Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Features
  4. News

What Microsoft can learn from Apple’s Mac on ARM transition

By
Promotional logo for WWDC 2023.
This story is part of our complete Apple WWDC coverage

Microsoft has tried to transition toward ARM chips multiple times in the past 10 years. All of them have been failed attempts.

But at Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday, Apple announced its own plans to switch away from using Intel processors to its own custom ARM-based chips, starting later this year. But in Apple’s case, it just might work.

Related

Appearing decisive and planned-out, Apple tackled everything from app compatibility to performance, explaining how ARM Macs would benefit both developers and consumers. If Microsoft ever wants to achieve something similar, it should start taking notes.

Developers, developers, developers

Image used with permission by copyright holder

iPads, Windows laptops, and iMac Pros would be nothing without third-party developers. They code the apps you use and the games you play. That’s why, when switching system architecture, a company needs to listen to what developers have to say. Any kind of transition requires development effort, and these developers will require convincing.

You can’t say Microsoft hasn’t tried. From Visual Studio, the developer-friendly community, GitHub, and even the Windows Insider Program, Microsoft has plenty of dedicated tools for its developers. Microsoft even introduced Project Reunion, to help developers code better apps. But its attempts to unify its platform for developers have always fell flat.

Whether it was through forcing unwilling developers in the Windows 8 era or refusing to pick a side ever since, Microsoft’s transition to ARM has always tripped over developer support. Windows developers need to code separate 32-bit apps for ARM devices like the Surface Pro X and other Always Connected PCs. This is because Windows 10 on ARM isn’t optimized for more popular 64-bit apps. It’s also why some apps and peripherals simply don’t work on these devices.

That’s why Microsoft has had to lean heavily on emulation of 32-bit desktop apps as way around this. As emulation often does, it results in performance issues — even in common apps like Google Chrome. Google’s in the same boat with its Chrome OS support for Android apps.

The lack of native apps has always been the missing puzzle piece, and that’s what makes Apple’s approach stand out.

Picking a side

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Apple didn’t lead its transition announcement with emulation. It was all about convincing developers to make native apps. It starts with Apple’s Universal App Quick Start Program. Although not free, it gives developers the tools they need to move over to ARM in just a matter of days — at least, according to Apple.

The program provides access to documentation, the forums, and support beta versions of MacOS Big Sur and Xcode 12. Xcode 12 includes tools like Universal 2, an application binary that supports both Intel and Apple Silicon systems. It’s not forcing developers to make bets about where Apple’s support is.

There is even a Developer Transition Kit (DTK) which is providing developers with a sample Mac Mini with the A12Z Bionic SoC to code their apps on before the public gets to it.

Apple also has its own emulation, too, but only as a backup solution. Thanks to “Rosetta 2” users will be able to run existing Mac apps that have not yet been updated, including those with plug-ins. The performance is still unknown, but there’s no rush here. Smaller applications that people rely on won’t just refuse to run. That’s important, especially since Intel-powered Macs have been around for 15 years (and will continue in the future).

But there’s no question where Apple’s support is. Native apps running on ARM-powered Macs in the goal. It even has Mac Catalyst to try and flood the Mac App Store with more native applications, despite being ports of iPad apps.

Time to ruffle some feathers

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Microsoft’s long-standing strategy to try and support both legacy and modern applications has left the ecosystem divided and weakened. Windows 10X should be Microsoft’s own attempt to modernize, but Microsoft has again conceded to play to both sides. It doesn’t want to upset Intel, its hardware partners, or its legacy developer community.

But it can’t go on like this forever. Eventually, Microsoft will need to pick a direction and move forward. If it’s still wondering how to accomplish that, Apple just showed the way.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Arif Bacchus
Arif Bacchus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Arif Bacchus is a native New Yorker and a fan of all things technology. Arif works as a freelance writer at Digital Trends…
The biggest threat to the MacBook this year might come from Apple itself
The MacBook Air on a white table.

MacBooks have held a dominant position in the laptop world for the past few years. Though there have been meaningful rivals from the Windows side of the aisle, the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro still feel like they hold an unshakeable lead at the moment.

But according to the latest reports, the most serious challenger to the MacBook's reign won't come from Windows -- it'll come from within Apple in the form of some very advanced new iPads.
What's a computer?

Read more
The case for buying the M2 MacBook Air over the M3 model
The screen of the MacBook Air M2.

Apple's MacBook Air M2 recently stood at the top of our list of best laptops, and for good reason. It's incredibly well-built, exuding an elegance that few laptops can match. It's also plenty fast for productivity users, and its GPU is optimized for creators. Its keyboard, touchpad, and display are all top-notch.

Enter the MacBook Air M3, which (hint) took over the MacBook Air's place on that list. The upgraded chipset offers even faster performance, particularly in GPU-intensive apps, and the M3 model supports an additional external display (with the display closed). It's $100 more, but is that uptick in price justified? Let's dig in.
Specs and configurations

Read more
Why you should buy a MacBook Pro instead of a MacBook Air
The 14-inch MacBook Pro on a window sill.

There are plenty of reasons to buy a MacBook Air instead of a MacBook Pro. If you want a MacBook on a budget, you don't necessarily need the goodies that come with upgrading to the MacBook Pro.

That being said, I'm going to argue for spending a little more. In my experience, the MacBook Pro offers several distinct advantages that help justify a higher price, especially with the introduction of the more affordable MacBook Pro 14 with the base M3. If you can stretch your budget a bit, here's why I think you should buy a MacBook Pro instead of a MacBook Air.
Setting the stage: pricing

Read more