affect the entire lineup, though.

Read more