Skip to main content

For the first time in 14 years, AMD beats Intel in PassMark desktop market share

 

Intel briefly fell behind AMD in the desktop CPU market share, according to new data from the benchmarking firm, PassMark. AMD at one point had a near 1.6% lead over its rival Intel in total analyzed systems before the AMD lead fell to a near 0.4% gain for Intel a day later.

Recommended Videos

According to the data, at one point, on January 4, AMD’s share in PassMark’s benchmarking tests was at 50.08%, whereas, Intel’s was standing at 49.2%. The numbers have since switched back to favor Intel, with the chipmaker standing above at a 50.2% lead over AMD’s 49.8% at the time of publishing on January 5.

AMD CEO Lisa Ku
AMD CEO Lisa Ku AMD

These numbers don’t truly represent the full scope of the market, as it only analyzes “thousands” of PerformanceTest benchmarks on Windows PCs, but it does show that AMD is making gains over Intel in the desktop space with its latest lineup of Ryzen processors. According to the numbers, it’s been 14 years since AMD last achieved the feat of beating Intel, even for a brief moment.

At this same point in 2019, the lead was much bigger for Intel in PassMark’s data, as Intel held a 57.4% share over AMD’s 42%, but that now has shrunk significantly with today’s data. Even in Steam’s annual hardware survey, November 2020 numbers showed that AMD was chipping away at Intel’s share in the CPU space on the game service. The last time AMD had a large lead over Intel in the desktop space came in the first quarter of 2006, according to TechSpot.

As we noted, in the desktop space, AMD’s current best CPU, the Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X, beat anything Intel has to offer, clocking in with 12 and 16 cores. Intel, though, could make even more gains over AMD with its 11th-gen desktop processors, which could be coming in early 2021. The new Intel processors promise frequency changes and faster clock speeds.

In the laptop space, though, Intel still holds strong. According to the PassMark Data, AMD holds only a 17% share of analyzed laptops, whereas Intel has a commanding 83% lead. AMD is still ahead in chipset technology, as its latest Ryzen laptop chips are built on the 7nm transistors, whereas Intel’s Tiger Lake and Ice Lake chips are still stuck on the 10nm transistors. In the desktop space, meanwhile, AMD is working on 5nm Zen 4 chips, whereas Intel is still on 14nm.

Arif Bacchus
Arif Bacchus is a native New Yorker and a fan of all things technology. Arif works as a freelance writer at Digital Trends…
I tested Intel’s XeSS against AMD FSR — and the results speak for themselves
Intel Arc demo: Ryan Shrout plays Shadow of the Tomb Raider on a gaming PC.

AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) and Intel's Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) are two of the most prominent upscaling options you'll find in PC games, and for one simple reason: They work with any of the best graphics cards. Choosing between them isn't simple, however. There are some big differences in image quality and performance, even with the same graphics card and the same game.

We've been testing AMD FSR and Intel XeSS for months across various games, but it's time to compare them point for point. If you're looking for a simple answer on which is best, you w0n't find it here. However, we'll still dig into the nuances between FSR and XeSS and what you need to know about the two upscaling features.
AMD FSR vs. Intel XeSS: how they work

Read more
The only Intel CPU you should buy is over a year old
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

While it's true that Intel has no shortage of top-notch CPUs, there's only one you should really be buying in 2024 for gaming purposes, and it's well over a year old. It's not that the other CPUs are bad -- it's that this processor is quite unmatched in terms of performance per dollar, and it's more than good enough for most uses.

The CPU in question is the Intel Core i5-13600K. You might be tempted to buy something pricier, perhaps even something as over the top as the Core i9-14900KS. But I'm here to tell you that you really don't need to. And if you'd rather spend even less, I'll show you my favorite alternatives.
A value pick
Intel's Core i5 series is typically the one to target in terms of value, but there's usually a gap between the midrange i5 and the enthusiast i7. While that gap is still present in this generation, it's nowhere near big enough for you to have to worry about it if all you're looking for is gaming.

Read more
Nice try, Intel, but AMD 3D V-Cache chips still win
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor.

Intel's freshly released Core i9-14900KS processor is advertised as the fastest CPU in the world, but does that mean AMD can never hope to compete, even with its flagship Ryzen 9 7950X3D? Not at all. Each CPU has its merits, and both are insanely powerful in their own right. At this price point and at this performance level, making the right choice is tricky.

Let's zoom in and find out how the Core i9-14900KS and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D stack up against each other, what they excel at, and which one is the better option to buy.
Pricing and availability

Read more